Population and Environment

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 103–125 | Cite as

Neighborhood naming as an index of attachment to place

  • Ralph B. Taylor
  • Stephen D. Gottfredson
  • Sidney Brower


One aspect of attachment to place may relate to neighborhood naming. That is, recent investigations have found that in many communities large numbers of residents can supply locality labels. The most recent studies, however, have failed to confirm the importance of local social involvement as a predictor of naming. Following the earlier suggestion of Shumaker and Taylor (1983) that attachment dynamics can operate at the group level, we focus on small, local groups by analyzing street blocks. Results support our hypothesis that groups with more shared local ties are more able to supply a neighborhood name. This relationship was also obtained when we examined purely individual-level covariation. Results underscore the multilevel nature of attachment processes and how they are both social and psychological in nature. Links between cognitive and affective components of attachment and practical outcomes such as local problem solving are discussed.


Local Problem Group Level Local Group Practical Outcome Affective Component 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alwin, D. F., & Hauser, R. M. (1975). The decomposition of effects in path analysis.American Sociological Review, 40 37–47.Google Scholar
  2. Appleyard, D. (1981).Livable streets. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Booth, A., & Edwards, J. N. (Eds.) (1973).Social participation in urban society. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Co., Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Brower, S., Dockett, K., & Taylor, R. B. (1983) Residents' perceptions of territorial features and perceived local threat.Environment and Behavior, 15 419–437.Google Scholar
  5. Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950).Social pressures in informal groups. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Gerson, K., Steuve, C., & Fischer, C. (1977). Attachment to place. In C. Fischer et al.,Networks and places. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Guest, A. M., & Lee, B. A. (1983a). Sentiment and evaluation as ecological variables.Sociological Perspectives, 26 159–184.Google Scholar
  8. Guest, A. M., & Lee, B. A. (1983b). Consensus on locality names within the metropolis.Sociology and Social Research, 67 374–391.Google Scholar
  9. Gordon, R. A. (1968). Issues in multiple regression.American Journal of Sociology, 73 592–616.Google Scholar
  10. Hallowell, I. (1955).Culture and experience. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  11. Haney, W. G., & Knowles, E. S. (1978). Perception of neighborhoods by city and suburban residents.Human Ecology, 6 201–214.Google Scholar
  12. Hunter, A. (1974).Symbolic communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hunter, A. (1978). The persistence of local sentiments in mass society. In D. Street (Ed.),Handbook of contemporary urban life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  14. Keller, S. (1968).The urban neighborhood. New York, NY: Random.Google Scholar
  15. Kerlinger, F. N., & Pedhazur, E. J. (1973).Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Kotler, M. (1969).Neighborhood government. New York, NY: Bobbs Merrill.Google Scholar
  17. McKenzie, R. D. (1923).The neighborhood: A study of local life in the city of Columbus, Ohio. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Newman, O. (1972).Defensible space. New York, NY: McMillan.Google Scholar
  19. Rapoport, A. (1977).Human aspects of urban form. New York, NY: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  20. Relph, E. (1976).Place and placelessness. London: Pion Limited.Google Scholar
  21. Riger, S., & Lavrakas, P. J. (1981). Community ties: Patterns of attachment and social interaction in urban neighborhoods.American Journal of Community Psychology, 9 55–66.Google Scholar
  22. Rockwell, R. C. (1975). Assessment of multicollinearity: The Haitovsky test of the determinant.Sociological Methods and Research, 3 308–320.Google Scholar
  23. Ross, H. L. (1962). The local community: A survey approach.American Sociological Review, 27 75–84.Google Scholar
  24. Shumaker, S. A., & Taylor, R. B. (1983). Toward a clarification of people-place relationships: A model of attachment to place. In N. Feimer & E. S. Geller (Eds.),Environmental psychology: Directions and perspectives. New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
  25. Stokols, D. (1977). Origins and direction of environment-behavior research. In D. Stokols (Ed.),Perspectives on environment and behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
  26. Stokols, D., & Shumaker, S. A. (1981). People in places: A Transactional view of settings. In J. Harvey (Ed.),Cognition, social behavior, and the environment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Suttles, G. D. (1972).The social construction of communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Taylor, R. B. (1982). The neighborhood-level physical environment and stress-related impacts. In G. W. Evans (Ed.),Environment and Stress. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Taylor, R. B. (in press). Toward an environmental psychology of disorder. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.),Handbook of Environmental Psychology. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Taylor, R. B., & Brower, S. (in press). Home and near home territories. In I. Altman & C. Werner (Eds.),Human behavior and environment, Vol. 8:Home environments. New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
  31. Taylor, R. B., Brower, S., & Drain, W. (1979).Toward a neighborhood based data file: A map of Baltimore neighborhoods. Occasional paper. Baltimore, MD: Center for Metropolitan Planning and Research, The Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
  32. Taylor, R. B., Gottfredson, S. D., & Brower, S. (1980). The defensibility of defensible space. In T. Hirschi & M. Gottfredson (Eds.),Understanding crime. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Taylor, R. B., Gottfredson, S. D., & Brower, S. (1981). Territorial cognitions and social climate in urban neighborhoods.Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2 289–303.Google Scholar
  34. Taylor, R. B., Gottfredson, S. D., & Brower, S. (in press a). Attachment to place: Discriminant validity, and impacts of disorder and diversity.American Journal of Community Psychology. Google Scholar
  35. Taylor, R. B., Brower, S., & Gottfredson, S. D. (in press b). Predicting block crime and fear.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. Google Scholar
  36. Taylor, R. B., Gottfredson, S. D., Brower, S., Drain, W., & Dockett, K. (1980). Toward a resident-based model of community crime prevention: Urban territoriality, social networks, and design.JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10 29 (Ms. No. 2044).Google Scholar
  37. Taylor, R. B., Gottfredson, S. D., & Shumaker, S. A. (1984).Neighborhood responses to disorder. Unpublished final report (Grant 80-IJ-CX-0077, National Institute of Justice). Baltimore, MD: Center for Metropolitan Planning and Research.Google Scholar
  38. Thorndike, G. L. (1939). On the fallacy of imputing the correlations found for groups to the individuals in smaller groups composing them.American Journal of Psychology, 52 122–124.Google Scholar
  39. Unger, D., & Wandersman, A. (1983) Neighboring and its role in block organizations: An exploratory report.American Journal of Community Psychology, 11 (3), 291–300.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ralph B. Taylor
    • 1
  • Stephen D. Gottfredson
    • 1
  • Sidney Brower
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Criminal JusticeTemple UniversityUSA
  2. 2.School of Social Work and Community PlanningUniversity of MarylandBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations