Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 406–420 | Cite as

Why menopause?

  • Alan R. Rogers


George Williams proposed in 1957 that menopause evolved because, late in life, women have more to gain from child care than from continued fertility. I develop here a quantitative model of this idea in order to determine whether the proposed benefit is in fact larger than the cost. To make this work possible, I introduce an age-structured theory of kin selection that allows for a time delay between an act of altruism and the benefit it provides. Using this theory, I show that in age-structured populations, conventional inclusive fitness calculations are justified for effects on fertility only when either the population is stationary or there is no delay between cost and benefit. For effects on mortality, conventional calculations also require that donor and recipient be affected at the same age. I then introduce two versions of Williams' idea. Model I assumes that menopause is maintained because it reduces the risk of mortality during childbirth, thus increasing the provision of parental care. The analysis demonstrates that this model is incapable of accounting for menopause. Model II assumes that menopause facilitates parental care by reducing the time during which a woman is partially incapacitated by the demands of pregnancy and infant care. This model could not be rejected. However, a definitive test will require parameter estimates that are not yet available.


menopause age-structured theory kin selection fertility 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander, R.D. (1990) How did humans evolve: reflections on the uniquely unique species. Special Publication 1, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  2. Charlesworth, B. (1980)Evolution in Age-structured Populations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  3. Charlesworth, B. and Charnov, E. L. (1981) Kin selection in age-structured populations.J. Theor. Biol. 88, 103–19.Google Scholar
  4. Charnov, E. (1993)Life History Invariants. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  5. Dawkins, R. (1982)The Extended Phenotype: The Gene as the Unit of Selection. Oxford University Press NY, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Fisher, R.A. (1958)The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, 2nd edn. Dover, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  7. Gaulin, S.J.C. (1980) Sexual dimorphism in the human post-reproductive lifespan.J. Human Evol. 9, 227–32.Google Scholar
  8. Hamilton, W.D. (1966) The moulding of senescence by natural selection.J. Theor. Biol. 12, 12–45.Google Scholar
  9. Hamilton, W.D. (1975) Innate social aptitudes in man, an approach from evolutionary genetics. InBiosocial Anthropology (R. Fox ed.), pp. 135–57. Wiley, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Hawkes, K., O'Connell, J.F. and Blurton Jones, N. (1989) Hard-working Hadza grandmothers. InComparative Socioecology: The Behavioural Ecology of Humans and Other Mammals, (V. Standen and R.A. Feley, eds), pp. 341–66. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  11. Hill, K. and Hurtado, M. (1991) The evolution of premature reproductive senescence in human females: an evaluation of the ‘grandmother hypothesis’.Human Nat. 2, 313–50.Google Scholar
  12. Hurtado, M., Hawkes, K. and Kaplan, H. (1985) Female subsistence strategies among Ache huntergatherers of Eastern Paraguay.Human Ecol. 13, 1–28.Google Scholar
  13. Lancaster, J.B. and King, B.J. (1985) An evolutionary perspective on menopause.In Her Prime: A New View of Middle-aged Women (J.K. Brown and V. Kerns eds), pp. 7–15. Bergin and Garvey, South Hadley, MA, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Mayer, P.J. (1982) Evolutionary advantage of the menopause.Human Ecol. 10, 477–94.Google Scholar
  15. Morris, M., Matessi, C. and Karlin, S. (1987) Models of intergenerational kin altruism.Am. Nat. 130, 544–69.Google Scholar
  16. Pavelka, M.S.M. and Fedigan, L.M. (1991) Menopause: a comparative life history perspective.Yearbook Phys. Anthropol. 34, 13–38.Google Scholar
  17. Pennington, R. (1991) Child fostering as a reproductive strategy among southern African pastoralists.Ethol. Sociobiol. 12, 83–104.Google Scholar
  18. Pennington, R. and Harpending, H.C. (1993)The Structure of an African Pastoralist Community: Demography, History and Ecology of the Ngamiland Herero. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, (in press).Google Scholar
  19. Rogers, A.R. (1993) Evolution of time preference by natural selection, (submitted).Google Scholar
  20. Rothman, D.J. and Rothman, S.M. (1987)Maternal Mortality in New York City and Philadeophia, 1931–1933. Garland, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  21. Shapiro, S., Schlesinger, E.R. and Nesbitt Jr, R. E. L. (1968)Infant, Perinatal, Maternal, and Childhood Mortality in the United States. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Stephens, D.W. (1990) Risk and incomplete information in behavioral ecology. InRisk and Uncertainty in Tribal and Peasant Economies. (E.A. Cashdan, ed.), pp. 19–46. Westview Press, San Francisco, USA.Google Scholar
  23. Taylor, P.D. (1990) Allele-frequency change in a class-structured population.Am. Nat. 135, 95–106.Google Scholar
  24. Weiss, K.M. (1981) Evolutionary perspectives on human aging. InOther Ways of Growing Old (P. Amoss and S. Harrell, eds), pp. 25–52. Stanford University Press, Stanford, USA.Google Scholar
  25. Williams, G.C. (1957) Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence.Evolution 11, 398–411.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan R. Rogers
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations