The Journal of Value Inquiry

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 431–446 | Cite as

The camera never lies: Social construction of self and group in video, film, and photography

  • Jo Ann Oravec


Social Construction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Austin, John (1963).How to Do Things With Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barrett, Terry (1990).Criticizing Photographs. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  3. Bazin, André (1971).What Is Cinema?, Vol. 2. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bounds, Wendy (1994). “An Easy Way to Get an Ex Out of the Picture—And No Lawyer!,Wall Street Journal, 16 June 1994, p. B1.Google Scholar
  5. Brand, Stewart (1987).The Media Lab: Inventing the Future at MIT. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  6. Clanchy, M. T. (1979).From Memory to Written Record in England. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  7. Costa, Arthur and Bena Kallick (1993). “Through the Lens of a Critical Friend,”Educational Leadership, 51.2: 49–51.Google Scholar
  8. Cox, Elizabeth and Leslie Lothstein (1989). “Video Self-Portraits,”International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 39.2: 241–253.Google Scholar
  9. Dartley, Jon (1993). “Lost Horizons? Tortious and Philosophical Implications of Computer Imaging,”Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, 19.1: 199–221.Google Scholar
  10. Didion, Joan (1976). “Why I Write,”New York Times, syndicated commentary.Google Scholar
  11. Egido, Carmen (1988). “Video Conferencing as a Technology to Support Group Work,”Proceedings of the Second Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Group Work. New York: ACM Press, pp. 13–24.Google Scholar
  12. Eisenstein, Elizabeth (1979).The Printing Press as an Agent of Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fryrear, Jerry and Baray Stephens (1988). “Group Psychotherapy Using Masks and Video to Facilitate Intrapersonal Communication,”Arts-In-Psychotherapy, 15.3: 227–234.Google Scholar
  14. Guilshan, Christine (1992). “A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Lies?: Electronic Imaging and the Future of the Admissability of Photographs into Evidence,”Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, 18, pp. 365–380.Google Scholar
  15. Harbaugh, Shawn (1989). “Legal Video Teleconferencing: Cutting Edge Technology for Dispositions... and More,”Trial, No. 25 (April), pp. 84–86.Google Scholar
  16. Harrison, Steve, Scott Minneman, Bob Stults and Kay Weber (1990). “Video: A Design Medium,”SIGCHI Bulletin, 21.3: 86–90.Google Scholar
  17. Hochswender, Wendy (1992). “When Seeing Cannot Be Believing,”New York Times, 23 June, pp. B1, B3.Google Scholar
  18. Horton, Mark, Mary Elwart-Keys and Ruth Kass (1989). “Video as an Enabling Technology for Computer-Supported Cooperative Work,”SIGCHI Bulletin, 21.2: 96–99.Google Scholar
  19. Kelly, Kevin (1985). “Digital Retouching: The End of Photography as Evidence of Anything,”Whole Earth Review, 47 (July), pp. 42–50.Google Scholar
  20. Mead, George (1934).Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Metz, Christian (1974).Language and Cinema. The Hague Paris: Moulton.Google Scholar
  22. Mitchell, William (1994). “When Is Seeing Believing?”Scientific American, 270.2: 68–73.Google Scholar
  23. Nye, David (1985).Image Worlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Oravec, Jo Ann (1993). “Secret Sharers: Consensual and Participatory Surveillance in the Context of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work Systems,”SIGOIS Bulletin, 14.1: 32–40.Google Scholar
  25. Oravec, Jo Ann (1996).Virtual Individuals, Virtual Groups: Human Dimensions of Groupware and Computer Networking. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Petitti, Gerald (1989). “Video as an Externalizing Object in Drama Therapy,”Arts in Psychotherapy, 16.2: 121–125.Google Scholar
  27. Reaves, Sheila (1991). “Digital Alteration of Photographs in Consumer Magazines,”Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 6.3: 175–181.Google Scholar
  28. Ritchlin, Fred (1990).In Our Own Image. New York: Aperture Press.Google Scholar
  29. Searle, John (1969).Speech Acts. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Skafte, Diane (1987). “Video in Groups: Implications for a Social Theory of the Self,”International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 37.3: 389–402.Google Scholar
  31. Solomon-Godeau, Abigail (1984). “Who Is Speaking Thus? Some Questions About Documentary Photography.” In L. Falk and B. Fischer (eds.),The Event Horizon. Toronto: Coach House Press, pp. 193–214.Google Scholar
  32. Vansina, Jan (1965).Oral Tradition. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  33. Whistler, James (1927).The Gentle Art of Making Enemies. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
  34. Whittock, Trevor (1990).Metaphor and Film. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Williams, Daryl (1987). “Use of Video Recordings and Video Links by Courts and Tribunals,”University of Western Australia Law Review, 17: 257–271.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jo Ann Oravec
    • 1
  1. 1.Baruch College, School of Public AffairsCity University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations