Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 263–283 | Cite as

Application of the finite-element method for the forward and inverse models in optical tomography

  • M. Schweiger
  • S. R. Arridge
  • D. T. Delpy


The development of an optical tomographic imaging system for biological tissue based on time-resolved near-infrared transillumination has received considerable interest recently. The reconstruction problem is ill posed because of scatter-dominated photon propagation, and hence it requires both an accurate and fast transport model and a robust solution convergence scheme. The iterative image recovery algorithm described in this paper uses a numerical finite-element solution to the diffusion equation as the photon propagation model. The model itself is used to compare the influence of absorbing and scattering inhomogeneities embedded in a homogeneous tissue sample on boundary measurements to estimate the possibility of separating absorption and scattering images. Images of absorbers and scatterers reconstructed from both mean-time-of-flight and logarithmic intensity data are presented. It is found that mean-time-of-flight data offer increased resolution for reconstructing the scattering coefficient, whereas intensity data are favorable for reconstructing absorption.

Key words

near-infrared imaging diffusion approximation finite-element method image reconstruction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J.E. Brazy, D.V. Lewis, M.H. Mitnick, and F.F. Jöbsis van der Vliet, “Noninvasive monitoring of cerebral oxygenation in preterm infants: Preliminary observations,”Paediatrics, vol. 75, pp. 217–225, 1985.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.S. Wyatt, M. Cope, D.T. Delpy, S. Wray, and E.O.R. Reynolds, “Quantitation of cerebral oxygenation and haemodynamics in sick newborn infants by near infrared spectroscopy,”Lancet, vol. 2, pp. 1063–1066, 1986.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A.D. Edwards, J.S. Wyatt, C.E. Richardson, D.T. Delpy, M. Cope, and E.O.R. Reynolds, “Cotside measurement of cerebral blood flow in ill newborn infants by near infrared spectroscopy,”Lancet, vol. 2, pp. 770–771, 1988.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Ferrari, E. Zanette, I. Giannini, G. Sideri, C. Fieschi, and A. Carpi, “Effects of carotid artery compression test on regional cerebral blood volume, haemoglobin oxygen saturation and cytochrome-c-oxidase redox level in cerebrovascular patients,” inOxygen Transport to Tissue VIII, I.A. Longmuir, ed. Plenum Press: New York, 1986, pp. 213–222.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    N.B. Hampson and C.A. Piantadosi, “Near infrared monitoring of human skeletal muscle oxygenation during forearm ischaemia,”J. Appl. Physiol, vol. 64, pp. 2449–2457, 1988.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T.R. Cheatle, L.A. Potter, M. Cope, D.T. Delpy, P.D. Coleridge-Smith, and J.H. Scurr, “Near infra-red spectroscopy in peripheral vascular disease”Br. J. Surg., vol. 78, pp. 405–408, 1991.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Cope and D.T. Delpy, “System for long term measurement of cerebral blood and tissue oxygenation on newborn infants by near infrared transillumination,”Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., vol. 26, pp. 289–294, 1988.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D.T. Delpy, M. Cope, P. van der Zee, S.R. Arridge, S. Wray, and J. Wyatt, “Estimation of optical pathlength through tissue from direct time of flight measurement,”Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 33, pp. 1433–1442, 1988.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.R. Arridge, M. Cope, P. van der Zee, P.J. Hillson, and D.T. Delpy, “Visualisation of the oxygenation state of brain and muscle in newborn infants by near infrared transillumination,” inInformation Processing in Medical Imaging, S.L. Bacharach, ed., Martinus Nijhoff: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1985, pp. 155–176.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S.R. Arridge, P. van der Zee, D.T. Delpy, and M. Cope, “Aspects of clinical infra red absorption imaging,” inThe Formation, Handling, and Evaluation of Medical Images, A. Todd Pokropek and M.A. Viergever, eds., NATO ASI Series F, Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, 1992, pp. 407–418.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S.R. Arridge, P. van der Zee, M. Cope, and D.T. Delpy, “Reconstruction methods for infrared absorption imaging,”Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng., vol. 1431, pp. 204–215, 1991.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.R. Singer, F.A. Grünbaum, P.D. Kohn, and J.P. Zubelli, “Image reconstruction of the interior of bodies that diffuse radiation,”Science, vol. 248, pp. 990–993, 1990.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    F.A. Grünbaum, P.D. Kohn, G.A. Latham, J.R. Singer, and J.P. Zubelli, “Diffuse tomography,”Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng., vol. 1431, pp. 232–238, 1991.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Berg, S. Andersson-Engels, O. Jarlman, and S. Svanberg, “Time-resolved transillumination for medical diagnostics,”Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng., vol. 1431, pp. 110–119, 1991.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Haselgrove, J. Leigh, C. Yee, N.-G. Wang, M. Maris, and B. Chance, “Monte Carlo and diffusion calculations of photon migration in non-infinite highly scattering media,”Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng., vol. 1431, pp. 30–41, 1991.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Y. Wang, J.-H. Chang, R. Aronson, R.L. Barbour, H.L. Graber, and J. Lubowsky, “Imaging of scattering media by diffusion tomography: an iterative perturbation approach,”Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng., vol. 1641, pp. 58–71, 1992.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    S.R. Arridge, M. Cope and D.T. Delpy, “Theoretical basis for the determination of optical pathlength in tissue: temporal and frequency analysis,”Phys. Med Biol., vol. 37, pp. 1531–1560, 1992.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    E.M. Sevick and B. Chance, “Photon migration in a model of the head measured using time and frequency domain techniques: potentials of spectroscopy and imaging,”Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng., vol. 1431, pp. 84–96, 1991.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M.S. Patterson, J.D. Moulton, B.C. Wilson, K.E. Berndt, and J.R. Lakowicz, “Frequency-domain reflectance for the determination of the scattering and optical properties of tissue,”Appl. Opt., vol. 30, pp. 4474–4476, 1991.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M.S. Patterson, B. Chance, and B.C. Wilson, “Time resolved reflectance and transmittance for the noninvasive measurement of tissue optical properties,”Appl. Opt., vol. 28, pp. 2331–2336, 1989.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    S.R. Arridge, P. van der Zee, M. Cope, and D.T. Delpy, “New results for the development of infra-red absorption imaging,”Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng., vol. 1245, pp. 91–103, 1990.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M.S. Patterson, B.C. Wilson, and D.R. Wyman, “The propagation of optical radiation in tissue 1: models of radiation transport and their application,”Lasers Med. Sci., vol. 6, pp. 155–168, 1991.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. Chandrasekhar,Radiation Transfer, Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1950.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    M.C. Case and P.F. Zweifel,Linear Transport Theory, Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1967.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    B.C. Wilson and G. Adam, “A Monte-Carlo model for the absorption and flux distribution of light in tissue,”Med. Phys., vol. 10, pp. 824–830, 1983.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    P. van der Zee and D.T. Delpy, “Simulation of the pointspread function for light in tissue,”Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., vol. 215, pp. 179–192, 1987.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    S.T. Flock, M.S. Patterson, B.C. Wilson, and D.R. Wyman, “Monte Carlo modelling of light propagation in highly scattering tissues I: model predictions and comparison with diffusion theory,”IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. BME-36, pp. 1162–1168, 1989.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    R.F. Bonner, R. Nossal, R. Havlin, and G.H. Weiss, “Model for photon migration in turbid biological media,”J. Opt. Soc. Am. vol. 4, pp. 423–432, 1987.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    H. Bremmer, “Random volume scattering,”Radio Sci. J. Res., vol. 680, pp. 967–981, 1964.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    H.W. Lewis, “Multiple scattering in an infinite medium,”Phys. Rev., vol. 78, pp. 526–529, 1950.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    R.A.J. Groenhuis, H.A. Ferwada, and J.J. Ten Bosch, “Scattering and absorption of turbid materials determined from reflection measurements” (parts 1 and 2),Appl. Opt., vol. 28, pp. 2456–2467, 1983.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    M. Schweiger, S.R. Arridge, M. Hiraoka, and D.T. Delpy, “Application of the finite element method for the forward model in infra-red absorption imaging,”Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng., vol. 1768, pp. 97–108, 1992.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    C. Greenough and K. Robinson,Finite Element Library, Numerical Algorithms Group: Downers Grove, IL, 1981.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    S.R. Arridge, M. Schweiger, M. Hiraoka, and D.T. Delpy, “A finite element approach for modelling photon transport in tissue,”Med. Phys., 1993, to appear.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    T.J. Yorkey, J.G. Webster, and W.J. Tompkins, “Comparing reconstruction techniques for electrical impedance tomography,”IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. BME-34, pp. 843–852, 1987.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    S.R. Arridge, M. Schweiger, and D.T. Delpy, “Iterative reconstruction of near infra-red absorption images,”Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng., vol. 1767, pp. 372–383, 1992.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    S.R. Arridge, M. Schweiger, and D.T. Delpy, “Performance of an iterative reconstruction algorithm for near-IR absorption and scatter imaging,”Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum., vol. 1888, 1993, to appear.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    R.V. Kohn and A. McKenney, “Numerical implementation of a variational method for electrical impedance tomography,”Inverse Problems, vol. 6, pp. 389–414, 1990.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Schweiger
    • 1
  • S. R. Arridge
    • 2
  • D. T. Delpy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medical Physics and BioengineeringUniversity College LondonLondonEngland
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonEngland

Personalised recommendations