Innovative Higher Education

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 231–246 | Cite as

Role play simulations: The assessment of an active learning technique and comparisons with traditional lectures

  • Kristina M. DeNeve
  • Mary J. Heppner

Abstract

Although effective teaching is focusing more on the need to use active learning techniques, the research literature regarding the efficacy of various teaching methods is inconclusive. An innovative active learning technique combining the features of role plays and simulations for an industrial psychology course is presented. Subjective reports and objective assessments of knowledge retention measured at two distinct times indicated the role play simulation is an effective teaching technique. The differential importance of active learning and passive learning (i.e., lectures) techniques for the college classroom was also examined. Finally, the application of this technique for several college courses is presented.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bain, A., Hougleton, S., & Carroll, A. (1995). Using interactive video-based modeling to teach social skills: An experimental study.British Journal of Educational Technology, 26, 62–65.Google Scholar
  2. Bin, Y, & Lee, B. (1992). Effects of learning style in a hypermedia instructional system.Proceedings of the Selected Research and Development Presentations at the Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, pg. 5.Google Scholar
  3. Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991).Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Washington, DC: George Washington University.Google Scholar
  4. Bredehoft, D. J. (1991). Cooperative controversies in the classroom.College Teaching, 39, 122–125.Google Scholar
  5. Brookfield, S. D. (1987).Developing critical thinkers: Challenging adults to explore alternate ways of thinking and acting. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Carlson, J. A., & Schodt, D. W. (1995). Beyond the lecture: Case teaching and the learning of economic theory.Journal of Economic Education, 26, 17–28.Google Scholar
  7. Doran, M. S. (1994).The effects of individual, cooperative, and collaborative learning structures using a computer simulation in accounting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
  8. Dori, Y. J., & Yochim, J. M. (1994). Human Physiology: Improving students' achievements through intelligent studyware.Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3, 263–269.Google Scholar
  9. Eble, K. E. (1988).The craft of teaching (2nd Ed.) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Elliot, L. B. (1993). Using debates to teach the psychology of women.Teaching of Psychology, 20, 35–38.Google Scholar
  11. Etemad, M. E. (1994, April).The role of kinesthetics in learning: The importance of active engagement and the connected process of reflection. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 374 887).Google Scholar
  12. Ferguson, E. L., & Hegarty, M. (1995). Learning with real machines or diagrams: Application of knowledge to real-world problems.Cognition and Instruction, 13, 129–160.Google Scholar
  13. Gamson, W. A. (1966).SIMSOC: A manual for participants. Ann Arbor, MI: Campus Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Hilligoss, T. (1992). Demystifying “classroom chemistry”: The role of the interactive learning model.Teaching Sociology, 20, 12–17.Google Scholar
  15. Huryn, J. S. (1986). Debating as a teaching technique.Teaching Sociology, 14, 266–269.Google Scholar
  16. Keller, C. W. (1993). Using book reviews for cooperative learning.College Teaching, 41, 26–28.Google Scholar
  17. King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side.College Teaching, 41, 30–35.Google Scholar
  18. Kritch, K. M., Bostow, D. E., & Dedrick, R. F. (1995). Level of interactivity of videodisc instruction on college students' recall of AIDS information.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 85–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lampe, J. R., & Rooze, G. E. (1994).Enhancing social studies achievement among Hispanic students using cooperative learning work groups. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  20. Lyons, M. J., Bradley, C., & White, J. (1984). Video taping and abnormal psychology: Dramatized clinical interviews.Teaching of Psychology, 11, 41–42.Google Scholar
  21. McKeachie, W. J. (1986).Teaching tips: A guidebook for the beginning college teacher. Lexington, MA: DC. Heath & Co.Google Scholar
  22. Millard, R. J. (1983). A morale survey project as a group activity in an industrial/organizational course.Teaching of Psychology, 10, 110–112.Google Scholar
  23. Ross, S. M., & Smith, L. J. (1994). Effects of the success for all model on kindergarten through second-grade reading achievement, teachers' adjustment, and classroom-school climate at an inner-city school.The Elementary School Journal, 95, 121–138.Google Scholar
  24. Saal, F. E., & Knight, P. A. (1988).Industrial/Organizational psychology: Science and practice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  25. Somers, J. A., & Holt, M. E. (1993). What's in a game? A study of games as an instructional method in an adult education class.Innovative Higher Education, 17, 243–257.Google Scholar
  26. Tuckman, B. W. (1991). Motivating college students: A model based on empirical evidence.Innovative Higher Education, 15, 167–176.Google Scholar
  27. Tudor, R. M., & Bostow, D. E. (1991). Computer-programmed instruction: The relation of required interaction to practical application.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 361–368.Google Scholar
  28. Weaver, R. L., & Cotrell, H. W. (1985). Mental aerobics: The half-sheet response.Innovative Higher Education, 10, 23–31.Google Scholar
  29. Weisz, E. (1990). Energizing the classroom.College Teaching, 38, 74–76.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristina M. DeNeve
  • Mary J. Heppner

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations