Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology

, Volume 119, Issue 8, pp 450–456 | Cite as

The EnDA endometrial adenocarcinoma: an oestrogen-sensitive, metastasizing, in vivo tumour model of the rat

  • Daniel W. Horn
  • Günter Vollmer
  • Friedrich Deerberg
  • Martin R. Schneider
Original Papers Experimental Oncology

Abstract

A high percentage of endometrial carcinomas contain oestrogen and progesterone receptors. For endocrine therapy of recurrent endometrial carcinoma, only high-dose progestins are in clinical use. As, therefore, the development of new endocrine treatment strategies is of great interest, suitable animal models for this tumour are essential. Up to now, only human tumour xenografts transplanted in immune-deficient nude mice, but no syngeneic in vivo tumour models, have been available. In the present article we describe the hormone sensitivity of the EnDA endometrial adenocarcinoma of the DA/Han rat growing as s.c. implants in DA/Han rats and athymic nude mice in serial passage. In both species, the tumour expresses oestrogen, but no progesterone receptors. Transplanted in DA/Han rats or nude mice, ovariectomy reduced tumour weight by 64% and 46% respectively. In both species substitution of ovariectomized animals with oestradiol restored tumour weights to intact control levels. Oestradiol substitution of intact animals did not further enhance tumour growth. The growth of the primary tumour was inhibited by medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) at a dose of 100 mg/kg by 67% and by tamoxifen at a dose of 20 mg/kg by 38%. Lung metastases were regularly seen in both species, although to a lesser extent in nude mice than in DA/Han rats. Tamoxifen treatment did not alter the number of lung metastases, whereas MPA or ovariectomy produced a significant reduction in the number of lung metastases. The EnDA endometrial carcinoma of the DA/Han rat with respect to its oestrogen sensitivity, oestrogen receptor expression, morphology and metastatic growth, grossly resembles a typical endometrial adenocarcinoma and can therefore be regarded as auseful in vivo experimental model for the evaluation of new endocrine treatment strategies.

Key words

EnDA endometrial carcinoma Oestrogen sensitivity Tumour metastanses In vivo 

Abbreviations

MPA

medroxyprogesterone acetate

E2

oestradiol undecylate

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carcangiu ML, Chambers JT, Voynick IM, Pirro M, Schwartz PE (1990) Immunohistochemical evaluation of estrogen and progesterone receptor content in 183 patients with endometrial carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 95: 247–254Google Scholar
  2. Cramer DW, Knapp RC (1979) Review of epidemiologic studies of endometrial cancer and exogenous estrogen. Obstet Gynecol 45: 521–526Google Scholar
  3. Cramer DW, Cutler SJ, Christine B (1974) Trends in the incidence of endometrial cancer in the United States. Gynecol Oncol 2: 130–143Google Scholar
  4. Deerberg F, Rehm S, Rapp KG (1985) Survival data and age-associated spontaneous diseases of two strains of rats. In: Archibal J, Ditchfield J, Rowsell HC (eds) The contribution of laboratory animal science to the welfare of man and animals. Fischer, Stuttgart New York pp 171–179Google Scholar
  5. EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (1973) Standards for the assessment of estrogen receptors in human breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 9: 379–381Google Scholar
  6. Giavazzi R (1991) Metastatic models. In Boven e, Winograd B (eds) The nude mouse in oncology research. CRC Press Boca Raton pp 118–132Google Scholar
  7. Goodman DG, Ward JM, Squire RA, Chu KC, Linhart MS (1979) Neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions in aging F344 rats. Appl Pharmacol 48: 237–248Google Scholar
  8. Gorodecki J, Mortel R, Ladda RL, Ward SP, Geder L, Rapp F (1979) Establishment and characterization of a new endometrial cancer cell line (SCRC-1). Am J Obstet Gynecol 135: 671–679Google Scholar
  9. Gottardis MM, Ertürk E, Rose DP (1983) Effects of progesterone administration ofN-nitrosomethylurea-induced rat mammary carcinogenesis. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 19: 1479–1484Google Scholar
  10. Gottardis MM, Ricchio ME, Satyaswaroop PG, Jordan VC (1990) Effect of steroidal and nonsteroidal antiestrogens on the growth of a tamoxifen-stimulated endometrial carcinoma (EnCa 101) in athymic mice. Cancer Res 50: 3189–3192Google Scholar
  11. Grenman SE, Dyke DL van, Worsham MJ, Rosario F del, Roberts RJ, McClatchey KD, Schwartz DR, Ramesh BaBu V, Carey TE (1988) UM-EC-1 a new hyperploid human cell line derived from a poorly differentiated endometrial cancer. Cancer Res 48: 1864–1873Google Scholar
  12. Grosso DS, Surwit EA, Davis JR, Christian CD (1984) Hormonal receptors in endometrial cancer. Prog Cancer Res Ther 31: 367–375Google Scholar
  13. Higman B, Greenman DL, Norvell MJ, Farmer J, Shellenberger TE (1980) Neoplastic and preneoplastic lesions induced in female C3H mice by diets containing diethylstibestrol or 17ß-estradiol. J Environ Pathol Toxicol 4: 81–95Google Scholar
  14. Horvath G, Stendahl U, Kalling M, Fernö M, Himmelmann A, Hajba A (1990) Antiestrogenic treatment of advanced and recurrent carcinoma corporis uteri—a Phase II study of toremifene. Anticancer Res 10: 323–326Google Scholar
  15. Jordan VC, Gottardis MM, Robinson SP, Friedl A (1989) Immune-deficient animals to study “hormone dependent” breast and endometrial cancer. J Steroid Biochem 34: 169–176Google Scholar
  16. Leclerq G (1987) Technical pitfalls, methodological improvements and quality control of steroid hormone receptors assays. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 23: 453–458Google Scholar
  17. Meissner WA, Sommers SC, Sherman G (1957) Endometrial hyperplasia, endometrial carcinoma, and endometriosis produced experimentally by estrogen. Cancer 10: 500–509Google Scholar
  18. Nagaoka T, Onodera H, Matsushima Y, Todate A, Shibutani M, Ogasawara H, Maekawa A (1982) Spontaneous uterine adenocarcinoma in aged rats and their relation to endocrine imbalance. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 116: 623–628Google Scholar
  19. Neumann F, Elger W, Nishno Y, Steinbeck H (1977) Probleme der Dosisfindung: Sexualhormone. Drug Res 27: 296–318Google Scholar
  20. Newbold RR, Bullock BC, McLachlan JA (1990) Uterine adenocarcinoma in mice following developmental treatment with estrogens: a model for hormonal carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 50: 7677–7681Google Scholar
  21. Nishida M, Kasahara K, Kaneko M, Iwasaki H (1985) Establishment of a new endometrial adenocarcinoma cell line Ishikawa cells, containing estrogen and progesterone receptors. Acta Obst Gynecol Jpn 37: 1103–1111Google Scholar
  22. Niwa K, Tanaka T, Mori H, Yokoyama Y, Furui T, Mori H, Tamaya T (1991) Rapid induction of endometrial carcinoma in ICR mice treated withN-methyl-N-nitrosourea and 17β-estradiol. Jpn J Cancer Res 82: 1391–1396Google Scholar
  23. Ogino H, Fujimoto M, Oshiro H, matsumoto K, Funahashi M, Kaneko C, Hirono I (1989) Experimental induction of uterine cancer in rats byN-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine dissolved in polyethylene glycol. Pathol Res Pract 185: 214–217Google Scholar
  24. Satyaswaroop PG, Zaino R, Clarke CL, Mortel R (1987) Nude mouse system in the study of tumor biology, treatment strategies and progesterone receptor physiology in human endometrial carcinoma. J Steroid Biochem 27: 431–438Google Scholar
  25. Scatchard G (1949) The attraction of proteins for small molecules and ions. Ann NY Acad Sci 51: 660–672Google Scholar
  26. Schulz KD, Schmidt-Rhode P, Zippel HH, Sturm G (1986) New concepts of adjuvant drug treatment in endometrial cancer. In: Schulz KD, King RJB, Pollow K, Taylor RW (eds) Endometrial cancer. Zuckschwerdt, München, pp 169–180Google Scholar
  27. Schulz KD, Zippel HH, Rück A, Hölzel F (1988) Selection and practicability of different hormonal treatment methods in endometrial cancer. Prog Cancer Res Ther 35: 445–451Google Scholar
  28. Seen HJ, Drings P, Glaus A, Jungi WF, Sauer R, Schlag P (1992) Checkliste Onkologie. In: Sturm A, Largiadèr F, Wicki O (eds) Checkliste der aktuellen Medizin. Thieme, Stuttgart New York pp 151–155Google Scholar
  29. Silverberg SG (1984) New aspects of endometrial carcinoma. Clin Obstet Gynecol 11: 189–208Google Scholar
  30. Taki I, Iijima H (1963) A new method of producing endometrial cancer in mice. Am J Obstet Gynecol 87: 926–934Google Scholar
  31. Tanaka T, Mori H (1983) Experimental induction of uterine cancer in rats byN-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine. Pathol Res Pract 178: 20–26Google Scholar
  32. Taylor RW (1987) Future aspects of endometrial cancer: a summary of the round table discussion. In: Schulz KD, King RJB, Pollow K, Taylor RW (eds) Endometrial cancer. Zuckschwerdt, München, pp 200–201Google Scholar
  33. Verdeal K, Ertürk E, Rose DP (1986) Endometrial adenomatous hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma, and multiple endocrinopathies in rats exposed toN-nitrosomethylurea. Anticancer Res 6: 5–10Google Scholar
  34. Young P, Ehrlich C, Cleary R (1976) Progesterone binding ovarian and endometrial carcinomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol 125: 353–360Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel W. Horn
    • 1
  • Günter Vollmer
    • 2
  • Friedrich Deerberg
    • 3
  • Martin R. Schneider
    • 1
  1. 1.Experimental OncologyResearch Laboratories of Schering AGBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Biochemical EndocrinologyMedical University of LübeckGermany
  3. 3.Central Institute for Laboratory Animal BreedingHannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations