Structural optimization

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 36–47 | Cite as

Optimization of acoustic response

  • M. Tinnsten
  • B. Esping
  • M. Jonsson
Research Papers


The expression “acoustic optimization” can be applied to numerous different disciplines within the field of acoustics. From seismic waves, sound in the atmosphere through bioacoustic, psychoacoustics, and room and theater acoustics over shock and vibration in mechanical structures. This paper deals with the latter. Sound generated by vibrating structures is often called noise which is to be minimized. However, not all vibrating structures produce noise, for example the violin is also a vibrating structure that in most people's opinion produces sound called music. In the case of the violin, great effort is made not to minimize but to optimize the sound, i.e. to get the “right” sound out of the structure. Acoustic optimization within this discipline involves automatic changes of structural design variables to obtain minimum or specified sound in specified regions inside or outside the structure. Examples of problem formulations and some theoretical considerations in the field of acoustic optimization in connection with vibrating mechanical structures will be pointed out. Four simple test cases are included as numerical examples of the method proposed.


Atmosphere Civil Engineer Design Variable Acoustics Problem Formulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Banerjee, P.K. 1994:The boundary element methods in engineering. London: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  2. Constants, E.W.; Belegundu, A.D.; Koopmann, G.H. 1998: Design approach for minimizing sound power from vibrating shell structures.AIAA J. 36, 134–139Google Scholar
  3. Esping, B. 1986: The OASIS structural optimization system.Comp. & Struct. 23, 365–377Google Scholar
  4. Esping, B. 1995: Design optimization as an engineering tool.Struct. Optim. 10, 137–152Google Scholar
  5. Esping, B.; Clarin, P.; Romell, O. 1993: OCTOPUS—A tool for distributed optimization of multi-disciplinary objectives.Int. Seies Num. Math. 110, 1165–1194. Basel: BirkhäuserGoogle Scholar
  6. Esping, B.; Holm, D.; Romell, O. 1993: The OASIS-ALADDIN structural optimization system.Int. Series Num. Math. 110, 159–186. Basel: BirkhäuserGoogle Scholar
  7. Johansen, T.F. 1991:Implementation and use of a numerical technique for studies of directional properties of the sound radiation from Horn loudspeakers. Doctoral Thesis, Institutt for Teleteknikk, TrondheimGoogle Scholar
  8. Lamancusa, J.S. 1994: Design optimization methods for rectangular panels with minimal sound radiation.AIAA J. 32, 472–479Google Scholar
  9. Svanberg, K. 1987: MMA — Method of moving asymptotes — A new method for structural optimization.Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng. 24, 359–373Google Scholar
  10. St. Pierre, R.L., Jr.; Koopmann, G.H. 1995: A design method for minimizing the sound power radiated from plates by adding optimally sized, discrete masses.J. Mech. Des. 117, 243–251Google Scholar
  11. Svanberg, K. 1993: The method of moving asymptotes (MMA) with some extensions. In: Rozvany, G.I.N. (ed.)Optimization of large structural systems (Proc. NATO/DFG ASI, held in Berchtesgaden, Germany, 1991), pp. 555–578. Dordrecht: KluwerGoogle Scholar
  12. Tinnsten, M. 1994: Numerical prediction of acoustic pressure and intensity.Mid Sweden Univ. Report 1994:27 Google Scholar
  13. Tinnsten, M.; Jonsson, M.; Johansson, Ö. 1998: Prediction and verification of acoustic radiation.Acta Acustica (accepted)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Tinnsten
    • 1
  • B. Esping
    • 1
  • M. Jonsson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Science and TechnologyMid Sweden UniversityÖstersundSweden
  2. 2.Division of Computer Aided DesignLuleå University of TechnologyLuleåSweden

Personalised recommendations