Advertisement

CHEMOECOLOGY

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 1–7 | Cite as

The two reindeer parasites,Hypoderma tarandi andCephenemyia trompe (Oestridae), have evolved similar olfactory receptor abilities to volatiles from their common host

  • Bjørn Å. Tømmerås
  • Arne C. Nilssen
  • Atle Wibe
Research papers

Summary

Using the linked gas chromatographical/electroantennogram (GC/EAG) technique it was revealed that the reindeer warble fly (H. tarandi) was specifically able to sense the same components from reindeer interdigital pheromone gland as the reindeer nose bot fly (C. trompe) another reindeer endoparasite. These two species belong to the same family (Oestridae), but different subfamilies, and the evolution towards an endoparasitic life cycle is thought to have been independent. The development of olfactory abilities to find reindeer from long distances is hypothesized to have taken place through convergent evolution or exists because of their common ancestry.

Key words

convergent evolution endoparasite host attraction Diptera Cephenemyia trompe Hypoderma tarandi Rangifer tarandus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson JR, Olkowski W (1968) Carbon dioxide as an attractant for host seekingCephenemyia females (Diptera: Oestridae). Nature 220:190–191Google Scholar
  2. Anderson JR, Nilssen A (1985) The ecology and behaviour of the reindeer nose bot fly,Cephenemyia trompe (Modeer) and the reindeer warble fly,Oedemagena tarandi L. (Diptera: Oestridae). (Proc 12th Scand Symp Parasitol) Information (Inst Parasitol Åbo Akademi, Finland) 18:50Google Scholar
  3. Anderson JR, Nilssen A (1990) The method by whichCephenemyia trompe (Modeer) larvae invade reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). Rangifer, special issue # 3:291–297Google Scholar
  4. Andersson G, Brundin A, Andersson K (1979) Volatile compounds from the interdigital gland secretion of reindeer (Rangifer tarandus L.) J Chem Ecol 5:321–333Google Scholar
  5. Bergmann AM (1917) Om renens oestrider. Entomol Tidskr 38:1–32, 113–146Google Scholar
  6. Breyev KA, Karazeeva ZF (1957) Relating to the biology of the warble flyOedemagena tarandi L. III. Observations on the pupa and adult flies. (In Russian). Parazitologiceskij Sbornik Akad. Nauk SSSR. Moska Zoologiceskij muzei 17:199–228Google Scholar
  7. Brundin A, Andersson G (1979) Seasonal variation of three ketones in the interdigital gland secretion of reindeer (Rangifer tarandus L.). J Chem Ecol 5:881–889Google Scholar
  8. Bursell E (1984) Effects of host odour on the behaviour of tsetse. Insect Sci Appl 5:345–349Google Scholar
  9. Colvin J, Gibson G (1992) Host-seeking behavior and management of tsetse. Annu Rev Entomol 37:21–40Google Scholar
  10. Den Otter CJ, Van der Goes van Naters (1990) Single cell recordings from tsetse antennae. Chemical SensesGoogle Scholar
  11. Folstad I, Nilssen AC, Halvorsen O, Andersen J (1989) Why do male reindeer (Rangifer t. tarandus) have higher abundance of second and third instar larvae ofHypoderma tarandi than females? Oikos 55:87–92Google Scholar
  12. Gomoyunova NP (1976) Biologiya ovodov severnykh oleney. (In Russian). Novosibirsk: “Nauka”Google Scholar
  13. Grunin KJ (1964–65) Hypodermatidae. Pp 1–160in Linder E (ed.) Die Fliegen der palaearktischen Region. Vol 8 (64b). D-Stuttgart: Schweizerbart'sche VerlagsbuchhandlungGoogle Scholar
  14. Grunin KJ (1966) Oestridae. Pp 1–97in Linder E (ed.) Die Fliegen der palaearktischen Region. Vol 8 (64a). D-Stuttgart: Schweizerbart'sche VerlagsbuchhandlungGoogle Scholar
  15. Guerin PM, Städler E, Buser HR (1983) Identification of host plant attractants for the carrot fly,Psila rosae. J Chem Ecol 9:843–861Google Scholar
  16. Hadwen S (1927) Notes on the life history ofOedemagena tarandi L. andCephenomyia trompe Modeer. J Parasitology 13:56–65Google Scholar
  17. Hadwen S, Palmer LJ (1922) Reindeer in Alaska. Bulletin 1089. Washington: United States Department of AgricultureGoogle Scholar
  18. Hall DR, Beevor PS, Cork A, Nesbitt BF, Vale GA (1984) 1-octen-3-ol: a potent olfactory stimulant and attractant for tsetse isolated from cattle odours. Insect Sci Appl 5:335–339Google Scholar
  19. Helle T (1980) Abundance of warble fly (Oedemagena tarandi) larvae in semi-domestic reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) in Finland. Rep Kevo Subarctic Res Stat 16:1–6Google Scholar
  20. Kafka WA (1970) Molekulare Wechselwirkungen bei der Erregung einzelner Riechzellen. Z vergl Physiol 70:105–143Google Scholar
  21. Kelsall JP (1975) Warble fly distribution among some Canadian caribou. Pp 509–517in Luick JR, Lent PC, Klein DR, White RG (eds) Proc 1st Intern Reindeer and Caribou Symp 1972. Fairbanks/AL: Univ of AlaskaGoogle Scholar
  22. KyorKu C, Brightwell R, Dransfield RD (1990) Traps and odour baits for the tsetse fly,Glossina longipennis (Diptera: Glossinidae). Bull Entomol Res 80:405–415Google Scholar
  23. Mettler LE, Gregg TG, Schaffer HE (1988) Population Genetics and Evolution. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs/NJ: Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  24. Mustaparta H, Angst ME, Lanier GN (1980) Receptor discrimination of enantiomers of the aggregation pheromone ipsdienol, in two species ifIps. J Chem Ecol 6:689–701Google Scholar
  25. Nicolas G, Sillans D (1989) Immediate and latent effects of carbon dioxide on insects. Annu Rev Entomol 34:97–116Google Scholar
  26. Nilssen AC, Anderson JR (1995) Flight capacity of the reindeer warble flyHypoderma tarandi (L.) and the reindeer nose bot flyCephenemyia trompe (Modeer) (Diptera: Oestridae). Can J Zool 73:1228–1238Google Scholar
  27. Nilssen AC, Haugerud RE (1994) The timing and exit rate of larvae of the reindeer warble flyHypoderma ( =Oedemagena)tarandi (L.) and the reindeer nose bot flyCephenemyia trompe (Modeer) (Diptera: Oestridae) from the reindeer. Rangifer 14:113–122Google Scholar
  28. Nilssen AC, Haugerud RE (1995) Epizootiology of the reindeer nose bot fly,Cephenemyia trompe (Modeer) (Diptera: Oestridae), in reindeer,Rangifer tarandus (L.), in Norway. Can J Zool 73:1024–1036Google Scholar
  29. Nilssen AC, Tømmerås BÅ, Schmid R, Evensen SB (1996) Dimethyl trisulphide is a strong attractant for some calliphorids and a muscid but not for the reindeer oestrids Hypoderma tarandi and Cephenemyia trompe. Entomol exp appl: in pressGoogle Scholar
  30. Papavero N (1977) The World Oestridae (Diptera), Mammals and Continental Drift. Ser Entomol 14:1–145. NL-The Hague: W. JunkGoogle Scholar
  31. Rognes K (1991) Blowflies (Diptera, Calliphoridae) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Fauna Ent Scand 24:1–272. DK-Klampenborg: Scandinavian Sci PressGoogle Scholar
  32. Saveljiev D (1971) Renstyngens biologi och kampen mot dessa insekter. Pp 84–86in Report from the Reindeer Symposium in Rovaniemi 26–27/5, 1971, SF-Helsingfors: Lantbruksarbetsgruppen inom Kommitten för ventenskaplig-teknisk samverkan mellan Finland och SovjetunionenGoogle Scholar
  33. Schmid R, Evensen SB, Tømmerås BÅ, Nilssen AC (in prep.) Chemical isolation and identification of potent olfactory stimulants for the nose bot flyCephenemyia trompe (Oestridae) from the interdigital pheromone gland of reindeerRangifer tarandus. Google Scholar
  34. Sdobnikov VM (1935) Relations between the reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) and the animal life of tundra and forest. Trans Arctic Inst Leningrad 24:5–66Google Scholar
  35. Tømmerås BÅ, Mustaparta H (1987) Chemoreception of host volatiles in the bark beetleIps typographus. J Comp Physiol A 161:705–710Google Scholar
  36. Tømmerås BÅ, Wibe A, Nilssen A, Anderson JR (1993) The olfactory response of the reindeer nose bot fly,Cephenemyia trompe (Oestridae), to components from interdigital pheromone gland and urine from the host reindeer,Rangifer tarandus. Chemoecology 4:115–119Google Scholar
  37. Vale GA, Hall DR (1985a) The use of 1-octen-3-ol, acetone and carbon dioxide in the attraction of tsetse flies,Glossina spp. (Diptera: Glossinidae), to ox odour. Bull entomol Res 75:209–217Google Scholar
  38. Vale GA, Hall DR (1985b) The use of 1-octen-3-ol, acetone and carbon dioxide to improve baite for tsetse flies,Glossina spp. (Diptera: Glossinidae). Bull entomol Res 75:219–231Google Scholar
  39. Vale GA, Bursell E, Hargrove JW (1985) Catching-out the tsetse fly. Parasitol Today 1:106–110Google Scholar
  40. Warnes ML (1989) Responses of the tsetse fly,Glossina pallidipes, to ox odour, carbon dioxide and a visual stimulus in the laboratory. Entomol exp appl 50:245–253Google Scholar
  41. Wood DM (1987) Oestridae. Pp 1147–1158in McAlpine JF (ed.) Manual of Nearctic Diptera. Vol 2. Ottowa: Research Branch Agriculture CanadaGoogle Scholar
  42. Zumpt F (1957) Some remarks on the classification of the Oestridaes. lat. (Diptera). J Entomol Soc S Afr 20:154–161Google Scholar
  43. Zumpt F (1965) Myiasis in Man and Animals in the Old World. GB-London: Butterworth & Co.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bjørn Å. Tømmerås
    • 1
  • Arne C. Nilssen
    • 2
  • Atle Wibe
    • 3
  1. 1.Norwegian Institute for Nature ResearchTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Department of Zoology, Tromsø MuseumUniversity of TromsøTromsøNorway
  3. 3.Department of ZoologyUniversity of Trondheim—AVHDragvollNorway

Personalised recommendations