Journal of Neural Transmission

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 113–154 | Cite as

Vago-sympathetic modulation of gastric mechanoreceptors: Effect of distention and nutritional state

  • K. N. Sharma
  • H. L. Jacobs
  • V. Gopal
  • S. Dua-Sharma
Article

Summary

Unit discharge evoked in gastric afferents by tactile stimulation of the frog's stomach was inhibited by electrical stimulation of gastric vagi and facilitated by cervical sympathetic stimulation. The inhibition or the facilitation of the evoked response depended on the mode and parameters of stimulation used. The tactually-evoked activity was also inhibited by gastric distention in well-fed animals (Type-I). This inhibition was released by gastric vagotomy, while cervical sympathectomy had no appreciable effect on the evoked inhibitory response.

In Type-II animals (animals kept on chronic food deprivation) the tactually-evoked activity was facilitated, rather than inhibited, by coupling tactile stimulation with gastric distention. This facilitation was abolished by cervical sympathectomy, but was not significantly affected by gastric vagotomy. It appears that the differential modulating control of gastric mechanoreceptor activity is biased by the state of energy balance and is brought about by a dual efferent control system mediated through autonomic nerves, gastric vagal fibers being inhibitory, and cervical sympathetic nerves being facilitatory to the tactile response.

Keywords

Sympathetic Nerve Food Deprivation Autonomic Nerve Tactile Stimulation Differential Modulate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ash, R. W.: Stimuli in influencing the secretion of acid by the abomasum of sheep. J. Physiol. (Lond.)157, 185–207 (1961).Google Scholar
  2. Chernetski, K. E.: Cephalic sympathetic fibers in the frog. J. Comp. Neurol.122, 173–179 (1964 a).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chernetski, K. E.: Sympathetic enhancement of peripheral sensory input in the frog. J. Neurophysiol.27, 493–515 (1964 b).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chernigovsky, V. N.: The significance of interoceptive signals in the food behavior of animals. In: Brain and Behavior (Proc. of the Second Conference on Brain and Behavior, Los Angeles 1962), pp. 319–348. Washington: Am. Inst. Biol. Sc. 1963.Google Scholar
  5. Del Castillo, J., andB. Katz: Production of membrane potential changes in the frog's heart by inhibitory nerve impulses. Nature (Lond.)175, 1035 (1955).Google Scholar
  6. Desmedt, J. E., andP. Monoco: Mode of action of the efferent olivocochlear bundle on the inner ear. Nature (Lond.)192, 1263–1265 (1961).Google Scholar
  7. Eldred, E., H. N. Schmitzlein, andJ. Buchwald: Response of muscle spindles to stimulation of the sympathetic trunk. Exp. Neurol.2, 187–195 (1960).Google Scholar
  8. Granit, R.: Centrifugal and antidromic effects on ganglion cells of retina. J. Neurophysiol.18, 388–411 (1955).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Granit, R.: Muscular afferents and motor control (Proc. of the First Nobel Symposium, Sodergarn 1965), pp. 1–466. New York: J. Wiley. 1966.Google Scholar
  10. Grossman, M. I.: Integration of current views on regulation of hunger and appetite. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.63, 76–91 (1955).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hill, K. J.; Continuous gastric secretion in the ruminant. Quart. J. Exptl. Physiol.40, 32–39 (1955).Google Scholar
  12. Hsu, F. Y., andW. Yang: The actions of some autonomic drugs on the dog's small intestine. Proc. Chinese Physiol. Soc., Chengtu Branch.2, 107–112 (1945).Google Scholar
  13. Hukuhara, T., S. Nakayama, andR. Namba: Locality of receptors concerned with intestino-intestinal extrinsic and intestinal muscular intrinsic reflexes. Japan J. Physiol.10, 414–419 (1959).Google Scholar
  14. Hunt, C. C.: The effect of sympathetic stimulation on mammalian muscle spindles. J. Physiol. (Lond.)151, 332–341 (1960).Google Scholar
  15. Hunt, J. N.: Some properties of an alimentary osmoreceptor mechanism. J. Physiol. (Lond.)132, 267–288 (1956).Google Scholar
  16. Hunt, J. N., andI. MacDonald: The influence of volume on gastric emptying. J. Physiol. (Lond.)126, 459–474 (1954).Google Scholar
  17. Hutter, O. F., andW. R. Loewenstein: Nature of neuromuscular facilitation by sympathetic stimulation in the frog. J. Physiol. (Lond.)130, 559–571 (1955).Google Scholar
  18. Hutter, O. F., andW. Trautwein: Effect of vagal stimulation on the sinus venosus of the frog's heart. Nature (Lond.)176, 512–513 (1955).Google Scholar
  19. Iggo, A.,: Gastro-intestinal tension receptors with unmyelinated afferent fibers in the vagus of the cat. Quart. J. Exptl. Physiol.42, 130–143 (1957 a).Google Scholar
