, Volume 58, Issue 3, pp 483–492 | Cite as

The effect of p-chloromercuribenzoate on rotational protoplasmic streaming in plant cells

  • Shigemi Abe


  1. (1)

    The effect of p-chloromercuribenzoate (PCMB), a highly specific sulfhydryl reagent, on the rotational protoplasmic streaming in plant cells was studied. Materials used were; internodal cells ofNitella flexilis, leaf cells ofElodea densa, root hair cells ofHydrocharis Morsus ranae and stamen hair cells ofTradescantia reflexa.

  2. (2)

    The response of the rotational protoplasmic streaming to PCMB were all alike in these plant cells: First, streaming was retarded and ceased within a short time with PCMB in a suitable concentration; second, streaming was restored completely or fairly well through subsequent application of cysteine at a concentration higher than that of PCMB; third, when its activity to block -SH groups was eliminated with cysteine in advance. PCMB exerted no effect on the streaming.

  3. (3)

    As it is well known that PCMB is bound to -SH groups with high specificity, it is reasonable to conclude that the cessation and recovery of streaming are closely related to the blocking and liberation of -SH groups in the protoplasm.

  4. (4)

    Specificity of the action of PCMB for -SH groups was further confirmed through the application of L-serine, HOCH2·CH(NH2)·COOH against L-cysteine, HSCH2·CH(NH2)·COOH.

  5. (5)

    Though found only once, reversal of the streaming direction was observed in an internodal cell ofNitella.



Cysteine Plant Cell High Specificity Hair Cell Root Hair 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abe, S., 1959: Rotational protoplasmic streaming and SH. Kagaku (Science)29, 361–362 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  2. Barren, E. S. G., 1951: Thiol groups of biological importance. Advances in Enzymol.11, 201–266.Google Scholar
  3. De Robertis, E., and C. A. Peluffo, 1951: Chemical stimulation and inhibition of bacterial motility studied with a new method. Proc. Soc. exper. Biol. Med.78, 584–589.Google Scholar
  4. Kishimoto, U., and H. Akabori, 1959: Protoplasmic streaming ofNitella flexilis. Its correlation with electrical stimulus. J. Gen. Physiol.42, 1167–1183.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Olcott, H. S., and H. Fraenkel-Conrat, 1947: Specific group reagents for proteins. Chem. Rev.41, 151–197.Google Scholar
  6. Smirnova, N. A., 1955: Reversible changes of protoplasmic flow inElodea under blocking and recorvery of sulfhydryl groups. Fiziologia Rastenii2, 578–580 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  7. Zurzycki, J., 1951: The influence of temperature on the protoplasmic streaming inElodea densa Casp. Acta Soc. Bot. Poloniae21, 241–264 (in Polish with English summary).Google Scholar
  8. —, 1958: An apparatus for continuous recording of protoplasmic streaming. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia, série: botanique1, 123–129.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1964

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shigemi Abe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceOsaka UniversityJapan

Personalised recommendations