Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 88, Issue 6–7, pp 770–774 | Cite as

Gene dispersal from transgenic potatoes to conspecifics: a field trial

  • Io Skogsmyr
Article

Abstract

Transgenic potatoes containing the marker genes NTP II and GUS were planted in the field and at varying distances (0–1, 1–2, 2–3, 10, 100 and 11000 m) from them were patches of untransformed potatoes of another variety. All seeds produced by the untransformed potatoes were collected after the flowering season and screened for the presence of the marker genes. Gene dispersal was found to be highest in the immediate vicinity (72%). At the consecutive distances the presence of the gene was more or less constant (35%). Thus gene dispersal occurred both over large distances and to a higher extent than has been previously shown. Pollinator availability, as well as the foraging behaviour of the pollinators, are suggested to be important in this study. The plant material used is discussed in the light of sexually selected traits which could have contributed to the high gene dispersal.

Key words

Solanum tuberosum Pollen transmission Sexual selection Pollinator behaviour 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Colwell RK, Norse EA, Pimentel D, Sharpies PE, Simberloff D (1985) Genetic engineering in agriculture. Science 229:111–112Google Scholar
  2. Crawley MJ, Hails RS, Rees M, Kohn D, Buxton J (1993) Ecology of transgenic oilseed rape in natural habitats. Nature 363:620–623Google Scholar
  3. Dale PJ, McPartlan HC, Parkingson R, MacKey GR, Scheffler JA (1990) Gene dispersal from transgenic crops by pollen. In: Casper R, Landsmann J (ed) Proc of the 2nd Int Symp on the biosafety results on field tests of genetically modified plants and microorganisms. Biologische Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Braunschweig, Germany, 73–78Google Scholar
  4. Elllstrand NC (1988) Pollen as a vehicle for the escape of engineered genes? In Hodgson J, Sugden AM (ed) Trends Biochem Sci Special publication, Elsevier, Cambridge, England, S30-S32Google Scholar
  5. Ellstrand NC, Hoffman CA (1990) Hybridization as an avenue for escape of engineered genes. BioScience 40:438–442Google Scholar
  6. Gasser CS, Fraley RT (1989) Genetically engineered plants for crop improvement. Science 244:1293–1299Google Scholar
  7. Gliddon C (1992) Monitoring of organisms in the environment. Implications of the international symposia on the biosafety results on field tests of genetically modified plants and microorganisms at Kiawah Island November 1990 and Goslar May 1992. University of Bangor, UKGoogle Scholar
  8. Goodman RM, Newell N (1985) Genetic engineering for plant herbicide resistance: status and prospect. In: Halvorson HO, Pramer D, Rogul M (ed) Engineered organisms in the environment: scientific issues. American Society of Microbiology, Washington D.C., 47–53Google Scholar
  9. Heinrich B (1979) “Majoring” and “minoring” by foraging bumblebeesBombus vegans: an experimental analysis. Ecology 60:245–255Google Scholar
  10. Karieva P (1993) Transgenic plants on trial. Nature 363:580–581Google Scholar
  11. Klinger T, Elan DR, Ellstrand NC (1991) Radish as a model system for the study of engineered gene escape rates via crop-weed mating. Conserv Biol 5:531–535Google Scholar
  12. Levin DA (1971) Pollen exchange as a function of species proximity inPlox. Evolution 26:252–258Google Scholar
  13. Regal PJ (1988) The adaptive potential of genetically engineered organisms in nature. In: Hodgson J, Sugden AM (eds). Trends Biochem Sci, Special publication. Elsevier, Cambridge, England, S36-S38Google Scholar
  14. Ross A (1986) Potato breeding: problems and perspectives. Parey, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  15. Schmitt JB (1980) Pollinator foraging behaviour and gene dispersal inSenecio. Evolution 34:934–943Google Scholar
  16. Skogsmyr I (1992) Pollen carry-over as a result of the proportion of the pollen load being exchanged at each visit: a model. In: Skogsmyr I. Pollination biology, venereal diseases and allocation conflicts in plants. PhD thesis, University of Lund, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  17. Tiedje JM, Colwell RK, Grossman YL, Hodson RE, Lenski RE, Mack RN, Regal PJ (1989) The planned introduction of genetically engineered organisms: ecological consideration and recommendations. Ecology 70:298–315Google Scholar
  18. Thomson JD, Barret SCH (1981) Selection for outcrossing, sexual selection and the evolution of dioecy in plants. Am Nat 118:443–449Google Scholar
  19. Tynan JL, Williams MK, Conner AJ (1990) Low frequency of pollen dispersal from a field trail of transgenic potatoes. J Gen Breed 44:303–306Google Scholar
  20. Williamson M (1988) Potential effects of recombinant DNA organisms on ecosystems and their components. Trends Ecol Evol 3:32–35Google Scholar
  21. Willson MF, Burley N (1983) Mate choice in plants. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  22. Wolfe LM, Barrett SCH (1987) Pollinator foraging behaviour and pollen collection on the floral morphs of tristylousPontederia cordata L. Oecologia 74:347–351Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Io Skogsmyr
    • 1
  1. 1.Theoretical ecology, Ecology buildingLundSweden

Personalised recommendations