Advertisement

Mineralogy and Petrology

, Volume 64, Issue 1–4, pp 237–263 | Cite as

The IMA Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names: procedures and guidelines on mineral nomenclature, 1998

  • E. H. Nickel
  • J. D. Grice
Article

Summary

An author wishing to introduce a new mineral name into the literature, or to redefine, discredit or rename an existing mineral, must obtain prior approval of the IMA Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names. This paper outlines the procedure to be followed in the preparation and submission of a proposal for approval, and describes how such proposals are handled by the Commission. The paper also gives general guidelines on mineral nomenclature and provides a list of nomenclature changes approved since 1987.

Keywords

Geochemistry General Guideline Prior Approval Nomenclature Change Mineral Nomenclature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Zusammenfassung

Autoren, die einen neuen Mineralnamen in die Literatur einführen, oder einen solchen neu definieren, abschaffen oder ein schon bekanntes Mineral mit einem neuen Namen belegen wollen, müssen dafür vorher die Zustimmung der IMA Commission of New Minerals and Mineral Names einholen. In dieser Arbeit wird die empfohlene Vorgangsweise für die Vorbereitung und Einreichung eines Antrages dargestellt. Ebenso wird die Vorgangsweise der Kommission, die sich mit solchen Anträgen befaßt, in Übersicht gebracht. Weiters geben wir allgemeine Hinweise zur Nomenklatur von Mineralen und geben eine Liste von Nomenklatur-Änderungen vor, die seit 1987 genehmigt worden ist.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen FM (1992) Mineral definition by HRTEM: problems and opportunities. Rev Mineral 27: 289–333Google Scholar
  2. Bailey SW (1981) A system of nomenclature for regular interstratifications. Can Min 19: 651–655Google Scholar
  3. Bailey SW, Frank-Kamenetskii VA, Goldsztaub S, Kato A, Pabst A, Schulz H, Taylor HF W, Fleischer M, Wilson AJC (1978) Report of the International Mineralogical Association (IMA): International Union of Crystallography (IUCr) joint meeting on nomenclature. Can Min 16: 113–117Google Scholar
  4. Bayliss P, Levinson AA (1988) A system of nomenclature for rare-earth mineral species: revision and extension. Am Min 73: 422–423Google Scholar
  5. Bloss FD, Gunter M, Su SC, Wolfe HE (1983) Gladstone-Dale constants: a new approach. Can Min 21: 93–99Google Scholar
  6. Criddle AJ, Stanley CJ (eds) (1983) Quantitative data file for ore minerals, 3rd ed. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Dana JD (1854) A system of mineralogy, 4th ed. John Wiley & Son, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. —— (1868) A system of mineralogy, 5th ed. John Wiley & Son, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Donnay G, Fleischer M (1970) Suggested outline for new mineral descriptions. Am Min 55: 1017–1019Google Scholar
  10. Dunn PJ (1977) From unknown to known: the characterization of new mineral species. Min Rec 8: 341–349Google Scholar
  11. —— (1988) Protocols for scientists on the deposition of investigated mineral specimens. Am Min 73: 1480Google Scholar
  12. —— (1990) The discreditation of mineral species. Am Min 75: 928–929Google Scholar
  13. —— (1987) Formal definitions of type mineral specimens. Am Min 72: 1269–1270Google Scholar
  14. —— (1988) The Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names of the International Mineralogical Association; its history, purpose and general practice. Min Rec 19: 319–323Google Scholar
  15. Fleischer M (1970) Procedures of the International Mineralogical Association Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names. Am Min 55: 1016–1017Google Scholar
  16. Gladstone JH, Dale TP (1864) Researches on the refraction, dispersion, and sensitiveness of the liquids. Phil Trans Roy Soc 153: 317–343Google Scholar
  17. Guinier A et al. (1984) Nomenclature of polytype structures. Report of the International Union of Crystallography Ad-Hoc Committee on the Nomenclature of Disordered, Modulated and Polytype Structures. Acta Cryst A40: 399–404Google Scholar
  18. Harris DC, Cabri LJ (1991) Nomenclature of platinum-group-element alloys: review and revision. Can Min 29: 231–237Google Scholar
  19. Hey MH, Guillemin C, Permingeat F, de Roever JP (1961) Sur la nomenclature Minéralogique. Décisions de la Commission des Nouveaux Minéraux et des Nomes de Minéraux de L'Association Internationale de Minéralogie. Bull Soc franç Min Crist 84: 96–105Google Scholar
  20. —— (1980) On the use of names, prefixes and suffixes, and adjectival modifiers in the mineralogical nomenclature. Am Min 65: 223–224Google Scholar
  21. Hogarth DD (1977) Classification and nomenclature of the pyrochlore group. Am Min 62: 403–410Google Scholar
  22. Leake BE et al. (1997) Nomenclature of amphiboles: report of the Subcommittee on Amphiboles of the International Mineralogical Association Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names. Can Min 35: 219–246Google Scholar
  23. Levinson AA (1966) A system of nomenclature for rare-earth minerals. Am Min 51: 152–158Google Scholar
  24. Makovicky E (1989) Modular classification of sulphosalts ∼ current status. Definition and application of homologous series. N Jb Min Abh 160: 269–297Google Scholar
  25. —— (1981) Non-commensurate (misfit) structures. Structure and Bonding 46: 103–176Google Scholar
  26. —— (1977) Chemistry and crystallography of the lillianite homologous series. N Jb Min Abh 130: 264–287Google Scholar
  27. Mandarino JA (1981a) Comments on the calculation of the density of minerals. Can Min 19: 531–534Google Scholar
  28. —— (1981b) The Gladstone-Dale relationship, part IV. The compatibility concept and its application. Can Min 19: 441–450Google Scholar
  29. —— (1987) The check-list for submission of proposals for new minerals to the Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names, International Mineralogical Association. Can Min 25: 775–783Google Scholar
  30. —— (1984) Rules of procedure of the Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names, International Mineralogical Association. Can Min 22: 367–368Google Scholar
  31. Morimoto et al. (1989) Nomenclature of pyroxenes. Can Min 27: 143–156Google Scholar
  32. Nickel EH (1992) Solid solutions in mineral nomenclature. Can Min 30: 231–234Google Scholar
  33. —— (1993) Standardization of polytype suffixes. Can Min 31: 767–768Google Scholar
  34. —— (1995a) Definition of a mineral. Min Petrol 55: 323–326Google Scholar
  35. —— (1995b) Mineral names applied to synthetic substances. Min Petrol 57: 261–262Google Scholar
  36. —— (1987) Procedures involving the IMA Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names and guidelines on mineral nomenclature. Min Petrol 37: 157–179Google Scholar
  37. Ramsdell LS (1947) Studies on silicon carbide. Am Min 32: 64–82Google Scholar
  38. Schaller WT (1930) Adjectival ending of chemical elements used as modifiers to mineral names. Am Min 15: 567–574Google Scholar
  39. Veblen DR (1991) Polysomatism and polysomatic series: a review and applications. Am Min 76: 801–826Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. H. Nickel
    • 1
  • J. D. Grice
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Exploration & MiningCSIROWembleyAustralia
  2. 2.Mineral Sciences DivisionCanadian Museum of NatureOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations