Organic functional group analysis via gas chromatography. III
- 31 Downloads
- 4 Citations
Summary
A gas Chromatographic procedure for the analysis of carbamates is described. A specially prepared reaction tube, packed with a 10 % mixture of potassium hydroxide in glass beads, is placed inside the injection port of a Perkin-Elmer 900 Gas Chromatograph, in front of the Chromatographic column packed with Porapak Q. S.
A solution of the carbamates (0.01–0.1μmol) is injected directly into the gas Chromatograph. The carbamates are reacted with the alkali present in the reaction tube and the alcohols produced are separated, detected and recorded. Standard calibration graphs of the alcohols are prepared in the same manner and the quantities of carbamates are determined. The procedure is fast and quantitative.
Keywords
Alcohol Hydroxide Chromatographic Column Glass Bead CarbamateZusammenfassung
Ein gaschromatisches Verfahren für die Analyse von Carbamaten wurde beschrieben. Ein spezielles Reaktionsrohr, beschickt mit 10% iger Kalilauge auf Glasperlen, wird innerhalb der Injektionsöffnung eines Gaschromatographen Perkin-Elmer 900 vor dem mit Poropak Q. S. gefüllten Chromatographierohr angebracht. Die Carbamatlösung (0,01 bis 0,1 μMol) wird direkt injiziert. Die Carbamate reagieren mit dem im Reaktionsrohr befindlichen Alkali, die dabei entstandenen Alkohole werden getrennt, nachgewiesen und registriert. In gleicher Weise ermittelte Standard-Eichkurven der Alkohole dienen zur Bestimmung der Carbamate. Das Verfahren ist rasch und quantitativ.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.T. S. Ma, C. T. Shang, and E. Manche, Mikrochim. Acta [Wien],1964, 571.Google Scholar
- 2.M. M. Schachter and T. S. Ma, Mikrochim. Acta [Wien]1966, 55.Google Scholar
- 3.L. V. Kolesnik and M. N. Chumachenko, Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, Ser. Khim1969, 2107.Google Scholar
- 4.S. Araki, S. Suzuki, and M. Kitano, Japan Analyst18, 608 (1969).Google Scholar
- 5.E. R. Bissell and D. B. Fields, J. Chromat. Sci.10, 164.Google Scholar
- 6.C. L. Hanson and R. C. Smith, Analyt. Chemistry44, 1571 (1972).Google Scholar
- 7.S. Siggia, L. R. Whitlock, and J. C. Tao, Analyt. Chemistry41, 1387 (1969).Google Scholar
- 8.S. P. Frankoski and S. Siggia, Analyt. Chemistry44, 507 (1972).Google Scholar
- 9.S. P. Frankoski and S. Siggia, Analyt. Chemistry44, 2078 (1972).Google Scholar
- 10.T. S. Ma, Record of Chemical Progress26, 113 (1965).Google Scholar
- 11.J. R. Plimmer in A. Standen (ed.), Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 2nd edition, Vol. 22. New York: Wiley. 1970. p. 191.Google Scholar
- 12.R. I. Metcalf and T. R. Fukuto, J. Agr. Food Chem.13, 220 (1965).Google Scholar
- 13.R. I. Fryer in C. K. Cain (ed.), Annual Reports on Medicinal Chemistry, Vol. 6, New York: Academic Press. 1971. p. 6.Google Scholar
- 14.N. D. Cheronis and T. S. Ma, Organic Functional Group Analysis, New York: Wiley. 1964. p. 315.Google Scholar
- 15.G. Lundquist and C. E. Meloan, Analyt. Chemistry43, 1122 (1971).Google Scholar
- 16.R. C. Hall and C. S. Giam, Analyt. Chemistry42, 423 (1970).Google Scholar
- 17.C. C. Cassil, R. P. Stanovick, and R. F. Cook, Residue Rev.26, 63 (1969).PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.T. S. Ma and D. Spiegel, Microchem. J.10, 61 (1966).Google Scholar