The equations of Dirac and theM2(ℍ)-representation ofCl1,3
- 50 Downloads
Abstract
In its original form Dirac's equations have been expressed by use of the γ-matrices γμ, μ=0, 1, 2, 3. They are elements of the matrix algebra M 4 (ℂ). As emphasized by Hestenes several times, the γ-matrices are merely a (faithful) matrix representation of an orthonormal basis of the orthogonal spaceℝ1,3, generating the real Clifford algebra Cl 1,3 . This orthonormal basis is also denoted by γμ, μ=0, 1, 2, 3. The use of the matrix algebra M 4 (ℂ) to represent Cl 1,3 has some unsatisfactory aspects. The γ-matrices contain imaginary numbers as entries whereas Cl 1,3 is real. Moreover, as a matrix algebra Cl 1,3 is M 2 (ℍ) but only a part of M 4 (ℂ). For that reason we investigate in this paper several forms of Dirac's equations in terms of M 2 (ℍ) instead of M 4 (ℂ). In Section1 we survey Dirac's equations describing the interaction of matter with electromagnetic, electroweak, and strong fields. Section2 deals with electromagnetic/weak interactions employing M 2 (ℍ). Finally, in Section3 we deal with Dirac's equations for strong interactions between quarks. In contrast to su(2) ⊕ u(1), the Lie algebra su(3) is not isomorphic to any subalgebra of Cl 1,3 . Therefore we do not give a description of strong interactions by use of M 2 (ℍ). Instead of such an approach we describe these interactions using the space of quadruples of bivector fields in Cl 1,3 . The thus obtained description has remarkable formal resemblance to the original Dirac equations using wave functions with values in the linear spaceℂ4.
Keywords
Wave Function Strong Interaction Orthonormal Basis Matrix Representation Dirac EquationPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.E. Artin,Geometric Algebra (Interscience, New York, 1957, 1988).Google Scholar
- 2.D. Bohm,Wholeness and the Implicate Order (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1981).Google Scholar
- 3.F. A. M. Frescura and B. J. Hiley, “The implicate order, algebras, and the spinor.”Found. Phys. 10, 7–31 (1980).Google Scholar
- 4.R. Gurtler and D. Hestenes, “Consistency in the formulation of the Dirac, Pauli, and Schrödinger theories,”J. Math. Phys. 16, 573–584 (1975).Google Scholar
- 5.D. Hestenes,Space-Time Algebra (Gordon & Breach, New York, 1966, 1987).Google Scholar
- 6.D. Hesteness, “Real spinor fields,”J. Math. Phys. 8, 798–808 (1967).Google Scholar
- 7.D. Hestenes, “Vectors, spinors and complex numbers in classical and quantum physics,”Am. J. Phys. 39, 1013–1027 (1971).Google Scholar
- 8.D. Hestenes, “Local observables in the Dirac theory,”J. Math. Phys. 14, 893–905 (1973).Google Scholar
- 9.D. Hestenes, “Observables, operators and complex numbers in the Dirac theory,”J. Math. Phys. 16, 556–572 (1975).Google Scholar
- 10.D. Hesteness, “Space-time structure of weak and electromagnetic interactions,”Found. Phys. 12, 153–168 (1982).Google Scholar
- 11.D. Hestenes, “A unified language for mathematics and physics,” inClifford Algebras and Their Applications in Mathematical Physics (Proceedings, NATO and SERC workshop, 1985) (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986), pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
- 12.D. Hestenes, “Clifford algebra and the interpretation of quantum mechanics,” inClifford Algebras and Their Applications in Mathematical Physics. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986), pp. 321–346.Google Scholar
- 13.D. Hestenes and R. Gurtler, “Local observables in quantum theory,”Am. J. Phys. 39, 1028–1038 (1971).Google Scholar
- 14.I. R. Porteous,Topological Geometry (VNR, 1969) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1981).Google Scholar
- 15.C. Quigg,Gauge Theories of the Strong, Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions Benjamin/Cummings, London, 1983).Google Scholar
- 16.P. G. Vroegindeweij, “The Clifford algebra of space-time applied to field theories. Part I,” EUT Report 87-WSK-03, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 1987.Google Scholar
- 17.P. G. Vroegindeweij, “Algebraic structures on space-time algebra,”Linear Algebra and Its Applications 178, 217–235 (1993).Google Scholar