Protoplasma

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 552–559 | Cite as

Aniline blue and fluorescence microscopy of callose in bulb scales ofAllium cepa L

  • H. B. Currier
  • Siegfried Strugger
Abhandlungen

Summary

  1. 1.

    The fluorescence-microscopic method is used in which substances of callose nature appear yellow when stained with water-soluble aniline blue.

     
  2. 2.

    Callose in sieve tubes and in other reported locations is clearly revealed, and it also appears in primary pit fields of parenchyma cells. It is especially evident in the anticlinal walls ofAllium epidermis.

     
  3. 3.

    The formation of callose, as judged by intensity of fluorescence, is increased by wound stimulation. Limited at first to pit fields, spreading can occur later.

     
  4. 4.

    Once formed, the pit callose is stable to plasmolysis, boiling water, and chemical fixation.

     
  5. 5.

    A major function of callose in plants is considered to be a sealing or plugging action, although there appear to be other functions.

     
  6. 6.

    The presence of callose in parenchymatous walls is further evidence of the close relationship between sieve fields and primary pit fields.

    This work was carried out during the winter of 1954–55 at Münster, where the first author, as a Guggenheim Fellow, was a guest of the Botanisches Institut.

     

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arens, K., 1949: Provo de calose por meio da microscopia a luz fluorescentc e applicacoes do metodo. Lilloa18, 71–75.Google Scholar
  2. Cheadle, V. I., E. M. Gifford, and K. Esau, 1953: A staining combination for phloem and contiguous tissues. Stain Techn.28, 49–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Esau, K., 1939: Development and structure of the phloem tissue. Bot. Rev.5, 373–432.Google Scholar
  4. Eschrich, W., 1954: Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Kallose. Planta44, 532–542.Google Scholar
  5. Küster, E., 1929: Pathologie der Pflanzenzelle. Borntraeger, Berlin.Google Scholar
  6. —, 1951: Die Pflanzenzelle. Fischer, Jena.Google Scholar
  7. Mangin, L., 1889: Observations sur la membrane du grain de pollen mûr. Bull. Soc. Bot. France36, 274–284.Google Scholar
  8. —, 1892: Observations sur la présence de la callose chez les phanérogames. Bull. Soc. Bot. France39, 260–267.Google Scholar
  9. —, 1910: Nouvelles observations sur la callose. C. r. Acad. Sci. Paris151, 279–283.Google Scholar
  10. Nägeli, C. W., 1861: Über die Siebröhren vonCucurbita. S.ber. bayer. Akad. Wiss.1, 212–258.Google Scholar
  11. Rendle, A. B., 1889: On the vesicular vessels of the onion. Ann. Bot.3, 169–177.Google Scholar
  12. Strugger, S., 1938: Die lumineszenzmikroskopische Analyse des Transpirationsstromes in Parenchymen. 1. Mitt. Die Methode und die ersten Beobachtungen. Flora133, 56.Google Scholar
  13. —, 1939: Die lumineszenzmikroskopische Analyse des Transpirationsstromes in Parenchymen. 3. Mitt. UntersuchungenHelxine Soleirolii Req. Biol. Zbl.59, 409.Google Scholar
  14. - 1949: Praktikum der Zell- und Gewebephysiologie der Pflanze. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1956

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. B. Currier
    • 1
    • 2
  • Siegfried Strugger
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of CaliforniaDavis
  2. 2.Botanisches InstitutUniversität MünsterDeutschland

Personalised recommendations