Natural Language Semantics

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 201–248 | Cite as

Plurals, presuppositions and the sources of distributivity

  • Roger Schwarzschild


This paper begins with a discussion ofcumulativity (e.g., ‘P(a) & P(b) implies P(a+b)’), formalized using a verb phrase operator. Next, the meanings of distributivity markers such aseach and non-distributivity indicators such astogether are considered. An existing analysis ofeach in terms of quantification over parts of a plurality is adopted. However,together is problematic, for it involves a cancellation or negation of the quantification associated witheach. (The four boys together owned exactly three cars could not be true if each of the boys owned three cars, though the same sentence withouttogether could be.) A refinement of this idea of negated quantification over parts is proposed as an analysis for non-distributivity operators. It is then worked out in the system described in Cooper (1983), in which positive and negative extensions are assigned. Presuppositions connected with plural reference are considered at this point as well. Finally, the cumulativity operator is argued to be quantificational and therefore sensitive to contextual domain selection. This context sensitivity is claimed to be the source of distributive readings that appear in the absence of modifiers likeeach and non-distributive or collective readings that arise withouttogether.


Context Sensitivity Distributivity Marker Contextual Domain Distributive Reading Cumulativity Operator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bennett, Michael: 1974,Some Extensions of a Montague Fragment of English, PhD dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  2. Cooper, Robin: 1983,Quantification and Syntactic Theory, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  3. Dougherty, R. C.: 1970, ‘A Grammar of Coordinate Conjoined Structures I’,Language 46(4), 850–898.Google Scholar
  4. Dowty, David and Belinda Brodie: 1984, ‘The Semantics of Floated Quantifiers in a Transformationless Grammar’, in M. Cobler, S. MacKaye and M. T. Wescoat (eds.),Proceedings of WCCFL III, Stanford Linguistics Association, Stanford University, pp. 75–90.Google Scholar
  5. Gillon, Brendan: 1987, ‘The Readings of Plural Noun Phrases in English’,Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 199–219.Google Scholar
  6. Higginbotham, James: 1981, ‘Reciprocal Interpretation’,Journal of Linguistic Research 1(3), 97–117.Google Scholar
  7. Hoeksema, Jack: 1983, ‘Plurality and Conjunction’, in A. ter Meulen (ed.),Studies in Modeltheoretic Semantics (GRASS 1), Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 63–83.Google Scholar
  8. Landman, Fred: 1989, ‘Groups I’,Linguistics and Philosophy 12(5), 559–605.Google Scholar
  9. Lasersohn, Peter: 1988,A Semantics for Groups and Events, PhD dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
  10. Lasersohn, Peter: 1989, ‘On the Readings of Plural Noun Phrases’,Linguistic Inquiry 20(1), 130–134.Google Scholar
  11. Lasersohn, Peter: 1990, ‘Group Action and Spatio-Temporal Proximity’,Linguistics and Philosophy 13(2), 179–206.Google Scholar
  12. Link, Godehard: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice Theoretical Approach’, in R. Bäuerle, Ch. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow (eds.),Meaning, Use, and the Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 302–323.Google Scholar
  13. Link, Godehard: 1987, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Plurals’, in P. Gärdenfors (ed.),Generalized Quantifiers: Linguistic and Logical Approaches (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 31), Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 151–180.Google Scholar
  14. Loebner, Sebastian: 1987, ‘The Conceptual Nature of Natural Language Quantification’, in I. Ruzsa and A. Szabolcsi (eds.),Proceedings of the '87 Debrecen Symposium on Logic and Language, Akademiai Kaido, Budapest.Google Scholar
  15. Moltmann, Friederike: 1990, ‘Semantic Selection and the Determination of Part Structures in the Use of Natural Language’, in M. Stokhof and L. Torenvliet (eds.),Proceedings of the Seventh Amsterdam Colloquium, ITLI, University of Amsterdam, pp. 353–378.Google Scholar
  16. Moltmann, Friederike: 1992, ‘Reciprocals andSame/Different: Towards a Semantic Analysis’,Linguistics and Philosophy 15(4), pp. 411–462.Google Scholar
  17. Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, and J. Svartik: 1985,A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, Longman, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Roberts, Craige: 1987,Modal Subordination, Anaphora and Distributivity, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  19. Scha, Remko J. H.: 1984, ‘Distributive, Collective and Cumulative Quantification’, in J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.),Truth, Interpretation, and Information (GRASS 2), Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 131–158.Google Scholar
  20. Schein, Barry: 1986,Event Logic and the Interpretation of Plurals, PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  21. Schwarzschild, Roger: 1991, ‘Together as Non-Distributivity Marker’, in P. Dekker and M. Stokhof (eds.),Proceedings of the Eighth Amsterdam Colloquium, ITLI, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  22. Schwarzschild, Roger: 1992, ‘Types of Plural Individuals’,Linguistics and Philosophy 15(6), 641–675.Google Scholar
  23. van Eijck, Jan: 1983, ‘Discourse Representation Theory and Plurality’, in A. ter Meulen (ed.),Studies in Modeltheoretic Semantics (GRASS 1), Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 85–106.Google Scholar
  24. Verkuyl, Henk and Jaap van der Does: 1991, ‘The Semantics of Plural Noun Phrases’, ITLI Prepublication LP-91-07, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  25. Westerståhl, Dag: 1985, ‘Determiners and Context Sets’, in J. F. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.),Generalized Quantifiers in Natural Language (GRASS 4), Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 45–72.Google Scholar
  26. Wilkinson, Karina: to appear, ‘Towards a Unified Semantics ofEven’, in S. Moore and A. Z. Wyner (eds.),Proceedings of SALT III, Cornell Working Papers, Cornell University, Ithaca.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger Schwarzschild
    • 1
  1. 1.English DepartmentHebrew University of JerusalemMt. Scopus, JerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations