Population and Environment

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 203–220 | Cite as

The effects of building size on personal crime and fear of crime

  • Oscar Newman
  • Karen A. Franck
Article

Abstract

The research that formed the basis of Newman's bookDefensible Space demonstrated that building height is one of the leading predictors of robbery rate in low-income public housing projects. Research reported in this article was undertaken to extend the scope and detail of the earlier work and, most importantly, to examine the causal mechanisms underlying the relationship of physical design to crime and fear of crime. The study sites in this new research are moderate-income, federallyassisted housing developments and low-income public housing projects. The major source of data is a household survey of residents. The findings provide important empirical support for the postulates of defensible space theory by showing that building size affects personal crime and fear of crime through residents' control and use of the space outside their apartments. Building size has a large total effect on residents' fear of crime, but despite its important indirect effects on personal crime, the total effect of building size on personal crime is not as strong as expected. Possible reasons for this unexpected finding are used to suggest refinements to defensible space theory.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alwin, D.F., & Hauser, R. The decomposition of effects in path analysis.American Sociological Review 1975,40 37–47.Google Scholar
  2. Cooper, C.Residents' attitude toward the environment at St. Francis Square, San Francisco. Working Paper No. 126. Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, 1970.Google Scholar
  3. Cooper, C., Day, N., & Levine, B.Resident dissatisfaction in multi-family housing. Working Paper No. 160. Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional Planning, 1972.Google Scholar
  4. Gillis, A. R. Household density and human crowding.Journal of Population 1979,2 104–117.Google Scholar
  5. Hanushek, E.A., & Jackson, J.E.Statistical methods for social scientists. New York: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  6. Newman, O.Defensible Space. New York: Macmillan, 1972.Google Scholar
  7. Newman, O.Architectural design for crime prevention. Washington, D.C.: Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, 1973 (a).Google Scholar
  8. Newman, O.Final report: Project for security design in urban residential areas. Washington, D.C.: Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, National Institute of Law Envorcement and Criminal Justice, 1973(b).Google Scholar
  9. Newman, O.Design guidelines for creating defensible space. Washington, D.C.: Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, 1976.Google Scholar
  10. Newman, O., & Franck, K.A.Factors Influencing Crime and Instability in Urban Housing Developments. Washington, D.C.: Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, 1980.Google Scholar
  11. Rainwater, L. Fear and house as haven in the lower class.Journal of American Institute of Planners 1966,32 23–30.Google Scholar
  12. Yancey, W.L. Architecture, interaction, and social control. In J. Helmer and N.A. Eddington (Eds.),Urbanman. New York: The Free Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oscar Newman
    • 1
  • Karen A. Franck
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Community Design AnalysisUSA
  2. 2.New Jersey School of ArchitectureNew Jersey Institute of TechnologyUSA

Personalised recommendations