Advertisement

Toxicity test procedures forHyalella azteca, and chronic toxicity of cadmium and pentachlorophenol toH. azteca, Gammarus fasciatus, andDaphnia magna

  • U. Borgmann
  • K. M. Ralph
  • W. P. Norwood
Article

Abstract

Survival, growth, and reproduction ofHyalella azteca were determined under various test conditions. Reproduction by a cohort begins when the amphipods are 5 to 6 weeks old, peaks at 8 to 12 weeks, and then declines due to continuing adult mortality. Full life-cycle tests can be completed in 12 to 14 weeks at 25°C. Reproduction is poor when only artificial plastic substrate is provided. A substrate of cotton gauze results in dramatic improvements in both reproduction and growth. Better reproduction can be obtained by culturing the amphipods in some sediments, but this makes weekly enumeration difficult. Increased mortality during chronic exposure to cadmium was observed at 1 μg/L forH. azteca and 3.2 μg/L forGammarus fasciatus. Reproduction during longer exposure was not reduced at concentrations lower than those causing increased mortality within six weeks. Chronic toxicity of pentachlorophenol was observed at 100 μg/L for both species. Chronic toxicity toDaphnia magna was similar to that of the amphipods for cadmium, but lower for pentachlorophenol. Amphipods are at least as sensitive asDaphnia to a variety of toxicants during chronic exposure.

Keywords

Toxicity Waste Water Cadmium Water Management Water Pollution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson RL (1982) Toxicity of fenvalerate and permethrin to several nontarget aquatic invertebrates. Environ Entomol 11:1251–1257Google Scholar
  2. Anderson RS, Raasveldt LG (1974)Gammarus predation and the possible effects ofGammarus andChaoborus feeding on the Zooplankton composition in some small lakes and ponds in western Canada. Can Wildl Serv Occas Paper 18, Information Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  3. Arthur JW, Eaton JG (1971) Chloramine toxicity to the amphipodGammarus pseudolimnaeus and the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). J Fish Res Board Can 28:1841–1845Google Scholar
  4. Arthur JW, Leonard EN (1970) Effects of copper onGammarus pseudolimnaeus, Physa integra, andCampeloma decisum in soft water. J Fish Res Board Can 27:1277–1283Google Scholar
  5. Barton DR, Hynes HBN (1976) The distribution of amphipoda and isopoda on the exposed shores of the Great Lakes. J Great Lakes Res 2:207–214Google Scholar
  6. Biesinger KE, Christensen GM (1972) Effects of various metals on survival, growth, reproduction, and metabolism ofDaphnia magna. J Fish Res Board Can 29:1691–1700Google Scholar
  7. Borgmann U, Shear H, Moore J (1984) Zooplankton and potential fish production in Lake Ontario. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 41:1303–1309Google Scholar
  8. Borgmann U, Whittle DM (1983) Particle-size-conversion efficiency and contaminant concentrations in Lake Ontario biota. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 40:328–336Google Scholar
  9. Brandt SB (1986) Ontogenetic shifts in habitat, diet, and dielfeeding periodicity of slimy sculpin in Lake Ontario. Trans Am Fish Soc 115:711–715Google Scholar
  10. Clemens HP (1950) Life cycle and ecology ofGammarus fasciatus Say. Ohio State University, Franz Theodore Stone Institute of Hydrobiology, Put-in-Bay, Ohio, Contrib No 12Google Scholar
  11. Cook DG, Johnson MG (1974) Benthic macroinvertebrates of the St. Lawrence Great Lakes. J Fish Res Board Can 31:763–782Google Scholar
  12. de March BGE (1977) The effects of photoperiod and temperature on the induction and termination of reproductive resting stage in the freshwater amphipodHyalella azteca (Saussure). Can J Zool 55:1595–1600Google Scholar
  13. — (1978) The effects of constant and variable temperatures on the size, growth, and reproduction of the freshwater amphipodHyalella azteca (Saussure). Can J Zool 56:1801–1806Google Scholar
  14. Dryer WR, Erkkila LF, Tetzloff CL (1965) Food of lake trout in Lake Superior. Trans Am Fish Soc 94:169–176Google Scholar
  15. Elnabarawy MT, Welter AN, Robideau RR (1986) Relative sensitivity of three daphnid species to selected organic and inorganic chemicals. Environ Toxicol Chem 5:393–398Google Scholar
  16. Fox ME, Carey JH, Oliver HG (1983) Compartmental distribution of organochlorine contaminants in the Niagara River and the western basin of Lake Ontario. J Great Lakes Res 9:287–294Google Scholar
  17. Green DWJ, Williams KA, Pascoe D (1985) Studies on the acute toxicity of pollutants to freshwater macroinvertebrates. 2. Phenol. Arch Hydrobiol 103:75–82Google Scholar
  18. Halligan BJ, Eaton JG (1978) Survival and reproduction ofGammarus lacustris andG. pseudolimnaeus under two experimental conditions. Progressive Fish-Culturist 40:59–62Google Scholar
  19. Hargrave BT (1970) Distribution, growth, and seasonal abundance ofHyalella azteca (Amphipoda) in relation to sediment microflora. J Fish Res Board Can 27:685–699Google Scholar
  20. Johnson MG, McNeil OC (1986) Changes in abundance and species composition in benthic macroinvertebrate communities of the Bay of Quinte, 1966–84. Can Spec Publ Fish Aquat Sci 86:177–189Google Scholar
  21. Johnson MG, McNeil OC, George SE (1987) Benthic macroinvertebrate associations in relation to environmental factors in Georgian Bay. J Great Lakes Res 13:310–327Google Scholar
  22. Lee H-B, Weng L-D, Chau ASY (1984) Chemical derivatization analysis of pesticide residues. VIII. Analysis of 15 chlorophenols in natural water byin situ acetylation. J Assoc Offic Anal Chem 67:789–794Google Scholar
  23. Macek KJ, Buxton KS, Derr SK, Dean JW, Sauter S (1976a) Chronic toxicity of lindane to selected aquatic invertebrates and fishes. US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, MN, Ecol Res Ser EPA-600/3-76-046Google Scholar
  24. Macek KJ, Buxton KS, Sauter S, Gnilka S, Dean JW (1976b) Chronic toxicity of atrazine to selected aquatic invertebrates and fishes. US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, MN, Ecol Res Ser EPA-600/3-76-047Google Scholar
  25. Nalepa TF (1987) Long-term changes in the macrobenthos of southern Lake Michigan. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 44:515–524Google Scholar
  26. Poulton DJ (1987) Trace contaminant status of Hamilton Harbour. J Great Lakes Res 13:193–201Google Scholar
  27. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. WH Freeman and Co, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  28. Sundelin B (1983) Effects of cadmium onPontoporeia affinis (Crustacea: Amphipoda) in laboratory soft-bottom microcosms. Mar Biol 74:203–212Google Scholar
  29. Sunda WG, Engel DW, Thuotte RM (1978) Effect of chemical speciation on toxicity of cadmium to grass shrimp,Palaemonetes pugio: Importance of free cadmium ion. Environ Sci Technol 12:409–413Google Scholar
  30. Whittle DM, Fitzsimons JD (1983) The influence of the Niagara River on contaminant burdens of Lake Ontario biota. J Great Lakes Res 9:295–302Google Scholar
  31. Williams KA, Green DWJ, Pascoe D (1985) Studies on the acute toxicity of pollutants to freshwater macroinvertebrates. 1. Cadmium. Arch Hydrobiol 102:461–471Google Scholar
  32. Winnell MH, Jude DJ (1987) Benthic community structure and composition among rocky habitats in the Great Lakes and Keuka Lake, New York. J Great Lakes Res 13:3–17Google Scholar
  33. Winner RW (1988) Evaluation of the relative sensitivities of 7-dDaphnia magna andCeriodaphnia dubia toxicity tests for cadmium and sodium pentachlorophenate. Environ Toxicol Chem 7:153–159Google Scholar
  34. Wojcik JA, Evans MS, Jude DJ (1986) Food of deepwater sculpin,Myoxocephalus thompsoni, from southeastern Lake Michigan. J Great Lakes Res 12:225–231Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. Borgmann
    • 1
  • K. M. Ralph
    • 1
  • W. P. Norwood
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Fisheries and OceansGreat Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic SciencesBurlingtonCanada

Personalised recommendations