Ocular artifacts in recording EEGs and event-related potentials II: Source dipoles and source components
- 440 Downloads
The source dipoles for blinks point radially whereas the source dipoles for saccades point tangentially, in the direction of the eye movement. This indicates that blink potentials are not generated by eye movements but by the eyelid sliding down over the positively charged cornea. Dipole source dipole analysis shows that the “rider artifact” at the onset of upward and lateral saccades is caused by the eyelid as it lags a little behind the eyes at the beginning of the movement. Dipole source analysis allows both the EEG and the EOG to be modeled simultaneously and EOG generators to be distinguished from nearby EEG generators. Ocular source components can be calculated from a principal component analysis of EEG and EOG recordings during blinks and saccades. The effectiveness of propagation factors, source dipoles and source components in removing ocular artifacts from EEG samples was assessed. The most effective correction procedure uses source components.
Key wordsElectro-oculogram EOG EEG artifacts Source analysis Principal component analysis
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Barlow, J.S. and Rémond, A. Eye movement artifact nulling in EEGs by multichannel on-line EOG subtraction. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1981: 418–423.Google Scholar
- Brunia, C.H.M., Mocks, J., van den Berg-Lenssen, M.M.C. et al. Correcting ocular artifacts in the EEG: A comparison of several methods. J. Psychophysiol., 1989, 3: 1–50.Google Scholar
- Hector, M.L. EEG recording. Butterworths, London, 1976.Google Scholar
- Jervis, B.W., Nichols, M.J., Allen, E.M., Hudson, N.R. and Johnson, T.E. The assessment of two methods for removing eye movement artifact from the EEG. Electroncephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1985, 61: 444–452.Google Scholar
- Möcks, J. and Verlenger R. Multivariate methods in biosignal analysis: application of principal component analysis to event-related potentials. In: R. Weitkunat (Ed.), Digital Biosignal Processing. Techniques in the Behavioral and Neural Sciences. Vol 5. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1991: 399–458.Google Scholar
- Nunez, P.L. and Katznelson, R.D. Electric fields of the brain: the neurophysics of EEG Oxford, New York, 1980.Google Scholar
- Scherg, M. Fundamentals of dipole source analysis. In: M. Hoke, F. Grandori and G.L. Romani (Eds.), Advances in Audiology, Vol 6. Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Potentials. Basel, Karger, 1990: 40–69.Google Scholar
- Scherg, M. and Von Cramon, D. Dipole source potentials of the auditory cortex in normal subjects and patients with temporal lobe lesions. In: F. Grandori, M. Hoke and G.L. Romani (Eds.), Advances in Audiology, Vol 6. Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Potentials. Basel, Karger, 1990: 165–193.Google Scholar
- Scherg, M. and Picton, T.W. Separation and identification of event-related potential components by brain electric source analysis. In: C.H.M. Brunia, G. Mulder and M.N. Verbaten (Eds.), Event-Related Potentials of the Brain. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., Suppl. 42, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991: 24–37.Google Scholar
- Semlitsch, H.V., Anderer, P., Schuster, P. and Presslich, O. A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology, 1986, 23: 965–703.Google Scholar