Co-metabolism of citrate and maltose byLactobacillus brevis subsp.lindneri CB1 citrate-negative strain: effect on growth, end-products and sourdough fermentation

  • Marco Gobbetti
  • Aldo Corsetti
Original Paper

Abstract

Growth, substrates and end-product formation of the maltose and citrate co-metabolization byLactobacillus brevis subsp.lindneri CB1 citrate-negative strain were initially studied in synthetic medium. Compared to maltose (19 g/l) fermentation, the co-metabolization of maltose (10 g/l) plus citrate (9 g/l) caused faster cell growth, increased the concentrations of lactic acid and especially of acetic acid (from 0.7 g/l to 2.9 g/l), produced succinic acid (0.5 g/l) and reduced ethanol synthesis. Highest activities of acetate kinase, the same of lactate dehydrogenase and a reduced alcohol dehydrogenase activity were detected in cytoplasmic extracts of cells growing on maltose plus citrate. The breakdown of citrate depended upon the continuous presence of maltose in the growth medium. Upon depletion of citrate, the cells continued through the normal maltose fermentation, having a diauxic metabolic curve as shown by impedance measurements. Concentrations of citrate from 3 g/l to 15 g/l led to increases of acetic acid from 1.25 g/l to 5.55 g/l. Since maltose was naturally present during sourdough fermentation, the addition of 9 g citrate per kg wheat dough enabled the co-metabolization of maltose and citrate byL. brevis subsp.lindneri CB1. Compared with traditional sourdough fermentation, faster cell growth, a higher acetic acid concentration and a reduced quotient of fermentation were obtained by co-metabolism.

Key words

Lactobacillus brevis subsp lindneri CB1 Co-metabolism Citrate Maltose Fermentation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kennes C, Veiga MC, Dubourguier HC, Touzel JP, Albagnac G, Naveau H, Nyns EJ (1981) Appl Environ Microbiol 57: 1046–1051Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Axelsson LT (1993) In: Salminen S, von Wright A (eds) Lactic acid bacteria. Dekker, New York, pp 1–63Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    da Cunha MV, Foster MA (1992) J Bacteriol 174: 1013–1019PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cogan TM (1987) J Appl Bacteriol 63: 551–558Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schmitt P, Diviès C, Merlot C (1990) Biotechnol Lett 12: 127–130Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schmitt P, Bernet N, Zarzell Y, Diviès C (1994) Milchwissenschaft 49: 183–185Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Talarico TL, Axelsson LT, Novotny J, Fiuzat M, Dobrogosz WJ (1990) Appl Environ Microbiol 56: 943–948Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gobbetti M, Corsetti A, Rossi J (1995) Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 42: 939–944Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lütgens M, Gottschalk G (1980) J Gen Microbiol 119: 63–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gobbetti M, Corsetti A, Rossi J (1994) Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 41: 456–460Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gobbetti M, Corsetti A, Rossi J (1994) World J Microbiol Biotechnol 10: 275–279Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gobbetti M, Simonetti MS, Rossi J, Cossignani L, Corsetti A, Damiani P (1994) J Food Sci 59: 881–884Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gobbetti M, Corsetti A, Rossi J (1994) Microbiol Alim Nutr 12: 9–15Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gobbetti M, Corsetti A, Rossi J, La Rosa F, De Vincenzi S (1994) Ital J Food Sci 1: 85–94Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kline L, Sugihara TF (1971) Appl Microbiol 21: 459–465PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bergmeyer HU, Graßl M, Walter HS (1983) In: Bergemeyer HU (ed) Methods of enzymatic analysis, vol. 2. Weinheim, Deerfield Beach, Fla., pp 126–326Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smith AF (1983) In: Bergemeyer HU (ed) Methods of enzymatic analysis, vol. 3. Weinheim, Deerfield Beach, Fla., pp 166–171Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wahlefeld AW (1983) In: Bergemeyer HU (ed) Methods of enzymatic analysis, vol. 3. Weinheim, Deerfield Beach, Fla., pp 126–133Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Walsh B, Cogan TM (1974) J Dairy Res 41: 25–30Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Quaglia G (1984) In: Quaglia G (ed) Scienza e tecnologia della panificazione. Chiriotti, Pinerolo, Italy, pp 295–323Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Okigbo LM, Oberg CJ, Richardson GH (1985) J Dairy Sci 68: 2521–2527Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Drinan DF, Tobin S, Cogan TM (1976) Appl Environ Microbiol 31: 481–486PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Radier F (1973) In: Carr JG, Cutting CV, Whiting GC (eds) Lactic acid bacteria in beverages and food. Academic Press, London, pp 17–35Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Axelsson LT, Lindgren S (1987) J Appl Bacteriol 62: 433–438PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Spicher G (1983) In: Rehm HJ, Reed G (eds) Biotechnology, vol. 5. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, Fla., pp 1–80Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Correra C (1994) Il Latte 9: 866–869Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Gobbetti
    • 1
  • Aldo Corsetti
    • 1
  1. 1.Agricultural FacultyInstitute of Dairy MicrobiologyPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations