CHEMOECOLOGY

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 39–45 | Cite as

Form-specific fragances fromOphrys insectifera L. (Orchidaceae) attract species of different pollinator genera. Evidence of sympatric speciation?

  • Anna-Karin Borg-Karlson
  • Inga Groth
  • Lennart Ågren
  • Bertil Kullenberg

Abstract

Two closely related forms ofOphrys insectifera were observed in the field to attract different pollinator species selectively.O. i. ssp.insectifera attracted males of two species ofArgogorytes (Sphecidae, Hymenoptera Aculeata) andO. i. ssp.aymoninii attractedAndrena combinata males (Andrenidae, Apoidea, Hymenoptera Aculeata). A third form,O. aff.i. ssp.insectifera, attracted none of these three species. Volatile compounds from flowers and inflorescences of the three forms (originating from Öland, Sweden, and Aveyron, France) were collected, using entrainment, enfleurage, and solvent extraction techniques, and identified by gas chromatography — mass spectrometry. Scent differences between the three forms were confirmed in the amounts of aliphatic hydrocarbons (C11–C19), methyl esters (C14–C18), short chain aliphatic 1-alcohols (C6–C12), and monoterpene alcohols (C10).

Key words

pollination semiochemicals attractants aliphatic alcohols aliphatic hydrocarbons aliphatic methyl esters linalool Hymenoptera Aculeata Andrena Argogorytes Orchidaceae Ophrys Osmia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ågren L, Borg-Karlson A-K (1984) Responses ofArgogorytes (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae) males to odor signals fromOphrys insectifera (Orchidaceae). Preliminary EAG and chemical investigation. Nova Acta Reg Soc Sci Upsal Ser V:C3:111–117Google Scholar
  2. Ågren L, Kullenberg B, Sensenbaugh T (1984) Congruences in pilosity between three species ofOphrys (Orchidaceae) and their hymenopteran pollinators. Nova Acta Reg Soc Sci Ser V:C3:15–25Google Scholar
  3. Bergström G, Appelgren M, Borg-Karlson A-K, Groth I, Strömberg S, Strömberg S (1980) Studies of natural odiferous compounds. XXII. Techniques for the isolation/enrichment of plant volatiles in the analyses ofOphrys orchids (Orchidaceae). Chem Scr 16:173–180Google Scholar
  4. Borg-Karlson A-K (1990) Chemical and ethological studies of pollination in the genusOphrys (Orchidaceae). Phytochemistry 29:1359–1387Google Scholar
  5. Borg-Karlson A-K, Tengö J (1986) Odor mimetism? Key substances in theOphrys lutea/Andrena pollination relationship (Orchidaceae-Andrenidae). J Chem Ecol 25:1927–1941Google Scholar
  6. Borg-Karlson A-K, Bergström G, Groth I (1985) Chemical basis for the relationship betweenOphrys orchids and their pollinators. I. Volatile compounds ofOphrys lutea andO. fusca as insect mimetic attractants/excitants. Chem Scr 25:283–294Google Scholar
  7. Borg-Karlson A-K, Bergström G, Kullenberg B (1987) Chemical basis for the relationship betweenOphrys orchids and their pollinators. II. Volatile compounds ofO. insectifera andO. speculum as insect mimetic attractants/excitants. Chem Scr 27:303–311Google Scholar
  8. Breistroffer M (1981) Notes succinctes sur quelques équivalences nomenclaturales d'espèces céveno/caussenardes et description d'une sous-espèce nouvelle d'Orchidée. Bull Soc Bot Fr 128:69–72Google Scholar
  9. Kullenberg B (1950) Investigations on the pollination ofOphrys. Oikos 2:1–19Google Scholar
  10. Kullenberg B (1952) Recherches sur la biologie florale desOphrys. Bull Soc Hist Nat Afr Nord 43:53–62Google Scholar
  11. Kullenberg B (1956) Field experiments with chemical sexual attractants on aculeate Hymenoptera males. Zool Bidrag Uppsala 31:253–354Google Scholar
  12. Kullenberg B (1961) Studies inOphrys pollination. Zool Bidrag Uppsala 34:1–340Google Scholar
  13. Kullenberg B (1973) New observations on the pollination ofOphrys L. (Orchidaceae). Zoon Suppl. 1:9–14Google Scholar
  14. Kullenberg B, Bergström G (1976) Hymenoptera Aculeata males as pollinators ofOphrys orchids. Zool Scr 5:13–23Google Scholar
  15. Paulus HF, Gack C (1981) Neue Beobachtungen zur Bestäubungsbiologie (Pseudokopulation) verschiedener südspanischerOphrys-Arten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des FormenkreisesO. fusca agg. Plant Syst Evol 137:241–258Google Scholar
  16. Paulus HF, Gack C (1983) Untersuchungen desOphrys fusca-Formenkreises in Südspanien. Ein Beitrag zum Biospezieskonzept der GattungOphrys. Die Orchide, Sonderheft 1983:65–72Google Scholar
  17. Tengö J (1979) Chemical signals and odour-released behaviour inAndrena bees (Hym., Andrenidae). Abstr Uppsala Diss Fac Sci 500:1–31Google Scholar
  18. Warncke K, Kullenberg B (1984) Übersicht von Beobachtungen über Besuche vonAndrena- undColletes cunicularius-Männchen aufOphrys-Blüten (Orchidaceae). Nova Acta Reg Soc Sci Upsal Ser V:C3:41–55Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna-Karin Borg-Karlson
    • 1
    • 3
  • Inga Groth
    • 2
    • 3
  • Lennart Ågren
    • 3
  • Bertil Kullenberg
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Organic ChemistryThe Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Department of Chemical EcologyGothenburg UniversityGöteborgSweden
  3. 3.Ecological Research Station of Uppsala UniversityFärjestadenSweden

Personalised recommendations