On unipotent blocks and their ordinary characters

[AB] Alperin, J., Broué, M.: Local methods in block theory. Ann. Math.110, 143–157 (1979)Google Scholar

[BT] Borel, A., Tits, J.: Groupes Réductifs. Publ. Math., Inst. Hautes Étud Sci.27, 55–151 (1965)Google Scholar

[B] Brauer, R.: On blocks and sections in finite groups. I. Am. J. Math.89, 1115–1136 (1967)Google Scholar

[Br] Broué, M.: Les ℓ des groupes GL (n, q) etU(n, q ²) et leurs structures locales. Astérisque133–134, 159–188 (1986)Google Scholar

[BM] Broué, M., Malle, G.: Théorèmes de Sylow génériques pour les groupes réductifs sur les corps finis. Math. Ann.292, 241–262 (1992)Google Scholar

[BMi] Broué, M., Michel, J.: Blocs et séries de Lusztig dans un groupe réductif fini. J. reine angew. Math.395, 56–67 (1989)Google Scholar

[BMM] Broué, M., Malle, G., Michel, J.: Generic blocks of finite reductive groups. Astérisque (to appear)Google Scholar

[C] Cabanes, M.: Local structure of thep-blocks of\(\tilde S_n \). Math. Z.198, 519–543 (1988)Google Scholar

[CE] Cabanes, M., Enguehard, M.: Unipotent blocks of finite reductive groups of a given type. Math. Z.213, 479–490 (1993)Google Scholar

[Ca1] Carter, R. W.: Conjugacy classes in the Weyl group. Compositio Math.25, 1–59 (1972)Google Scholar

[Ca2] Carter, R. W.: Finite Groups of Lie type: Conjugacy classes and Complex Characters. New York, Wiley, 1985Google Scholar

[DM1] Digne, F., Michel, J.: Théorie de Deligne-Lusztig et caractères des groupes linéaires et unitaires. J. of Algebra107, 217–255 (1987)Google Scholar

[DM2] Digne, F., Michel, J.: Representations of finite groups of Lie type. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991Google Scholar

[DM3] Digne, F., Michel, J.: Groupes Réductifs Non Connexes. Rapp. Rech LMENS92-2, 1992Google Scholar

[FS1] Fong, P., Srinivasan, B.: The blocks of finite general and unitary groups. Invent. Math.69, 109–153 (1982)Google Scholar

[FS2] Fong, P. Srinivasan, B.: Generalized Harish-Chandra Theory for Unipotent Characters of Finite Classical Groups. J. of Algebra104, 301–309 (1986Google Scholar

[FS3] Fong, P., Srinivasan, B.: The blocks of finite classical groups. J. reine angew. Math.396, 122–191 (1989)Google Scholar

[GH] Geck, M., Hiss, G.: Basic sets of Brauer characters of finite groups of Lie type. J. reine angew. Math.418, 173–188 (1991)Google Scholar

[H] Hiss, G.: Zerlegungszahlen endlicher Gruppen vom Lie-Typ in nicht-definie render Charakteristik. Thesis 1990Google Scholar

[L] Lusztig, G.: On the representations of reductive groups with disconnected centre. Astérisque168, 157–166 (1988)Google Scholar

[LS] Lusztig, G., Srinivasan, B.: The characters of the finite unitary groups. J. of Algebra49, 167–171 (1977)Google Scholar

[NT] Nagao, H., Tsushima, Y.: Representations of Finite Groups. New York: Academic, 1989Google Scholar

[P1] Puig, Ll.: The Nakayama conjectures and the Brauer pairs. Pub. Math Univ. Paris VII,25, (1987)Google Scholar

[P2] Puig, Ll.: Algèbres de source de certains blocs des groupes de Chevalley. Astérisque181–182, 221–236 (1990)Google Scholar

[S] Schewe, K.: Blöcke exzeptioneller Chevalley-Gruppen. Bonn. Math. Schr.165, (1985)Google Scholar

[SSt] Springer, T., Steinberg, R.: Conjugacy classes. In: Borel A. et al., (eds.) Seminar on algebraic groups and related finite groups. Lect. Notes Math. vol. 131, Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer (1970)Google Scholar

[St] Steinberg, R.: Endomorphisms of linear algebraic groups. Mem.80, (1968)Google Scholar