Population and Environment

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 32–56 | Cite as

How urbanites define their neighborhoods

  • Avery M. Guest
  • Barrett A. Lee


This paper explores the ways that residents of the Seattle metropolitan region define "neighborhood" in the abstract and their own neighborhoods in particular. On the whole, the neighborhood is regarded as a relatively limited unit, both in terms of areal size and functional relevance. Two major dimensions of neighborhood definition are evident. Individuals tend to define neighborhood primarily in terms of either human interaction or pure space, and they also differ in their views on its geographic size and institutional development. The two dimensions of definition are shown to vary with patterns of local activity, social-demographic characteristics, and the physical environment. While only a small proportion of the variation in responses is explained, the results suggest that neighborhood definitions are rational responses to the social and physical position of the respondent within urban society.


Small Proportion Physical Environment Local Activity Human Interaction Institutional Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andrews, F. M., Morgan, J. N., Sonquist, J. A., Klem, L. (1973).Multiple classification analysis (2nd ed). Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  2. Appleyard, D. (1970). Why buildings are known: A predictive tool for architects and planners.Environment and Behavior, 1 131–156.Google Scholar
  3. Birch, B. L., Braun, E. S., Colman, R. P., Da Lomba, D. W., Parsons, W. L., Sharpe, L. C., Weber, S. A. (1979).The behavioral foundations of neighborhood change. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  4. Dewey, R. (1905). The neighborhood, urban ecology and city planners.American Sociological Review, 15 502–507.Google Scholar
  5. Everitt, J., & Cadwallader, M. (1972). The home area concept in urban analysis: The use of cognitive mapping and computer procedures as methodological tools. In W. J. Mitchell (Ed.),Environmental design: Research and practice (pp. 1.2.1–1.2.10). Los Angeles: University of California/EDRA 3.Google Scholar
  6. Fried, M. (1973).The world of the urban working class. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gans, H. J. (1962).The urban villagers. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gerson, K. C., Stueve, A., & Fischer, C. S. (1977).Attachment to place. In C. S. Fischer, R. M. Jackson, C. A. Stueve, K. Gerson, L. M. Jones, & M. Baldassare (Eds.),Networks and places: Social relations in the urban setting (pp. 139–161). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. Greer, S. (1962).The emerging city: Myth and reality. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Guest, A. M., & Weed, J. A. (1976). Ethnic residential segregation: Patterns of change.American Journal of Sociology, 81 1088–1111.Google Scholar
  11. Guest, A. M., Lee, B. A., & Staeheli, L. (1982). Changing locality identification in the metropolis, Seattle: 1920–1978.American Sociological Review, 47 543–549.Google Scholar
  12. Guest, A. M., Staeheli, L., & Lee, B. A. (1983). Consensus on locality names in the metropolis.Sociology and Social Research, 67 374–391.Google Scholar
  13. Haney, W. G., & Knowles, E. S. (1978). Perception of neighborhoods by city and suburban residents.Human Ecology, 6 201–214.Google Scholar
  14. Hawley, A. (1971).Urban society: An ecological approach. New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
  15. House, J., & Wolf, S. (1978). Effects of urban residence on interpersonal trust and helping behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36 1029–1043.Google Scholar
  16. Hunter, A. (1974).Symbolic communities. The persistence and change of Chicago local communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hunter, A. (1978). Persistence of local sentiments in mass society. In D. Street (Ed.),Handbook of contemporary urban life (pp. 133–162). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  18. Kasarda, J. D., & Janowitz, M. (1974). Community attachment in mass society.American Sociological Review, 39 328–339.Google Scholar
  19. Keller, S. (1968).The urban neighborhood. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lee, T. R. (1973). Psychology and living space. In R. M. Downs & D. Stea (Eds.),Image and environment: Cognitive mapping and spatial behavior (pp. 87–108). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  21. Lynch, K. (1960).The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  22. McClenahan, B. A. (1929).The changing urban neighborhood: A sociological study. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.Google Scholar
  23. McKenzie, R. D. (1923).The neighborhood: A study of local life in the city of Columbus, Ohio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Orleans, P. (1973). Differential cognition of urban residents: Effects of social scale on mapping. In R. M. Downs & D. Stea (Eds.),Image and environment: Cognitive mapping and spatial behavior (pp. 115–130). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  25. Orleans, P., & Schmidt, S. (1972). Mapping the city: Environmental cognition of urban residents. In W. J. Mitchell (Ed.),Environmental design: Research and practice (pp. 1.4.1–1.4.9). Los Angeles: University of California/EDRA 3.Google Scholar
  26. Riemer, S. (1951). Villagers in metropolis. British Journal of Sociology, 2, 31–43.Google Scholar
  27. Suttles, G. (1972).The social construction of communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Sweetser, F. L., Jr. Neighborhood acquaintance and association: A study of personal neighborhoods (Doctoral Dissertation, Columbia University, 1941).Google Scholar
  29. Taylor, R. B. (1982). Neighborhood physical environment and stress. In G. W. Evans (Ed.),Environmental stress (pp. 286–324). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Warren, D. I. (1975).Black neighborhoods: An assessment of community power. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  31. Warren, R. L. (1965).Studying your community. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  32. Webber, M. M. (1963). Order in diversity: Community without propinquity. In L. Wingo (Ed.),Cities and space: The future use of urban land (pp. 23–54). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Wellman, B., & Leighton, B. (1979). Neighborhoods, networks and communities: Approaches to the community question.Urban Affairs Quarterly, 14 363–390.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Avery M. Guest
    • 1
  • Barrett A. Lee
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of WashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyVanderbilt UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations