Advertisement

Population and Environment

, Volume 8, Issue 3–4, pp 223–239 | Cite as

A model of the determinants in married women of sterilization method choice

  • Warren B. Miller
  • Rochelle N. Shain
  • David J. Pasta
Article

Abstract

A model for predicting sterilization method selection is constructed on the basis of hypotheses about 1. the relationship between the fertility termination, sterilization, and method selection decisions and 2. the influence of substantive, processual, and contextual factors in those decisions. The model is found to have an acceptably good fit to data from almost five hundred women in married couples selecting either tubal ligation or vasectomy. A number of interesting dynamic pathways leading to method selection are observed. Some weaknesses in the model are discussed. It is desirable that further confirmation and elaboration of the model using longitudinal and husband-wife data be undertaken.

Keywords

Method Selection Contextual Factor Married Woman Married Couple Fertility Termination 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bean, F. D., Clark, M. P., Swicegood, G. and Williams, D. Husband-wife communication, wife's employment and the decision for male or female sterilization.Journal of Marriage and the Family 1983,45 395–403.Google Scholar
  2. Clark, M. P., Bean, F. D., Swicegood, G. and Ansbacher, R. The decision for male versus female sterilization.The Family Coordinator 1979,28 250–254.Google Scholar
  3. Clark, M. P. and Swicegood, G. Husband or wife? A multivariate analysis of decision-making for voluntary sterilization.Journal of Family Issues 1982,3 341–360.Google Scholar
  4. Joreskog, K. G. and Sorbom, D.LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software, Inc., 1984.Google Scholar
  5. Markman, L. M. and Frankel, H. A. The choice of sterilization procedure among married couples.The Journal of Family Practice 1982,14 27–30.Google Scholar
  6. Miller, W. B. Psychosocial aspects of contraceptive sterilization in women. In S. H. Newman and Z. E. Klein (Eds.),Behavioral-social aspects of contraceptive sterilization. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1978.Google Scholar
  7. Miller, W. B. and Shain, R. N. Married women and contraceptive sterilization: Factors that contribute to pre-surgical ambivalence.Journal of Biosocial Science 1985,17 471–479.Google Scholar
  8. Mumford, S. D. The vasectomy decision-making process.Studies in Family Planning 1983,14 83–88.Google Scholar
  9. Nolan, T. F., Ory, H. W., Layde, P. M., Maze, J. and Greenspan, J. R. Cumulative prevalence rates and corrected incidence rates of surgical sterilization among American women, 1971–1978.American Journal of Epidemiology 1982,116 776–781.Google Scholar
  10. SAS Institute, Inc.SAS user's guide: Statistics. Cary, N.C., 1982.Google Scholar
  11. Shain, R. N., Miller, W. B. and Holden, A. E. C. The decision to terminate childbearing: Differences in preoperative ambivalence between tubal ligation women and vasectomy wives.Social Biology 1984,31 40–58.Google Scholar
  12. Shain, R. N., Miller, W. B. and Holden, A. E. C. Factors associated with married women's selection of tubal sterilization and vasectomy.Fertility and Sterility 1985,43 234–244.Google Scholar
  13. Westoff, C. F. and Jones, E. F. Contraception and sterilization in the United States, 1965–1975.Family Planning Perspectives 1977,9 153–157.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Warren B. Miller
    • 1
  • Rochelle N. Shain
    • 2
  • David J. Pasta
    • 3
  1. 1.Transnational Family Research InstitutePalo AltoUSA
  2. 2.University of Texas Health Science CenterUSA
  3. 3.DMA CorporationUSA

Personalised recommendations