Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 354–368 | Cite as

The scheduling of molt in migratory birds

  • Noél Holmgren
  • Anders Hedenström
Article

Summary

We model the yearly cycle of small migratory birds to explain the variation in scheduling of complete molt, in particular why some birds molt immediately after breeding on the breeding grounds (summer molt) whereas others migrate to their wintering grounds before molt is initiated (winter molt). We employ the method of dynamic programming, because of its suitability for modelling life history traits. Feather quality and latitude entered the model as state variables and were assumed to affect survival rate and reproductive success. Migration and molt were assumed to be associated with increased mortality risks. By changing the parameters in the model we were able to generate most existing molt patterns, including summer and winter molt, biannual (summer and winter) molt, and molt migration. Our model suggests that the scheduling of molt is basically a result of a trade-off between having a high feather quality during breeding versus during the non-breeding period. A high impact of feather quality on survival rate in combination with low costs of molt resulted in biannual molt. Winter molt became more likely as the survival rateper se increased. A low seasonal amplitude in survival rate is a prerequisite for the occurrence of molt migration. Molt duration, migration costs and reproductive successper se were found to have no impact on the timing of molt. We also investigated the effect of benefits from prior occupancy at breeding and winter grounds.

Keywords

molt pattern dynamic programming feather quality seasonality survival rate reproductive success 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alerstam, T. (1990)Bird Migration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  2. Alerstam, T. and Högstedt, G. (1982) Bird migration and reproduction in relation to habitats for survival and breeding.Ornis Scand. 13, 25–37.Google Scholar
  3. Berthold, P. and Querner, U. (1982) Genetic basis of moult, wing length, and body weight in a migratory bird species,Sylvia atricapilla.Experientia 38, 801–2.Google Scholar
  4. Blomqvist, S. and Elander, M. (1981) Sabine's gull (Xema sabini), Ross's gull (Rhodostethia rosea) and ivory gull (Pagophila eburnea) — gulls in the Arctic: a review.Arctic 34, 122–32 and 388.Google Scholar
  5. Dolnik, V.R. and Gavrilov, V.M. (1979) Bioenergetics of molt in the chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs).Auk 96, 253–64.Google Scholar
  6. Emlen, S.T. (1975) Migration: orientation and navigation. InAvian Biology, Vol. 5 (D.S. Farner and J.R. King, eds) pp. 129–219. Academic Press, New York USA.Google Scholar
  7. Fretwell, S.D. (1985) Why do birds migrate? Inter and intraspecific competition in the evolution of bird migration, contributions from population ecology.Acta Congr. Int. Ornithol. 18, 630–7.Google Scholar
  8. Gauthreaux S.A. Jr. (1982) The ecology and evolution of avian migration systems. InAvian biology, Vol. 6 (D.S. Farner, J.R. King and K.C. Parkes, eds) pp. 93–168. Academic Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Ginn, H.B. and Melville, D.S. (1983)Moult in Birds. Guide 19, BTO, Tring, UK.Google Scholar
  10. Glutz von Blotzheim, U.N. and Bauer, K.M. (1991)Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas. Band 12/II. Passeriformes (3. Teil). Aula—Verlag, Wiesbaden, Germany.Google Scholar
  11. Hamilton, W.D. and Zuk, M. (1982) Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites?Science 218, 384–7.Google Scholar
  12. Hasselquist, D., Hedenström, A., Lindström, Å. and Bensch, S. (1988) The seasonally divided flight feather moult in the barred warblerSylvia nisoria — a new moult pattern for European passerines.Ornis Scand. 19, 280–6.Google Scholar
  13. Haukioja, E. (1971) Flightlessness in some moulting passerines in Northern Europe.Ornis Fenn. 48, 101–16.Google Scholar
  14. Hedenström, A., Bensch, S., Hasselquist, D., Lockwood, M. and Ottosson, U. (1993) Migration, stopover and moult of the great reed warblerAcrocephalus arundinaceus in Ghana, West Africa.Ibis 135, 177–80.Google Scholar
  15. Hedenström, A. and Møller, A. P. (1992) Morphological adaptations to song flight in passerine birds: a comparative study.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B247, 183–7.Google Scholar
  16. Hedenström, A. and Pettersson, J. (1987) Migration routes and wintering areas of willow warblersPhylloscopus trochilus (L.) ringed in Fennoscandia.Ornis Fenn. 64, 137–43.Google Scholar
  17. Houston, A., Clark, C., McNamara, J. and Mangel, M. (1988) Dynamic models in behavioural and evolutionary ecology.Nature 332, 29–34.Google Scholar
  18. Hussell, D.J.T. (1972) Factors affecting clutch size in arctic passerines.Ecol. Monogr. 42, 317–64.Google Scholar
  19. Jehl, J.R., Jr. and Murray, B.G., Jr. (1986) The evolution of normal and reversed sexual size dimorphism in shorebirds and other birds.Curr. Ornithol. 3, 1–86.Google Scholar
  20. Jenni, L. and Winkler, R. (1994)Moult and Ageing of European Passerines. Academic Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
  21. Jönsson, P.E. and Alerstam, T. (1990) The adaptive significance of parental role division and sexual size dimorphism in breeding shorebirds.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 41, 301–14.Google Scholar
  22. Kendeigh, S.C. (1949) Effect of temperature and season on the energy resources of the English sparrow.Auk 66, 113–27.Google Scholar
  23. Ketterson, E.D. and Nolan, V., Jr. (1976) Geographic variation and its climatic correlates in the sex ratio of eastern-wintering dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis).Ecology 57, 679–93.Google Scholar
  24. King, J.R. (1981) Energetics of avian moult.Acta Congr. Int. Ornithol. 17, 312–317.Google Scholar
  25. Lack, D. (1968)Ecological Adaptations for Breeding in Birds. Methuen, London, UK.Google Scholar
  26. Lindström, Å., Visser, G.H. and Daan, S. (1993a) The energetic cost of feather synthesis is proportional to basal metabolic rate.Physiol. Zool. 64, 490–510.Google Scholar
  27. Lindström, Å., Pearson, D.J., Hasselquist, D., Hedenström, A., Bensch, S. and Åkesson, S. (1993b) The moult of barred warblersSylvia nisoria in Kenya — evidence for a split wing-moult pattern initiated during the birds' first winter.Ibis 135, 403–9.Google Scholar
  28. Ludwig, D. and Levin, S.A. (1991) Evolutionary stability of plant communities and the maintenance of multiple dispersal types.Theor. Pop. Biol. 40, 285–307.Google Scholar
  29. Lundberg, S. and Alerstam, T. (1986) Bird migration patterns: conditions for stable geographical population segregation.J. Theor. Biol. 123, 403–14.Google Scholar
  30. Mangel, M. and Clark, C.W. (1988)Dynamic Modelling in Behavioral Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.Google Scholar
  31. Maynard Smith, J. (1982)Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  32. Maynard Smith, J. and Price, G.R. (1973) The logic of animal conflict.Nature 246, 15–18.Google Scholar
  33. Murphy, M.E. and King, J.R. (1990) Diurnal changes in tissue glutathione and protein pools of molting white-crowned sparrows: the influence of photoperiod and feeding schedules.Physiol. Zool. 63, 1118–40.Google Scholar
  34. Murphy, M.E. and King, J.R. (1991) Nutritional aspects of avian moult.Acta Congr. Int. Ornithol. 20, 2186–93.Google Scholar
  35. Myers, J.P. (1981a) Cross-seasonal interactions in the evolution of sandpiper social systems.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 8, 195–202.Google Scholar
  36. Myers, J.P. (1981b) A test of three hypotheses for latitudinal segregation of the sexes in wintering birds.Can. J. Zool. 59, 1527–34.Google Scholar
  37. Noordhuis, R. (1989) Patronen in slagpenrui: oecofysiologische aanpassingen.Limosa 62, 35–45 (in Dutch with English summary).Google Scholar
  38. Norberg, U.M. (1990)Vertebrate Flight. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  39. Payne, R.B. (1972) Mechanisms and control of moult. InAvian Biology, Vol. 2 (D.S. Farner and J.R. King, eds) pp. 103–55. Academic Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  40. Pearson, D.J. (1973) Moult of some Palaearctic warblers wintering in Uganda.Bird Study 20, 24–36.Google Scholar
  41. Pennycuick, C.J. (1975) Mechanics of flight. InAvian Biology, Vol. 5 (D.S. Farner and J.R. King, eds) pp. 1–75. Academic Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  42. Pennycuick, C.J. (1989)Bird Flight Performance: a Practical Calculation Manual. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  43. Prys-Jones, R. (1991) The occurrence of biannual primary moult in passerines.Bull. Br. Ornithol. Club 111, 150–2.Google Scholar
  44. Rayner, J.M.V. (1986) Vertebrate flapping flight mechanics and aerodynamics, and the evolution of flight in bats. InBiona report, Vol. 5 (W. Nachtigall, ed.) pp. 27–75. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
  45. Ricklefs, R.E. (1980) Geographical variation in clutch size among passerine birds: Ashmole's hypothesis.Auk 97, 38–49.Google Scholar
  46. Salomonsen, F. (1968) The moult migration.Wildfowl 19, 5–24.Google Scholar
  47. Stresemann, E. and Stresemann, V. (1966) Die Mauser der Vögel.J. Orn. Sonderheft.Google Scholar
  48. Stresemann, E. (1963) Zeitraum und Verlauf der Handschwingen—Mauser palaearktischer Möwen, Seeschwalben und Limicolen.J. Orn. 104, 424–235.Google Scholar
  49. Svensson, L. (1992)Identification Guide for European Passerines. 4th ed. Lars Svensson, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  50. Underhill, L.G., Prys-Jones, R.P., Dowsett, R. J., Herroelen, P., Johnson, D.N., Lawn, M.R., Norman, S.C., Pearson, D.J. and Tree, A.J. (1992) The biannual primary moult of willow warblersPhylloscopus trochilus in Europe and Africa.Ibis 134, 286–97.Google Scholar
  51. von Haartman, L., (1968) The evolution of resident versus migratory habit in birds. Some considerations.Ornis Fenn. 45, 1–7.Google Scholar
  52. Williamson, K. (1968)Identification for Ringers. The Genera Cettia, Locustella, Acrocephalus and Hippolais. BTO, Tring, UK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Noél Holmgren
    • 1
  • Anders Hedenström
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Theoretical EcologyLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations