Advertisement

CHEMOECOLOGY

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 35–40 | Cite as

Tarsal secretion marks food sources in bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae)

  • Ulrich Schmitt
  • Gunther Lübke
  • Wittko Francke
Research papers

Summary

Scent-marking of artificial food sources by workers of the bumblebee,Bombus terrestris, was investigated. Odour marks deposited on artificial flowers were subsequently collected and chemically analysed. Alkanes and alkenes were identified as the main components. The behaviour mediating capacity of synthetic mixtures of the identified compounds was bioassayed using an artificial flower system. A mixture of alkanes and alkenes, close to natural proportions, released regular foraging behaviour. The reaction proved to be dose-dependent.

Key words

scent-marking tarsal glands hydrocarbons Insecta Hymenoptera Apidae Bombus terrestris 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blum MS (1981) Chemical Defenses of Arthropods. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Blum MS (1987) Specifity of pheromonal signals: a search for its recognitive bases in terms of a unified chemisociality. Pp 401–405in Eder J, Rembold H (eds) Chemistry and Biology of Social Insects. München: J PepernyGoogle Scholar
  3. Brandsma L (1988) Preparative Acetylenic Chemistry. Amsterdam, Oxford, New York, Tokyo: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  4. Brian AD (1952) Division of labour and foraging inBombus agrorum Fabricius. J Anim Ecol 21:223–240Google Scholar
  5. Brown CA, Vijay KA (1973) “P-2 Nickel” catalyst with ethylenediamine, a novel system for highly stereospecific reduction of alkynes to cis-olefines. J Chem Soc: 553–554Google Scholar
  6. Cameron SA (1981) Chemical signals in bumblebee foraging. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:257–260Google Scholar
  7. Carlson DA, Chin-Shyan R, Yost RA, Hector J (1989) Dimethyl disulfide derivates of long chain alkenes, alkadienes, and alkatrienes for gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 61:1564–1571Google Scholar
  8. Cruz-Landim C da, Staurengo MA (1965) Glande tarsale des Abeilles sans aiguillon. Proc V Int Cong IUSSI: Toulouse 219–225Google Scholar
  9. Corbet SA, Kerslake CJC, Brown D, Morland NE (1984) Can bees select nectar rich flowers in a patch? J Apic Res 23:234–242Google Scholar
  10. Ferguson AW, Free JB (1979) Production of a forage-marking pheromone by the honeybee. J Apic Res 18:128–135Google Scholar
  11. Francis GW, Veland K (1981) Alkylthiolation for the determination of double-bond positions in linear alkenes. J Chromatogr 219:379–384Google Scholar
  12. Francke W (1986) Convergency and diversity in multicomponent insect Pheromones. Pp 327–336in Parchet M, Audries JC, Dhainaut A (eds) Advances in Invertebrate Reproduction 4. Amsterdam, Oxford, New York, Tokyo: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  13. Frankie GW, Vinson SB (1977) Scent marking of passion flowers in Texas by females ofXylocopa virginica texana. J Kans Ent Soc 50:613–625Google Scholar
  14. Frisch K von (1923) Über die “Sprache” der Bienen, eine tierpsychologische Untersuchung. Zool Jahrb Abt Allg Zool Physiol 40:1–186Google Scholar
  15. Hagen E von (1986) Hummeln. Melsungen: Neumann-Neudamm VerlagGoogle Scholar
  16. Heinrich B (1976) Resource partitioning among some eusocial insects: bumblebees. Ecology 57:874–889Google Scholar
  17. Jacobs-Jessen UF (1959) Zur Orientierung der Hummeln und einiger anderer Hymenopteren. Z Vergl Physiol 41:597–641Google Scholar
  18. Kato M (1988) Bumble bee visits toImpatiens spp.: Pattern and efficiency. Oecologia 76:364–370Google Scholar
  19. Klimetzek D, Köhler J, Krohn S, Francke W (1989) Das Pheromon-System des Waldreben-BorkenkäfersXylocleptus bispinus Duft. (Col., Scolytidae). J appl Ent 107:304–309Google Scholar
  20. Kullenberg B (1956) Field experiments with chemical sexual attractants on aculeate hymenopteran males. Zool Bidr Upps 31:253–280Google Scholar
  21. Michener CD (1974) The Social Behavior of Bees. Cambridge/MA: BelknapGoogle Scholar
  22. Nunez JA (1967) Sammelbienen markieren versiegte Futterquellen durch Duft. Naturwissenschaften 54:322–323Google Scholar
  23. Schmitt U (1990) Hydrocarbons in tarsal-glands ofBombus terrestris. Experientia 46:1080–1082Google Scholar
  24. Schmitt U, Bertsch A (1990) Do foraging bumblebees scent-mark food sources and does it matter? Oecologia 82:137–144Google Scholar
  25. Sladen FWL (1902) A scent-producing organ in the abdomen of the worker ofApis mellifera. Ent Month Mag 38:208–211Google Scholar
  26. Tengö J, Hefetz A, Bertsch A, Schmitt U, Lübke G, Francke W (1991) Species specifity and complexity of Dufour's gland secretion of bumble bees. Comp Biochem Physiol: in pressGoogle Scholar
  27. Wilhelm T, Pflumm W (1983) Über den Einfluβ blumenhafter Düfte auf das Duftmarkieren der Sammelbiene. Apidologie 14:183–190Google Scholar
  28. Zöfel P (1988) Statistik in der Praxis. Stuttgart: Gustav-Fischer-VerlagGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulrich Schmitt
    • 1
  • Gunther Lübke
    • 2
  • Wittko Francke
    • 2
  1. 1.Fachbereich BiologiePhilipps-UniversitätMarburgFederal Republic of Germany
  2. 2.Institut für Organische Chemie und BiochemieUniversität HamburgHamburgFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations