Protoplasma

, Volume 61, Issue 3–4, pp 277–293 | Cite as

On the ultrastructure of cambium and its vascular derivatives

II. Secondary phloem ofPinusstrobus L.
  • Lalit M. Srivastava
  • T. P. O'Brien
Article
Received:

Keywords

Vascular Derivative 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbe, L. B., and A. S. Crafts, 1939: Phloem of white pine and other coniferous species. Bot. Gaz.100, 695–722.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, I. W., 1930: The cambium and its derivative tissues. V. A reconnaissance of the vacuome in living cells. Z. Zellforsch. mikrosk. Anat.10, 651–682.Google Scholar
  3. Bouck, G. B., and J. Cronshaw, 1965: The fine structure of differentiating sieve tube elements. J. Cell Biol.25 (1), 79–96.Google Scholar
  4. Buvat, R., 1963: Les infrastructures et la differenciation des cellules criblées deCucurbita pepo L. Port. Acta Biol.7 (Ser. A) 249–299.Google Scholar
  5. Cronshaw, J., 1965: In “Cellular Ultrastructure of Woody Plants” (W. A. Côté, Jr., Ed.) 99–124. Syracuse University Press. Syracuse N. Y.Google Scholar
  6. — and G. B. Bouck, 1965: The fine structure of differentiating xylem elements. J. Cell Biol.24 (3), 415–431.Google Scholar
  7. Duloy, M., F. V. Mercer, and N. Rathgeber, 1961: Studies in translocation. II. Submicroscopic anatomy of the phloem. Aust. J. Biol. Sci.14, 506–518.Google Scholar
  8. Engleman, E. M., 1965 a: Sieve element ofImpatiens sultanii. 1. Wound reaction. Ann. Bot. N. S.29, 85–101.Google Scholar
  9. —, 1965 b: Sieve element ofImpatiens sultanii. 2. Developmental aspects. Ann. Bot. N. S.29, 103–118.Google Scholar
  10. Esau, K., 1965 a: “Plant Anatomy” 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  11. — 1965 b: Fixation images of sieve element plastids inBeta. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (U. S. A.)54, 429–437.Google Scholar
  12. — and V. I. Cheadle, 1965: Cytologie studies on phloem. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot.36, 253–344.Google Scholar
  13. — — and E. B. Risley, 1962: Development of sieve plate pores. Bot. Gaz.123, 233–243.Google Scholar
  14. Eschrich, W., 1963: Beziehungen zwischen dem Auftreten der Callose und der Feinstruktur des primären phloems beiCucurbita ficifolia. Planta59, 243–261.Google Scholar
  15. Evert, R. F., and W. F. Derr, 1964: Callose substance in sieve elements. Amer. J. Bot.51, 552–559.Google Scholar
  16. — and L. Murmanis, 1965: Ultrastructure of the secondary phloem ofTilia americana. Amer. J. Bot.52, 95–106.Google Scholar
  17. Falk, H., 1964: Zur Herkunft des Siebröhrenschleimes beiTetragonia expansa Murr. Planta60, 558–567.Google Scholar
  18. Gunning, B. E. S., 1965: The fine structure of chloroplast stroma following aldehyde osmium-tetroxide fixation. J. Cell Biol.24, 79–93.Google Scholar
  19. Hepler, P. K., and E. H. Newcomb, 1964: Microtubules and fibrils in the cytoplasm ofColeus cells undergoing secondary wall deposition. J. Cell Biol.20, 529–533.Google Scholar
  20. Hill, A. W., 1901: The histology of the sieve-tubes ofPinus. Ann. Bot.15, 575–611.Google Scholar
  21. Hohl, H.-R., 1960: Über die submikroskopische Struktur normaler und hyperplastischer Gewebe vonDatura stramonium L. I. Normalgewebe. Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges.70, 395–439.Google Scholar
  22. Huber, B., and W. Liese, 1963: Untersuchungen über den Feinbau des sekundären Phloems. I.Larix decidua Mill. Protoplasma57, 429–439.Google Scholar
  23. Jacobson, A. B., H. Swift, and L. Bogorad, 1963: Cytochemical studies concerning the occurrence and distribution of RNA in plastids of ZeaMays. J. Cell Biol.17, 557–570.Google Scholar
  24. Kollmann, R., 1964: On the fine structure of the sieve element protoplast. Phytomorphology14, 247–264.Google Scholar
  25. —, 1965: Zur Lokalisierung der funktionstüchtigen Siebzellen im sekundären Phloem vonMetasequoia glyptosiroboides. Planta65, 173–180.Google Scholar
  26. — and W. Schumacher, 1963: Über die Feinstruktur des Phloems vonMetasequoia glyptostroboides und seine jahreszeitlichen Veränderungen. IV. Weitere Beobachtungen zum Feinbau der Plasmabrücken in den Siebzellen. Planta60, 360–389.Google Scholar
  27. — —, 1964: Über die Feinstruktur des Phloems vonMetasequoia glyptostroboides und seine jahreszeitlichen Veränderungen. V. Die Differenzierung der Siebzellen im Verlaufe einer Vegetationsperiode. Planta63, 155–190.Google Scholar
  28. Ledbetter, M. C., and K. R. Porter, 1963: A “microtubule” in plant cell fine structure. J. Cell Biol.19, 239–250.Google Scholar
  29. Livingston, L. G., 1964: The nature of plasmodesmata in normal (living) plant tissue. Amer. J. Bot.51, 950–957.Google Scholar
  30. Srivastava, L. M., 1963: Secondary Phloem in the Pinaceae. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot.36, 1–142.Google Scholar
  31. — and T. P. O'Brien, 1966: On the ultrastructure of cambium and its vascular derivatives. I. Cambium ofPinus Strobus L. Protoplasma61, 257–276.Google Scholar
  32. Strasburger, E., 1891: Über den Bau und die Verrichtungen der Leitungsbahnen in den Pflanzen. Vol. 3 (Histologische Beiträge). 1000 pp. Jena, Fischer.Google Scholar
  33. Zimmermann, M. H., 1960: Transport in the phloem. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol.11, 167–190.Google Scholar
  34. — 1964: Sap movements in trees. Biorheology2, 15–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lalit M. Srivastava
    • 1
  • T. P. O'Brien
    • 1
  1. 1.The Biological LaboratoriesHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations