Advertisement

CHEMOECOLOGY

, Volume 4, Issue 3–4, pp 175–177 | Cite as

Green leaf volatiles enhance sex attractant pheromone of the tobacco budworm,Heliothis virescens (Lep.: Noctuidae)

  • Joseph C. Dickens
  • James W. Smith
  • Douglas M. Light
Short communication

Summary

Components of the green leaf volatile complex (Z-3-hexenyl acetate andE-2-hexenyl acetate) were shown to enhance responses of tobacco budworm,Heliothis virescens, males to the sex attractant pheromone of conspecific females in the field. The results are discussed with regard to green leaf volatiles which enhance the attractant pheromone of a cohabiting species, and serve as attractants of a parasitoid of conspecific larvae.

Key words

green leaf volatiles cotton synergist behaviour sex attractant pheromone Lepidoptera Noctuidae Heliothis virescens 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bell WJ, Cardé RT (1984) Chemical Ecology of Insects. London: Chapman and HallGoogle Scholar
  2. Bedard WD, Tilden PE, Wood DL, Silverstein RM, Brownlee RG, Rodin JO (1969) Western pine beetle: field responses to its sex pheromone and a synergistic host terpene myrcene. Science 164:1284–1285Google Scholar
  3. Borden JH (1985) Aggregation pheromones. Pp 257–285in Kerkut GA, Gilbert LI (eds) Comprehensive Insect Physiology Biochemistry and Pharmacology. Vol. 9. Behaviour. Elmsford/NY: Pergamon PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Cantelo WW, Jacobson M (1979) Corn silk volatiles attract many pest species of moths. J Environ Sci Health A14:695–707Google Scholar
  5. Cardé RT, Baker TC (1984) Sexual communication with pheromones. Pp 355–381in Bell WJ, Cardé RT (eds) Chemical Ecology of Insects. London: Chapman & HallGoogle Scholar
  6. Creighton CS, McFadden TL, Cuthbert ER (1973) Supplementary data on phenylacetaldehyde: an attractant for Lepidoptera. J Econ Entomol 66:114–117Google Scholar
  7. Den Otter CJ, Thomas G (1979) Olfactory preference in insects: a synthesis of behaviour and electrophysiology. Pp 171–182in Kroeze JHA (ed.) Preference Behaviors and Chemoreception. London: Information RetrievalGoogle Scholar
  8. Dickens JC (1989) Green leaf volatiles enhance aggregation pheromone of boll weevil,Anthonomus grandis. Entomol exp appl 52:191–203Google Scholar
  9. Dickens JC, Jang EB, Light DM, Alford AR (1990) Enhancement of insect pheromone responses by green leaf volatiles. Naturwissenschaften 77:29–31Google Scholar
  10. Duncan DB (1955) Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11:1–42Google Scholar
  11. Guérin PM, Städler E, Buser HR (1983) Identification of host plant attractants for the carrot fly,Psila rosae. J Chem Ecol 9:843–861Google Scholar
  12. Hansson BS, Van Der Pers JNC, Löfqvist J (1989) Comparison of male and female olfactory cell response to pheromone compounds and plant volatiles in the turnip moth,Agrotis segetum. Physiol Entomol 14:147–155Google Scholar
  13. Hatanaka A, Kajiwara T, Sekiya J (1987) Biosynthetic pathway for C6-aldehydes formation from linolenic acid in green leaves. Chem Phys Lipids 44:341–361Google Scholar
  14. Katsoyannos BI, Guérin PM (1984) Hexanol: a potent attractant for the black fig fly.Silba adipata. Entomol exp appl 35:71–74Google Scholar
  15. Klun JA, Plimmer JR, Bierl-Leonhardt BA, Sparks AN, Primiani M, Chapman OL, Lee GH, Lepone G (1980) Sex pheromone chemistry of female corn earworm moth,Heliothis zea. J Chem Ecol 6:165–175Google Scholar
  16. Light DM, Flath RA, Buttery RG, Zalom FG, Rice RE, Dickens JC, Jang EB (1993) Host plant green leaf volatiles synergize the synthetic sex pheromones of the corn earworm and codling moth (Lepidoptera). Chemoecology 4:145–152Google Scholar
  17. Ostle B (1963) Statistics in Research. Ames/Iowa: The Iowa State Univ PressGoogle Scholar
  18. Rawaswamy SB, Randle SA, Ma WK (1985) Field evaluation of sex pheromone components ofHeliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in cone traps. Environ Entomol 14:293–296Google Scholar
  19. Roelofs WL, Hill AS, Cardé RT, Baker TC (1974) Two sex pheromone components of the tobacco budworm moth,Heliothis virescens. Life Sci 14:1555–15562PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Thompson AC, Baker DN, Gueldner RC, Hedin PA (1971) Identification and quantitative analysis of the volatile substances emitted by maturing cotton in the field. Plant Physiol 48:50–52Google Scholar
  21. Tressl R, Bahri D, Engel K-H (1981) Lipid oxidation in fruits and vegetables. Pp 213–232in Teranishi R, Barrera-Benites H (eds) Quality of Selected Fruits of North America. ACS Symp Ser 170. Washington DC: Amer Chem SocGoogle Scholar
  22. Turlings TCJ, Tumlinson JH, Lewis WJ (1990) Exploitation of herbivore-induced plant odors by host-seeking parasitic wasps. Science 250:1251–1253Google Scholar
  23. Van Der Pers JNC (1981) Comparison of electroantennogram response spectra to plant volatiles in seven species ofYponomeuta and in the tortricidAdoxophyes orana. Entomol exp appl 30:181–192Google Scholar
  24. Visser JH, Ave DA (1978) General green leaf volatiles in the olfactory orientation of the Colorado beetle,Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Entomol exp appl 24:538–549Google Scholar
  25. Visser JH, Van Straten S, Maarse H (1979) Isolation and identification of volatiles in the foliage of potato,Solanum tuberosum, a host plant of the Colorado beetle,Leptinotarsa decemlineata. J Chem Ecol 5:13–25Google Scholar
  26. Whitman DW (1988) Plant natural products as parasitoid cuing agents. Pp 386–396in Cutler HD (ed.) Biologically Active Natural Products Potential Use in Agriculture. ACS Symp Ser 380. Washington DC: Amer Chem SocGoogle Scholar
  27. Whitman DW, Eller FJ (1990) Parasitic wasps orient to green leaf volatiles. Chemoecology 1:69–75Google Scholar
  28. Youngman RR, Baker TC (1989) Host odor mediated response of female naval orangeworm moths (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) to black and white sticky traps. J Econ Entomol 82:1339–1343Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph C. Dickens
    • 1
  • James W. Smith
    • 1
  • Douglas M. Light
    • 2
  1. 1.Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of AgricultureBoll Weevil Research LaboratoryMississippi StateUSA
  2. 2.Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of AgricultureWestern Regional Research CenterAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations