Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 236–241 | Cite as

Hypothesis on adaptive features of the compound eye of bees: Flower-specific specializations

  • A. Dafni
  • P. G. Kevan

Summary

This note surveys the current knowledge of the existence of acute zones in insects' eyes in relation to beeflower interactions.

We suggest some broad generalizations correlating the size, use, structure and presentation of flowers with the foraging behaviour, body size and eye design of bees.

Special emphasis is given to the differences between small and large bees and the architecture of flowers that they use.

Keywords

bees compound eye insect vision flower form 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Appanah, S. (1990) Plant—pollinator interactions in the Malaysian rain forests. InReproductive ecology and tropical rain forest plants (K.S. Bawa and M. Hadley, eds), pp. 85–102. UNESCO, and Parthenon, Paris.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, H.G. (1961) Adaptations of flowering plants to nocturnal and crepuscular pollinators.Q. Rev. Biol. 36, 64–73.Google Scholar
  3. Baumgärtner, H. (1928) Der Formensin und die Sehschärfe der Bienen.Z. vergl. Physiol. 7, 56–143.Google Scholar
  4. Benham, B.R. (1969) Insect visitors toChamaenerion angustifolium and their behaviour in relation to pollination.The Entomologist 102, 221–8.Google Scholar
  5. Burkhardt, D., Darnhofer-Demar, B. and Fischer, K. (1973) Zum binokularen Entfernungssehen der Insekten. I. Die Struktur des Sehraums von Synsekten.J. comp. Physiol. 87, 165–88.Google Scholar
  6. Collett, T.S. and Harkness, L.I.K. (1982) Depth vision in animals. InAnalysis of visual behavior (D.J. Ingle, M.A. Goodale and R.J.W. Mansfield, eds), pp. 116–76. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  7. Corbet, S.A. Cuthill, I., Fallows, M., Harrison, T. and Hartley, G. (1981) Why do nectar-foraging bees and wasps work upwards on inflorescences?Oecologia 51, 79–83.Google Scholar
  8. Dafni, A. (1994) Note on side advertisement in flowers.Funct. Ecol. 8, 136–8.Google Scholar
  9. Dayanandan, S., Attygalla, D.N.C., Abeygunasekara, A.W.W.L., Gunatilleke, I.A.U.N. and Gunatilleke, C.V.S. (1990) Phenology and floral morphology in relation to pollination of some Sri Lankan Diptrocarps. InReproductive ecology of tropical forest plants (K.S. Bawa and M. Hadley, eds), pp. 103–34. UNESCO and Parthenon, Paris.Google Scholar
  10. Dietrich, W. (1909) Die Fecettenaugen der Dipteren.Z. wiss. Zool. 92, 465–539.Google Scholar
  11. Faegri, K. and van der Pijl, L. (1979)The Principles of Pollination Ecology, 3rd edn. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  12. Frankie, W.G. (1975) Tropical forest phenology and plant coevolution. InCoevolution of animals and plants (L.E. Gilbert and P.H. Raven, eds), pp. 192–209. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
  13. Frankie, W.G. and Coville, R. (1979) An experimental study of the foraging behaviour of selected solitary bee species in the Costa Rican dry forest (Hymenoptera, Apoidea).J. Kanas Entomol. Soc. 52, 591–602.Google Scholar
  14. Frankie, W.G. and Haber, W.A. (1983) Why bees move among mass-flowering neotropical trees. InHandbook of Experimental Pollination Biology (C.E. Jones and R.J. Little, eds), pp. 361–72. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Frankie, W.G., Vinson, S.B., Newstorm, L.D., Barthell, J.F., Haber, W.A. and Frankie, J.W. (1990) Plant phenology, pollination ecology, pollinator behavior and conservation of pollinators in neotropical dry forest. InReproductive Ecology and Tropical Rain Forest Plants (K.S. Bawa and M. Hadley, eds), pp. 37–47. UNESCO and Parthenon, Paris.Google Scholar
  16. Frantsevitch, L.I. and Pichka, V.E. (1986) The size of the binocular zone of the visual field in insects.J. Evol. Biochem. and Physiol. (USSR) 16, 461–5 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  17. Hocking, B. (1953) The intrinsic range and speed of flight of insects.Trans. Rev. Entomol. Soc. London 104, 223–345.Google Scholar
  18. Hocking, B. (1968) Insect—flower association in the high Arctic with special reference to nectar.Oikos 19, 359–88.Google Scholar