  20. Iggo, A.: Gastric mucosal chemoreceptors with vagal afferent fibers in the cat. Quart. J. Exptl. Physiol.42, 398–409 (1957 b).Google Scholar
  21. Jacobs, H. L.: Some physical, metabolic, and sensory components in the appetite for glucose. Am. J. Physiol.203, 1043–1954 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jacobs, H. L., andK. N. Sharma: Energy balance and palatability: the effect of food deprivation on the intake of positively and negatively flavored solutions. The Physiol.7, 166 (1964).Google Scholar
  23. Jacobs, H. L., andK. N. Sharma: Taste versus calories: Sensory and metabolic signals in the control of food intake. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.157, 1084–1125 (1969).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacobs, H. L., K. N. Sharma, andS. Dua-Sharma: Energy balance and feeding behavior: The effect of food deprivation on the intake of high salt diets. Proc. XXIII Int. Cong. Physiol. Sc. Tokyo, 1965, p. 226.Google Scholar
  25. Janowitz, H. D.: Hunger and appetite. Am. J. Med.25, 327–332 (1958).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kewenter, J.: The vagal control of the jejunal and ileal motility and blood flow. Acta. Physiol. Scand.65, Suppl. 251, 1–68 (1965).Google Scholar
  27. Kuffler, S. W., C. C. Hunt, andJ. P. Quilliam: Functions of meduilated small-nerve fibers in mammalian ventral roots: efferent muscle spindle innervation. J. Neurophysiol.14, 29–54 (1951).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lemagnen, J.: Le control sensoriel dans la régulation de l'apport alimentaire. Extrait De “L'Obésite”. Expansion Scientifique, pp. 147–171, Paris 1963.Google Scholar
  29. Loewenstein, W. R.: Modulation of cutaneous mechanoreceptors by sympathetic stimulation. J. Physiol. (Lond.)132, 40–60 (1956).Google Scholar
  30. Loewenstein, W. R. andR. Altamirano-Orrego: Enhancement of activity in a pacinian corpuscle by sympathomimetic agents. Nature (Lond.)178, 1292–1293 (1956).Google Scholar
  31. Martinson, J.: Studies on the efferent vagal control of the stomach. Acta. Physiol. Scand.65, Suppl. 255, 1–24 (1965).Google Scholar
  32. Martinson, J., andA. Muren: Excitatory and inhibitory effects of vagus stimulation on gastric motility in the cat. Acta. Physiol. Scand.57, 309–316 (1963).Google Scholar
  33. Matthews, P. B. C.: Muscle spindles and their motor control. Physiol. Rev.44, 219–288 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Morgane, P. J., andH. L. Jacobs: Hunger and satiety. In: World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics. (Bourne, G. H., ed.). Basel: Karger.10, 100–213 (1969).Google Scholar
  35. Niijima, A.: Afferent impulses in the gastric and oesophageal branch of the vagal nerve of toad. Physiol. Behav.2, 1–4 (1967).Google Scholar
  36. Paintal, A. S.: A study of gastric stretch receptors: their role in the peripheral mechanism of satiation of hunger and thirst. J. Physiol. (Lond.)126, 255–270 (1954).Google Scholar
  37. Sharma, K. N.: Receptor mechanisms in the alimentary tract: their excitation and functions. In: Handbook of Physiology. Alimentary Canal, Section 6, Vol. I, pp. 225–237 (Code, C. F., ed.). Washington: Am. Physiol. Soc. 1967 (a).Google Scholar
  38. Sharma, K. N.: Alimentary receptors and food intake regulation. In: Chemical Senses and Nutrition, pp. 281–291 (Kare, M., andO. Maller, eds.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press. 1967 (b).Google Scholar
  39. Sharma, K. N., B. K. Anand, S. Dua, andB. Singh: Role of stomach in the regulation of activities of hypothalamic feeding centers. Am. J. Physiol.201, 593–598 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Sudakov, K. Y., andS. K. Rogacheva: The afferent and efferent activity of the fiber of the vagus nerve during fasting and after taking food. Fed. Proc. Trans. Suppl.22, 306–310 (1963).Google Scholar
  41. Thomas, J. E., andM. Y. Baldwin: Pathways and mechanisms of regulation of gastric motility. In: Handbook of Physiology. Alimentary Canal, Section 6, Vol. IV, pp. 1937–1968 (Code, C. F., ed.). Washington; Am. Physiol. Soc. 1968.Google Scholar
  42. Wayner, M. J.: Motor control functions of the lateral hypothalamus and adjunctive behavior. Physiol. Behav.5, 1319–1325 (1970). Author's address:Dr. K. N. Sharma, Chairman and Professor of Physiology, St. John's Medical College, Bangalore-34, India.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. N. Sharma
    • 1
    • 2
  • H. L. Jacobs
    • 1
    • 2
  • V. Gopal
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Dua-Sharma
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhysiologySt. John's Medical CollegeBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Pioneering Res. LabU.S. Army Natick LabsNatickUSA

Personalised recommendations