, Volume 140, Issue 2–3, pp 141–150 | Cite as

Ultrastructure of the cytoskeleton in freeze-substituted pollen tubes ofNicotiana alata

  • S. A. Lancelle
  • M. Cresti
  • P. K. Hepler


The ultrastructure of the cytoskeleton inNicotiana alata pollen tubes grownin vitro has been examined after rapid freeze fixation and freeze substitution (RF-FS). Whereas cytoplasmic microtubules (MTs) and especially microfilaments (MFs) are infrequently observed after conventional chemical fixation, they occur in all samples prepared by RF-FS. Cortical MTs are oriented parallel to the long axis of the pollen tube and usually appear evenly spaced around the circumference of the cell. They are always observed with other components in a structural complex that includes the following: 1. a system of MFs, in which individual elements are aligned along the sides of the MTs and crossbridged to them; 2. a system of cooriented tubular endoplasmic reticulum (ER) lying beneath the MTs, and 3. the plasma membrane (PM) to which the MTs appear to be extensively linked. The cortical cytoskeleton is thus structurally complex, and contains elements such as MFs and ER that must be considered together with the MTs in any attempt to elucidate cytoskeletal function. MTs are also observed within the vegetative cytoplasm either singly or in small groups. Observations reveal that some of these may be closely associated with the envelope of the vegetative nucleus. MTs of the generative cell, in contrast to those of the vegetative cytoplasm, occur tightly clustered in bundles and show extensive cross-bridging. These bundles, especially in the distal tail of the generative cell, are markedly undulated. MFs are observed commonly in the cytoplasm of the vegetative cell. They occur in bundles oriented predominantly parallel to the pollen tube axis. Although proof is not provided, we suggest that they are composed of actin and are responsible for generating the vigorous cytoplasmic streaming characteristic of living pollen tubes.


Cytoskeleton Freeze substitution Nicotiana Pollen tubes Rapid freeze fixation 



ethylene glycol bis-(β-aminoethyl ether), N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid


endoplasmic reticulum






polyethylene glycol


plasma membrane


rapid freeze fixation-freeze substitution


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Condeelis JS (1974) The identification of F-actin in the pollen tube and protoplast ofAmaryllis belladonna. Exp Cell Res 88: 435–439PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cresti M, Ciampolini F, Kapil RN (1984) Generative cells of some angiosperms with particular emphasis on their microtubules. J Submicrosc Cytol 16: 317–326Google Scholar
  3. — —,Mulcahy DLM, Mulcahy G (1985) Ultrastructure ofNicotiana alata pollen, its germination and early tube formation. Am J Bot 72: 719–727Google Scholar
  4. —,Hepler PK, Tiezzi A, Ciampolini F (1986) Fibrillar structures inNicotiana pollen: changes in ultrastructure during pollen activation and tube emission. In:Mulcahy DL, Mulcahy G, Ottaviano E (eds) Biotechnology and ecology of pollen. Springer, New York, pp 283–288Google Scholar
  5. Derksen J, Pierson ES, Traas JA (1985) Microtubules in vegetative and generative cells of pollen tubes. Eur J Cell Biol 38: 142–148Google Scholar
  6. Franke WW, Herth W, Woude WJ Van Der, Morre DJ (1972) Tubular and filamentous structures in pollen tubes: possible involvement as guide elements in protoplasmic streaming and vectorial migration of secretory vesicles. Planta 105: 317–341Google Scholar
  7. Hardham AR, Green PB, Lang JM (1980) Reorganization of cortical microtubules and cellulose deposition during leaf formation inGraptopetalum paraguayense. Planta 149: 181–195Google Scholar
  8. Heath IB, Seagull RW (1982) Oriented cellulose fibrils and the cytoskeleton: a critical comparison of models. In:Lloyd CW (ed) The cytoskeleton in plant growth and development. Academic Press, London, pp 163–182Google Scholar
  9. Hepler PK, Palevitz BA (1974) Microtubules and microfilaments. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 25: 309–362Google Scholar
  10. Herth W (1978) Ionophore A23187 stops tip growth, but not cytoplasmic streaming, in pollen tubes ofLilium longiflorum. Protoplasma 96: 275–282Google Scholar
  11. —,Franke WW, Woude WJ Van Der (1972) Cytochalasin stops tip growth in plants. Naturwissenschaften 59: 38–39Google Scholar
  12. Hoefert LL (1969) Fine structure of sperm cells in pollen grains ofBeta. Protoplasma 68: 237–240Google Scholar
  13. Lancelle SA, Callaham DA, Hepler PK (1986) A method for rapid freeze fixation of plant cells. Protoplasma 131: 153–165Google Scholar
  14. Mascarenhas JP, Lafountain J (1972) Protoplasmic streaming, cytochalasin B, and growth of the pollen tube. Tiss Cell 4: 11–14Google Scholar
  15. Miki-Hirosige H, Nakamura S (1982) Process of metabolism during pollen tube wall formation. J Electron Microsc 31: 51–62Google Scholar
  16. Perdue TD, Parthasarathy MV (1985)In situ localization of F-actin in pollen tubes. Eur J Cell Biol 39: 13–20Google Scholar
  17. Picton JM, Steer MW (1981) Determination of secretory vesicle production rates by dictyosomes in pollen tubes ofTradescantia using cytochalasin D. J Cell Sci 49: 261–272PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. — — (1983) Evidence for the role of Ca2+ ions in tip extension in pollen tubes. Protoplasma 115: 11–17Google Scholar
  19. — — (1985) The effects of ruthenium red, lanthanum, fluorescein isothiocyanate and trifluoperazine on vesicle transport, vesicle fusion, and tip extension in pollen tubes. Planta 163: 20–26Google Scholar
  20. Pierson ES, Derksen J, Traas JA (1986) Organization of microfilaments and microtubules in pollen tubes grownin vitro orin vivo in various angiosperms. Eur J Cell Biol 41: 14–18Google Scholar
  21. Reiss H-D, Herth W (1979) Calcium ionophore A23187 affects localized wall secretion in the tip region of pollen tubes ofLilium longiflorum. Planta 145: 225–232Google Scholar
  22. — — (1982) Disoriented growth of pollen tubes ofLilium longiflorum Thunb induced by prolonged treatment with the calciumchelating antibiotic, chlortetracycline. Planta 156: 218–225Google Scholar
  23. — — (1985) Nifedipine-sensitive calcium channels are involved in polar growth of lily pollen tubes. J Cell Sci 76: 247–254PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Seagull RW, Heath IB (1979) The effects of tannic acid on thein vivo preservation of microfilaments. Eur J Cell Biol 20: 184–188PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Tiezzi A, Cresti M, Ciampolini F (1986) Microtubules inNicotiana pollen tubes: ultrastructural, immunofluorescence, and biochemical data. In:Cresti M, Dallai R (eds) Biology of reproduction and cell motility in plants and animals. University of Siena, Siena, pp 87–94Google Scholar
  26. Tiwari SC, Wick SM, Williamson RE, Gunning BES (1984) Cytoskeleton and integration of cellular function in cells of higher plants. J Cell Biol 99: 63 s-69 sGoogle Scholar
  27. Traas J (1986) Microtubules in pollen tubes ofNicotiana tabacum grownin vitro. In: The cytoskeleton in plant cell growth, differentiation and cell wall synthesis. PhD Thesis, University of Nijmegen, pp 129–143Google Scholar
  28. —,Braat P, Emons AMC, Meekes H, Derksen J (1985) Microtubules in root hairs. J Cell Sci 76: 303–320PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang H-Q, Croes AF (1982) A new medium for pollen germinationin vitro. Acta Bot Neerl 31: 113–119Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. A. Lancelle
    • 2
  • M. Cresti
    • 1
  • P. K. Hepler
    • 2
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Biologia AmbientaleUniversita di SienaItaly
  2. 2.Botany DepartmentUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations