Journal of Economics

, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 337–352 | Cite as

The liberatarian resolution of the Paretian liberal paradox

  • Alon Harel
  • Shmuel Nitzan


Economic Theory International Economic Liberal Paradox 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barry, B. (1986): “Lady Chatterley's Lover and Doctor Fischer's Bomb Party: Liberalism, Pareto Optimality, and the Problems of Objectionable Preferences.” InFoundations of Social Choice Theory, edited by J. Elser and A. Hylland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bernholz, P. (1980): “A General Social Choice Dilemma: Profitable Exchange and Intransitive Group Preferences.”Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 40: 1–23.Google Scholar
  3. — (1986): “A General Constitutional Possibility Theorem.”Public Choice 51: 241–265.Google Scholar
  4. Blau, J. H. (1975): “Liberal Values and Independence.”Review of Economic Studies 42: 395–402.Google Scholar
  5. Breyer, F. (1977): “The Liberal Paradox, Decisiveness over Issues, and Domain Restrictions.”Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 37: 45–60.Google Scholar
  6. Breyer, F., and Gardner, R. (1980): “Liberal Paradox Game Equilibrium and Gibbard Optimum.”Public Choice 35: 469–481.Google Scholar
  7. Buchanan, J. (1976): “An Ambiguity in Sen's Alleged Proof of the Impossibility of the Paretian Liberal.” Mimeo, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Google Scholar
  8. Farrell, M. J. (1976): “Liberalism in the Theory of Social Choice.”Review of Economic Studies 43: 3–10.Google Scholar
  9. Gaertner, W., and Krüger, L. (1981): “Self Supporting Preferences and Individual Rights: The Possibility of a Paretian Libertarianism.”Economica 48: 17–28.Google Scholar
  10. Gardenfors, P. (1981): “Rights Games and Social Choice.”Nous 15: 341–356.Google Scholar
  11. Gardner, R. (1976): “Game Theoretic Remarks on Gibbard's Liberatian Social Choice Functions,” Mimeo, Department of Economics, Iowa State University.Google Scholar
  12. Gibbard, A. (1974): “A Pareto-Consistent Libertarian Cliam.”Journal of Economic Theory 7: 388–410.Google Scholar
  13. Hayek, F. A. (1973):Law Legislation and Liberty. A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  14. Karni, E. (1978): “Collective Rationality, Unanimity and Liberal Ethics.”Review of Economic Studies 45: 571–574.Google Scholar
  15. Kelly, J. S. (1976): “Right Exercising and a Pareto-Consistent Libertarian Claim.”Journal of Economic Theory 13: 138–153.Google Scholar
  16. Krüger, L., and Gaertner, W. (1983): “Alternative Libertarian Claims and Sen's Paradox.”Theory and Decision 15: 211–225.Google Scholar
  17. Nath, S. K. (1976): “Liberalism, Pareto Principle and the Core of a Society.” Mimeo, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
  18. Nozick, R. (1974):Anarchy, State and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Packard, D. J. (1979): “Preference Relations”.Journal of Mathematical Psychology 19: 295–306.Google Scholar
  20. Seidl, C. (1975): “On Liberal Values.”Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 35: 257–292.Google Scholar
  21. Sen, A. K. (1970a): “The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal.”Journal of Political Economy 78: 152–157.Google Scholar
  22. — (1970b):Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco: Holden Day; and Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
  23. — (1976): “Liberty, Unanimity and Rights.”Economica 43: 217–245.Google Scholar
  24. — (1983): “Liberty and Social Choice.”The Journal of Philosophy 80: 5–18.Google Scholar
  25. Smith, A. (1786):An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
  26. Suzumura, K. (1980): “Liberal Paradox and the Voluntary Exchange of Right Exercising.”Journal of Economic Theory 22: 407–422.Google Scholar
  27. Wriglesworth, J. L. (1985):Libertarian Conflicts in Social Choice. Cambrdge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alon Harel
    • 1
  • Shmuel Nitzan
    • 2
  1. 1.OxfordEngland
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations