Conditioning of morphine-induced locomotor activity and stereotyped behaviour in rats

  • S. Walter
  • K. Kuschinsky
Original Papers


Morphine (15 mg/kg i.p.) produces a biphasic effect: hypokinesia, followed by hyperkinesia and stereotyped behaviour. After repeated administration, the signs of the second phase more and more predominate. In the following study, it was evaluated, to which degree “classical” pharmacodynamic tolerance to hypokinesia or, alternatively, conditioning phenomena contribute to this shift. In particular, it was studied whether not only hyperkinesia but also stereotypies could occur as conditioned responses either in the presence or in absence of morphine. Rats were conditioned 8 times with morphine (15 mg/ kg i.p.) in the presence of various, defined conditioned stimuli (auditory, olfactory and tactile), another group was “pseudoconditioned”, i.e. they were exposed to the same treatment schedule of morphine and stimuli, but with no positive association between drug and stimuli, a third group (“naive rats”) was treated with saline instead of morphine, but exposed to the same stimuli as both other groups. All groups were tested for conditioned responses in the presence of the conditioned stimuli. One series of experiments was performed with saline after a break of 2 days after the end of the conditioning period, a second series was tested with saline after a break of 7 days, a third series with morphine (15 mg/kg i.p.) after a break of 2 days, a fourth series with the same dose of morphine after a break of 7 days. The results showed that when morphine was used after a break of 2 days, “classical” pharmacodynamic tolerance, but not conditioning phenomena could explain the shift in behaviour, whereas under the three other protocols described, some conditioned behavioural effects could be observed, either in presence or in absence of morphine, at least in part of the parameters used (locomotor activation, decrease in hypokinesia, sniffing, gnawing, rearing, but not in licking). Accordingly, development of pharmacodynamic tolerance and, to a lesser degree, conditioning contribute to the shift in behaviour after repeated administration of morphine. The conditioned effects could not be attributed to any alteration in striatal or mesolimbic dopamine turnover.


Morphine conditioned effects hyperkinesia stereotyped behaviour 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ayhan IH, Randrup A (1973) Behavioural and pharmacological studies on morphineinduced excitation of rats. Possible relation to brain catecholamines. Psychopharmacologia (Berlin) 29: 317–328Google Scholar
  2. Barr GA, Sharpless NS, Cooper S, Schiff SR, Paredes W, Bridger WH (1983) Classical conditioning, decay and extinction of cocaine-induced hyperactivity and stereotypy. Life Sci 33: 1341–1352Google Scholar
  3. Bartoletti M, Gaiardi M, Gubellini C, Bacchi A, Babbini M (1987) Previous treatment with morphine and sensitization to the excitatory actions of opiates: dose-effect relationship. Neuropharmacology 26: 115–119Google Scholar
  4. Broekkamp CLE, Phillips AG, Cools AR (1979) Stimulant effects of enkephalin microinjection into the dopaminergic A 10 area. Nature 278: 560–562Google Scholar
  5. Cools AR, Broekkamp CLE, van Rossum JM (1977) Subcutaneous injections of apomorphine, stimulus generalization and conditioning: serious pitfalls for the examiner using apomorphine as a tool. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 6: 705–708Google Scholar
  6. Ellinwood jr EH (1971) “Accidental conditioning” with chronic methamphetamine intoxication: implications for a theory of drug habituation. Psychopharmacologia (Berlin) 21: 131–138Google Scholar
  7. Gunne LM (1963) Catecholamines and 5-hydroxytryptamine in morphine tolerance and withdrawal. Acta Physiol Scand 58 [Suppl 204]: 1–91Google Scholar
  8. Havemann U, Kuschinsky K (1982) Neurochemical aspects of the opioid-induced “catatonia”. Neurochem Internat 4: 199–215Google Scholar
  9. Iwamato ET, Way EL (1977) Circling behaviour and stereotypy induced by intranigral opiate microinjections. J Pharmacol Exper Ther 203: 347–359Google Scholar
  10. Jacquet Y (1978) “Opioid” behavioural effects following ACTH or Β-endorphin injections in periaqueductal gray of drug-naive rats: a dual mechanism of drug dependence? In: van Ree JM, Terenius L (eds) Characterization and function of opioids. Elsevier North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 429–430Google Scholar
  11. JoËl E, Ettinger A (1926) Zur Pathologie der Gewöhnung. III. Mitteilung: Experimentelle Studien über Morphingewöhnung. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Exper Pathol Pharmakol 115: 334–350Google Scholar
  12. Joyce EM, Iversen SD (1979) The effect of morphine applied locally to mesencephalic dopamine cell bodies on spontaneous motor activity in the rat. Neurosci Lett 14: 207–212Google Scholar
  13. Kalivas PW, Duffy P (1987) Sensitization to repeated morphine injection in the rat— possible involvement of A 10 dopamine neurons. J Pharmacol Exper Therap 241: 204–212Google Scholar
  14. Kamat KA, Dutta SN, Pradhan SN (1974) Conditioning of morphine-induced enhancement of motor activity. Res Communic Chem Pathol Pharmacol 7: 367–374Google Scholar
  15. Kuschinsky K (1975) Dopamine receptor sensitivity after repeated morphine administration to rats. Life Sci 17: 43–48Google Scholar
  16. Möller HG, Nowak K, Kuschinsky K (1987) Conditioning of pre- and postsynaptic behavioural responses to the dopamine receptor agonist apomorphic in rats. Psychopharmacology 91: 50–55Google Scholar
  17. Mucha RF, Volkovskis C, Kalant H (1981) Conditioned increases in locomotor activity produced with morphine as an unconditioned stimulus, and the relation of conditioning to acute morphine effect and tolerance. J Comp Physiol Psychol 95: 351–362Google Scholar
  18. Perez-Cruet J (1976) Conditioning of striatal dopamine metabolism with methadone, morphine or bulbocapnine as an unconditioned stimulus. Pavlovian J Biol Science 11: 237–250Google Scholar
  19. Pert A, Sivit C (1977) Neuroanatomical focus for morphine and enkephalin-induced hypermotility. Nature 265: 645–647Google Scholar
  20. Pihl RO, Altmann J (1971) An experimental analysis of the placebo-effect. J Clin Pharmacol 11: 91–95Google Scholar
  21. Schiff SR (1982) Conditioned dopaminergic activity. Biol Psychiat 17: 135–154Google Scholar
  22. Siegel S (1976) Morphine analgesic tolerance: its situation specificity supports a Pavlovian conditioning model. Science 193: 323–326Google Scholar
  23. Ungerstedt U (1979) Central dopamine mechanisms and unconditioned behaviour. In: Horn AS, Korf J, Westerink BHC (eds) The Neurobiology of dopamine. Academic Press, London, pp 577–596Google Scholar
  24. Vezina P, Stewart J (1984) Conditioning and place-specific sensitization of increase in activity induced by morphine in the VTA. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 20: 925–934Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Walter
    • 1
  • K. Kuschinsky
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of PharmacyUniversity of MarburgMarburgFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations