, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 33–38 | Cite as

The impact of some specific air pollutants on agricultural productivity

  • E. M. Shaibu-Imodagbe


Unplanned discharges of atmospheric pollutants influenced by intense industrialisation, the population explosion and urbanisation result in injury and damage. The intensity and nature of the damage is a function of the concentration of the pollutant and the duration of exposure (dose). This has immediate (acute) and long (chronic) effects on the quantity and quality of agricultural products.

Based on the properties of these pollutants, the resulting effects on the receptor may cause biochemical and physiological modifications at the cellular level as well as whole plant, animal and ecosystem alterations. These may cause significant changes in agricultural output.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bellinger, E.G. 1984–85. Internal working papers. Pollution Research Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
  2. Biggs, A.R. and Davies, D.D. 1980. Stomatal response of three birch species exposed to varying acute doses of SO2.J. American Soc. Hort. Science,105, 514–516.Google Scholar
  3. Heath, R.L. 1975. Initial events in injury to plant by air pollutants.Analytical Review Plant Physiology,31, 395–431.Google Scholar
  4. Holdgate, M.W. 1979. A Perspective of environmental pollution. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Mansfield, T.A. (ed.), 1976. Effects of air pollutants on plants, pp.209. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. McCune, D.C. and Weinstein, L.H. 1971. Metabolic effects of atmospheric fluorides on plants.Environ. Pollut.,1, 169–174.Google Scholar
  7. Overrein, L. 1980. Results of the Norwegian study of the effects of acidic precipitation on forest and fish resources. Effects of air pollutants on Mediterranean and Temperate forest ecosystems. An International Symposium, Riverside, California, June 22–27.Google Scholar
  8. Reinert, R.A., Heagle, A.S. and Heck, W.W. 1975. Plant responses to pollutant combinations. In: Mudd, J.B. and Kozlowski, T.T. (eds),Responses of Plants to Air Pollutants, pp.159–178. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Silvius, J.E. Ingle, M. and Baer, C.H. 1975. Sulphur dioxide inhibition of photosynthesis in isolated spinach chloroplasts.Plant Physiology,56, 434–437.Google Scholar
  10. Stewart, D., Treshow, M. and Harner, F.M. 1973. Pathological anatomy of conifer needle necrosis,Canadian J. Botany,51, 983–988.Google Scholar
  11. Thomas, M.D. 1958. Air pollution with relation to agronomic crops. I: General status of research on the effects of air pollution on plants.Agron. J.,50, 545–540.Google Scholar
  12. Tisdale, S.L. and Nelson, W.L. 1975.Soil Fertility and Fertilisers 3rd ed., pp.494. Macmillan Publishing Co Inc, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Treshow, M. 1984. Effects of air pollutants on plants. In: Englund, S. and Calvert, S. (eds),Hand-Book on Air Pollution Control Technology, pp.7–24. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester and New York.Google Scholar
  14. Waldron, H.A. 1980. Effects of inhaled materials. In: Waldron, H.A. and Harrington, J.M. (eds),Occupational Hygiene — An Introduction, pp.96–111. Blackwell Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. White, K.N. 1984–85. Internal working papers. Pollution Research Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science and Technology Letters 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. M. Shaibu-Imodagbe
    • 1
  1. 1.Ahmadu Bello UniversityZariaNigeria

Personalised recommendations