  19. Horridge, A. (1977) The compound eye of insects.Sci Am 237, 107–20.Google Scholar
  20. Kevan, P.G. (1990). How large bees,Bombus andXylocopa (Apoidea, Hymenoptera) forage on trees: optimality and patterns of movements in temperate and tropical trees.Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 2, 233–42.Google Scholar
  21. Kevan, P.G. and Lack, A.J. (1985) Pollination in a cryptically dioecious plantDecasperum parviflorum (Lam.) A.J. Scott (Myrtaceae) by pollen-collecting bees in Sulawesi, Indonesia.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 25, 319–30.Google Scholar
  22. Lack, A.J. and Kevan, P.J. (1984) On the reproductive biology of a canopy tree,Syzygium syzygioides (Myrtaceae) in Sulawesi, Indonesia.Biotropica 16, 31–6.Google Scholar
  23. Land, M. (1989) Variation in the structure and design of compound eyes. InFacets of vision (R.C. Hardie and D.G. Stavenga, eds), pp. 90–111. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  24. Land, M. (1990) The design of compound eyes. InVision: coding and efficiency (C. Blackmore, ed.), pp. 55–64. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  25. Laverty, T.M. and Plowright, R.C. (1985) Competition between hummingbirds and bumblebees for nectar in flowers ofImpatiens biflora.Oecologia 66 25–329.Google Scholar
  26. Lehrer, M. (1992) Parallel processing of motion, shape and colour in the visual system of the bee. InSensory Systems of Arthropods (K. Wiese, ed.), pp. 266–72. Birkhäusen Verlag, Basel.Google Scholar
  27. Lewis, T. and Taylor, L.R. (1967)Introduction to Experimental Ecology. Academic Press, London and New York.Google Scholar
  28. O'Toole, Ch. and Raw, A. (1991)Bees of the World. Blanford Press, London.Google Scholar
  29. Pritchard, G. (1966) On the morphology of the compound eyes of the dragonflies (Odonata, Anisoptera) with special reference to their role in prey capture.Proc. R. Entomol. Soc. London Ser. A 41 1–8.Google Scholar
  30. Pyke, G.H. (1979) Optimal foraging in bumblebees: rules of movement between flowers within inflorescences.Anim. Behav. 27 1167–81.Google Scholar
  31. Rossel, S. (1979) Regional differences in photoreceptor performance in the eye of the praying mantid.J. comp. Physiol. 131 95–112.Google Scholar
  32. Roubik, D.W. (1989)Ecology and Natural History of Tropical Bees. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  33. Roubik, D.W. (1993) Tropical pollinators in the canopy and understory: field data and theory of stratum ‘preferences’.J. Insect Behav. 6 659–73.Google Scholar
  34. Seidl, R. and Kaiser, W. (1982) Visual field size, binocular domain and ommatidial array of the compound eye in worker honeybees.J. comp. Physiol. A. 143 17–26.Google Scholar
  35. Srinivasan, M.V., Lehrer, M., Kircher, W.H. and Zhang, S.W. (1991) Range perception through apparent image speed in freely flying bees.Vis. Neurosci. 6 519–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. van Praagh, J.P., Ribi, W., Wehrahahn, C. and Wittman, D. (1980). Drone bees fixate the queen with the dorsal frontal part of their compound eyes.J. comp. Physiol. 136 263–6.Google Scholar
  37. Wehner, R. (1972) Pattern modulation and pattern detection in the visual system of Hymenoptera. InInformation Processing in the Visual System of Arthropods (R. Wehner, ed.), pp. 183–94. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  38. Wehner, R. (1981) Spatial vision in arthropods. InComparative physiology and Evolution of Vision in Invertebrates. C. Invertebrates visual centers and behaviour (H. Autrum, ed.), pp. 287–616. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  39. Zeil, J. (1983). Sexual dimorphism in the visual systems of flies; the free flight behavior of maleBibionidae (Diptera).J comp. Physiol. 150 395–412.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Dafni
    • 1
  • P. G. Kevan
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of EvolutionHaifa UniversityHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Environmental BiologyUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations