Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 10, Issue 5, pp 559–563

Selection may be strongest when resources are scarce: A comment on Wilson

  • Howard D. Rundle
  • Steven M. Vamosi
Comment

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold, S.J. and Wade, M.J. (1984) On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory.Evolution 38, 709–19.Google Scholar
  2. Lande, R. (1979) Quantitative genetical analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry.Evolution 33, 403–16.Google Scholar
  3. Lande, R. and Arnold, S.J. (1983) Measurement of selection of correlated characters.Evolution 37, 1210–26.Google Scholar
  4. Price, G.R. (1970) Selection and covariance.Nature 227, 520–1.Google Scholar
  5. Schluter, D. (1988) Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait.Evolution 42, 849–61.Google Scholar
  6. Statistical Sciences Inc. (1992)S-plus 3.1. Statistical Sciences Inc., Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  7. Wilson, P. (1995) Variation in the intensity of pollination inDrosera tracyi: selection is strongest when resources are intermediate.Evol. Ecol. 9, 382–96.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Howard D. Rundle
    • 1
  • Steven M. Vamosi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations