Advertisement

Archives of Toxicology

, Volume 60, Issue 4, pp 304–310 | Cite as

Evaluation of paraquat concentrations in paraquat poisoning

  • Jun Ikebuchi
Original Investigations

Abstract

The toxicological significance of paraquat concentrations in paraquat poisonings was evaluated by means of multivariate analysis methods. Paraquat could be determined by a newly developed procedure, which involved thin-layer chromatography with flame ionization detector (TLC-FID) and solid-phase extraction with a disposable octadecylsilane cartridge. This new method proved to be simple, rapid and reliable for the analysis of paraquat in our seven cases of suicidal poisoning. The relationship between plasma paraquat concentration (C) and time from ingestion (T) could be best described by the following functions. The regression equation of fatal cases was ln[ln(Cx1000)]=2.5453-0.2114 lnT. The regression equation of survivors was ln[ln(Cx1000)] =2.1041-0.2826 lnT. The discriminant function (D) to separate the fatal and survival cases was D= 1.3114-0.1617 lnT−0.5408 [In(Cx1000)] (fatal cases: D<0, survivors: D>0). The discriminant function was demonstrated to have a high reliability for the toxicological significance in our seven poisoned patients. The significant correlation between plasma paraquat concentration and urine paraquat concentration (C) in our cases was obtained. The regression equation was lnC=0.953 lnC+1.409. This also indicated that urinary concentrations are 3.3–4.5 times greater than plasma concentrations. The multiple regression equation among plasma paraquat concentration, time from ingestion, and the ingested volume (V) of Gramoxone® (trade name of paraquat), was lnC=0.009V−0.232T+3.612.

It is suggested that the determination of paraquat is of great value, and that these data are useful in assessing the severity and predicting the outcome of poisoning for forensic and clinical purposes.

Key words

Paraquat Intoxication TLC-FID Pharmacokinetics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abou-Donia MB, Komeil AA (1978) Sequential thin-layer chromatography of paraquat and related compounds. J Chromatogr 152: 585–588Google Scholar
  2. Ackman RG (1981) Flame ionization detector applied to thin-layer chromatography on coated quartz rods. Methods Enzymol 72: 205–252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Berry DJ, Grove J (1971) The determination of paraquat (1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridylium cation) in urine. Clin Chim Acta 34: 5–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bismuth C, Garnier R, Dally S, Fournier PE (1982) Prognosis and treatment of paraquat poisoning: A review of 28 cases. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 19: 461–474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonini M, Saux MC, Larcebau S (1973) Dosage du paraquat dans les milieux biologiques. Eur Toxicol 4–5: 237–239Google Scholar
  6. Bus JS, Aust SD, Gibson JE (1974) Superoxide- and singlet oxygen-catalyzed lipid peroxidation as a possible mechanism for paraquat toxicity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 58: 749–755PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bus JS, Aust SD, Gibson JE (1975) Lipid peroxidation: A possible mechanism for paraquat toxicity. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol 11: 31–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Calderbank A, Yuen SH (1965) An ion-exchange method for determining paraquat residues in food crops. Analyst 90: 99–106Google Scholar
  9. de Zeeuw RA, van der Laan PEW, Greving JE, van Mansvelt FJW (1976) Analysis of quaternary ammonium compounds by ion-pair thin layer chromatography. Anal Lett 9: 831–838Google Scholar
  10. Draffan GH, Clare RA, Davies DL, Hawksworth G, Murray S, Davies DS (1977) Quantitative determination of the herbicide paraquat in human plasma by gas chromatographic and mass spectrometric methods. J Chromatogr 139: 311–320PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fatori D, Hunter WM (1980) Radioimmunoassay for serum paraquat. Clin Chim Acta 100: 81–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Franke G, Pietrulla W, Preußner K (1979) Quantitative determination of paraquat in urine and serum by differential pulse polarography. Z Anal Chem 298: 38–42Google Scholar
  13. Frelon JH, Merigot P, Garnier R, Bismuth C, Efthymiou ML (1983) Prognostic factors of acute paraquat poisoning. Retrospective study of the cases collected in 1981 at the Poison Control Center of Paris. Toxicol Eur Res 5: 163–169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gill R, Qua SC, Moffat AC (1983) High-performance liquid chromatography of paraquat and diquat in urine with rapid sample preparation involving ion-pair extraction on disposable cartridges of octadecyl-silica. J Chromatogr 255: 483–490PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Grone HD, Smith EM (1973) A rapid method of thin-layer chromatography to aid the identification of quaternary nitrogen drugs. J Chromatogr 77: 234–236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Haley TJ (1979) Review of the toxicology of paraquat. Clin Toxicol 14: 1–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Harsanyi L, Nemeth A, Lang A (1985) Group intoxication with Gramoxone (Paraquat): Toxicological and pathohistological aspects. Arch Toxicol Suppl 8: 284Google Scholar
  18. Irabu N (1984) Paraquat poisoning in Japan. J Jpn Municipal Hosp Assoc 198: 76–89Google Scholar
  19. Itoh T, Tanaka M, Kaneko H (1980) Flame ionization detection system for thin layer chromatography of lipids. In: Touchstone JC (ed) Thin layer chromatography: Quantitative environmental and clinical applications. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, pp 536–552Google Scholar
  20. Jarvie DR, Stewart MJ (1979) The rapid extraction of paraquat from plasma using an ion-pairing technique. Clin Chim Acta 94: 241–251PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kawano Y, Audino J, Edlund M (1975) Analysis of paraquat formulations by liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 115: 289–292Google Scholar
  22. Knepil J (1977) A short, simple method for the determination of paraquat in plasma. Clin Chim Acta 79: 387–390PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Levitt T (1977) Radioimmunoassay for paraquat. Lancet II: 358Google Scholar
  24. Levitt T (1979) Determination of paraquat in clinical practice using radioimmunoassay. Proc Anal Div Chem Soc 16: 72–76Google Scholar
  25. Miller JJ, Sanders E, Webb D (1979) Measurement of paraquat in serum by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Anal Toxicol 3: 1–3Google Scholar
  26. Mofenson HC, Greensher J, Caraccio TR, Dagostino R (1982–1983) Paraquat intoxication: Report of a fatal case. Discussion of pathophysiology and rational treatment. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 19: 821–834Google Scholar
  27. Morita Y (1974) Shin-tokei-gairon, 3rd edition. Nippon Hyoron Sha, Tokyo, pp 56–97Google Scholar
  28. National Research Institute of Police Science (1968–1986) Circumstances of drug and toxic chemical poisoning in Japan (in Japanese, translated by the author). National Research Institute of Police Science, Tokyo, vol 10–28Google Scholar
  29. Needham L, Paschal D, Rollen ZJ, Liddle J, Bayse D (1979) Determination of paraquat in marijuana by reversed-phase paired-ion high performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr Sci 17: 87–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Niwaguchi T (1982) Drugs and toxic substances in recent forensic chemistry. Eisei Kagaku 28: 184–194Google Scholar
  31. Okonek S, Hofmann A, Henningsen B (1976) Efficacy of gut lavage, hemodialysis, and hemoperfusion in the therapy of paraquat or diquat intoxication. Arch Toxicol 36: 43–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Okonek S, Weilemann LS, Majdandzic J, Setyadharma H, Reinecke HJ (1982–1983) Successful treatment of paraquat poisoning: Activated charcoal per os and continuous hemoperfusion. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 19: 807–819Google Scholar
  33. Okumura T (1980) Sintered thin-layer chromatography. J Chromatogr 184: 37–78Google Scholar
  34. Paschal DC, Needham LL, Rollen ZJ, Liddle JA (1979) Determination of paraquat in sunflower seeds by reversed-phase highperformance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 177: 85–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Proudfoot AT, Stewart MS, Levitt T, Widdop B (1979) Paraquat poisoning: Significance of plasma-paraquat concentrations. Lancet II: 330–332Google Scholar
  36. Pryde A, Darby FJ (1975) The analysis of paraquat in urine by high-speed liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 115: 107–116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Queree EA, Dickson SJ, Shaw SM (1985) Extraction and quantification of paraquat in liver and hemolyzed blood. J Anal Toxicol 9: 10–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Scherrman JM, Galliot M, Garnier R, Bismuth C (1983) Intoxication aigue par le paraquat: intérêt pronostique et thérapeutique du dosage sanguin. Toxicol Eur Res 5: 141–145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Stewart MJ, Levitt T, Jarvie DR (1979) Emergency estimations of paraquat in plasma. A comparison of the RIA and ion pair colorimetric methods. Clin Chim Acta 94: 253–257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Tadjer GS (1967) The identification of paraquat in biological material using thin-layer chromatography. J Forensic Sci 12: 549–553Google Scholar
  41. Teare RD (1976) Poisoning by paraquat. Med Sci Law 16: 9–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. The 75th AOCS Annual Meeting (1985) The symposium on analyses by Iatroscan TLC/FID system. Lipid 20: 501–560Google Scholar
  43. Tompsett SL (1970) Paraquat poisoning. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 28: 346–358Google Scholar
  44. Toyokawa H, Yanai H (1982) Statistics, 1st edition. Gendai-sugakusha, Kyoto, pp 48–86Google Scholar
  45. Tsunenari S (1975) The determination of paraquat using thin-layer chromatography. Forensic Sci 5: 61–67PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Ukai S, Hirose K, Kawase S (1973) Determination of diquat and paraquat in aqueous herbicide preparations by gas chromatography. J Hyg Chem 19: 281–286Google Scholar
  47. Ukai S, Hirose K, Kawase S (1977) Gas chromatography of reduction-products of herbicide diquat and paraquat with sodium borohydride-transition metal salt. J Hyg Chem 23: 32–38Google Scholar
  48. Ukai S, Kawase S (1985) Paraquat poisoning and forensic chemistry. Eisei Kagaku 31: 283–297Google Scholar
  49. van den Bogaerde J, Schelstraete J, Colardyn F, Heyndrickx A (1984) Paraquat poisoning. Forensic Sci Int 26: 103–114PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. van den Heede M, Heyndrickx A, Timperman J (1979) A fatal intoxication due to paraquat intake without any specific treatment. J Pharm Belg 34: 69–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. van den Heede M, Heyndrickx A, Timperman J (1982) Thin layer chromatography as a routine appropriate technique for the determination of bipyridylium herbicides in post mortem human tissues. Med Sci Law 22: 57–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. van Dijk A, Maes RAA, Drost RH, Douze JMC, van Heyst ANP (1975) Paraquat poisoning in man. Arch Toxicol 34: 129–136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. van Dijk A, Ebberink R, de Groot G, Maes RAA, Douze JMC, van Heyst ANP (1977) A rapid and sensitive assay for the determination of paraquat in plasma by gas-liquid chromatography. J Anal Toxicol 1: 151–154Google Scholar
  54. Watari M, Kishi M (1984) Multivariate analysis program, revised edition. Kogaku Tosho Inc., Tokyo, pp 23–66Google Scholar
  55. Yanai H, Takane Y (1985) Multivariate analysis, revised edition. Asakura company, Tokyo, pp 66–85Google Scholar
  56. Yuen SH, Bagness JE, Myles D (1967) Spectrophotometric determination of diquat and paraquat in aqueous herbicide formulations. Analyst 92: 375–381PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jun Ikebuchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Legal MedicineTottori University School of MedicineYonagoJapan

Personalised recommendations