Advertisement

Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 211–218 | Cite as

“Wall-papering” and elaborate nest architecture in the ponerine antHarpegnathos saltator

  • C. Peeters
  • B. Hölldobler
  • M. Moffett
  • T. M. Musthak Ali
Research Articles

Summary

Excavation of 18 nests ofHarpegnathos saltator from southern India revealed an unusually complex architecture for a ponerine ant. The inhabited chambers are not deep in the ground. The uppermost chamber is protected by a thick vaulted roof, on the outside of which is an intervening space serving as isolation from the surrounding soil. In large colonies, the vaulted roof is extended into a shell which encloses several superimposed chambers. Little openings, which may be encircled by moulded flanges, occur in the upper region of the shell. The inside of the chambers is partly or completely lined with strips of empty cocoons. A refuse chamber is always found deeper than the inhabited chambers; live dipteran larvae (family Milichiidae) are typically present. These elaborate nests represent a large energetic investment, and we speculate therefore that nest emigration is unlikely in this species. Consequently, colony fission may never occur, unlike other ants where gamergates reproduce.

Key words

nest ant monsoon Ponerinae fission emigration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Braun, U., C. Peeters and B. Hölldobler, 1994. The giant nests of the African Stink AntPaltothyreus tarsatus (Formicidae: Ponerinae).Biotropica, in press.Google Scholar
  2. Hölldobler, B., 1980. Canopy orientation: a new kind of orientation in ants.Science 210:86–88.Google Scholar
  3. Hölldobler, B. and E. O. Wilson, 1986. Ecology and behavior of the primitive cryptobiotic antPrionopelta amabilis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Ins. Soc. 33:45–58.Google Scholar
  4. Hölldobler, B. and E. O. Wilson, 1990.The Ants. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Jessen, K., U. Maschwitz and M. Hahn, 1979. Neue Abdominaldrüsen bei Ameisen I. Ponerini (Formicidae: Ponerinae).Zoomorphologie 94:49–66.Google Scholar
  6. Lévieux, J., 1965. Description de quelques nids de fourmis de Côte d'Ivoire (Hym.).Bull. Ent. Soc. France 70:259–266.Google Scholar
  7. Maschwitz, U., 1981 a. Predatory behavior and its correlation to recruitment behavior, morphology, and nesting habits in three species of ponerine ants. In: F. G. Barth, ed.Neurobiology and strategies of adaptation (Joint symposium, Hebrew University of Jerusalem and J. W. Goethe Universität, Frankfurt) pp. 52–59.Google Scholar
  8. Maschwitz, U., 1981 b. Fliegen als Wegelagerer und Parasiten bei Ameisen. Nachr. ent. Ver. Apollo, Frankfurt, N. F.2:57–60.Google Scholar
  9. Maschwitz, U., M. Hahn and P. Schönegge, 1979. Paralysis of prey in ponerine ants.Naturwissenschaften 66:213–214.Google Scholar
  10. Musthak Ali, T. M., C. Baroni Urbani and J. Billen, 1992. Multiple jumping behaviors in the antHarpegnathos saltator.Naturwissenschaften 79:374–376.Google Scholar
  11. Peeters, C., 1991. The occurrence of sexual reproduction among ant workers.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 44:141–152.Google Scholar
  12. Wheeler, W. M., 1922. Observations onGigantiops destructor and other leaping ants.Biol. Bull. 42:185–201.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Peeters
    • 1
    • 2
  • B. Hölldobler
    • 1
  • M. Moffett
    • 3
  • T. M. Musthak Ali
    • 4
  1. 1.Theodor-Boveri-InstitutLehrstuhl Verhaltensphysiologie und Soziobiologie der UniversitätWürzburgGermany
  2. 2.CNRS URA 667, Laboratoire d'EthologieUniversité Paris NordVilletaneuseFrance
  3. 3.Museum of Comparative ZoologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA
  4. 4.Department of EntomologyUniversity of Agricultural SciencesBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations