Theory of the rotation of the rigid earth
- 135 Downloads
- 168 Citations
Abstract
An analytical theory is developed for planes normal to the angular-momentum axis, to the figure axis, and to the rotational axis of the triaxial rigid Earth. One of the purposes of this paper is to determine the effect on nutation and precession of Eckertet al.'s improvement to Brown's tables of the Moon and to check Woolard's theory from a different point of view. The present theory is characterized by the use of Andoyer variables, a moving reference plane, and Hori's averaging perturbation method. A comparison with Woolard's results shows that (1) the maximum difference in nutation for the plane normal to the angular-momentum axis, calculated from the same constants as Woolard adopted, reaches 0″.0017, (2) the discrepancy in Oppolzer terms is large compared with the discrepancy in nutation for the plane normal to the angular-momentum axis, and (3) the present theory does not include some of the secular terms that are incorporated in Woolard's theory and that have an effect on the establishment of a reference system. The nutation coefficients ≥0″.0001 for the three above-mentioned planes are calculated by using the numerical values recommended at the working meeting of the International Astronomical Union held in Washington in September 1974. The effects on precession and nutation due to the higher geopotential (n≥3) are also investigated. Any future revision of the lunar theory will not alter the values of the coefficients of the nutational terms derived here.
Keywords
Maximum Difference Rotational Axis Reference System Perturbation Method Analytical TheoryPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Andoyer, H.: 1911,Bull. Astron. Paris 28, 66.Google Scholar
- Andoyer, H.: 1923,Cours de Mechanique Celeste, Vol. 1, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, p. 54.Google Scholar
- Brown, E. W.: 1919,Tables of the Motion of the Moon, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
- de Sitter, W.: 1938,Bull. Astron. Netherlands 8, 213.Google Scholar
- Eckert, W. J., Walker, M. J., and Eckert, D.: 1966,Astron. J. 71, 314.Google Scholar
- Fricke, W.: 1971,Celes. Mech. 4, 150.Google Scholar
- Gaposchkin, E. M., Williamson, M. R., Kozai, Y., and Mendes, G.: 1973, inSmithsonian Astrophys. Obs. Special Report, No. 353, pp. 282, 290.Google Scholar
- Hill, G. W.: 1893,Astron. J. 13, 1.Google Scholar
- Hori, G.: 1966,Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 18, 287.Google Scholar
- Kinoshita, H.: 1972,Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 24, 423.Google Scholar
- Kinoshita, H.: 1975,Smithsonian Astrophys. Obs. Special Report, No. 364.Google Scholar
- Kinoshita, H., Hori, G., and Nakai, H.: 1974,Annals Tokyo Astron. Obs. 14, 14.Google Scholar
- Kozai, Y. and Kinoshita, H.: 1973,Celes. Mech. 7, 356.Google Scholar
- Newcomb, S.: 1895,Astron. Papers Amer. Ephemeris 6, pt. 1.Google Scholar
- Newcomb, S.: 1906,A Compendium of Spherical Astronomy, Macmillan, New York, Chap. 10.Google Scholar
- Tisserand, F.: 1892,Méchanique Céleste, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, Chap. 16–19.Google Scholar
- Wong, S. K. and Reinbold, S. J.: 1973,Nature 241, 111.Google Scholar
- Woolard, E. W.: 1953,Astron. Papers Amer. Ephemeris 15, pt. 1.Google Scholar