Radiation and Environmental Biophysics

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 239–244

The quality of DNA double-strand breaks: A Monte Carlo simulation of the end-structure of strand breaks produced by protons and alpha particles

  • A. Ottolenghi
  • M. Merzagora
  • L. Tallone
  • M. Durante
  • H. G. Paretzke
  • W. E. Wilson
Original Paper


The quality of DNA damage induced by protons and α-particles of various linear energy transfer (LET) was studied. The aim was to single out specific lesions in the DNA molecule that might lead to biological endpoints such as inactivation. A DNA model coupled with a track structure code (MOCA-15) were used to simulate the lesions induced on the two helixes. Four categories of DNA breaks were considered: single-strand breaks (ssb), bluntended double-strand breaks (dsb, with no or few overlapping bases), sticky-ended double-strand breaks (with cohesive free ends of many bases), and deletions (complex lesions which involve at least two dsb within a small number of base pairs). Calculations were carried out assuming various sets of parameters characterizing the production of these different DNA breaks. No large variations in the yields of ssb and blunt- or sticky-ended dsb were found in the LET range between 10 and 200 keV/µm. On the other hand, the yield of deletions increases up to about 100 keV/µm and seems to reach a plateau at higher LET values. In the LET interval from 30 to 60 keV/µm, protons proved to be more efficient than α-particles in inducing deletions. The induction of these complex lesions is thus dependent not simply on LET but also on the characteristics of the track structure. Comparison with RBE values for cell killing shows that this special class of dsb might play an important role in radiation-induced cell inactivation.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barendsen GW (1964) Impairment of the proliferative capacity of human cells in culture bya-particles with differing linear energy transfer. Int J Radiat Biol 8:453–466Google Scholar
  2. Barendsen GW (1994) The relationships between RBE and LET for different types of lethal damage in mammalian cells: biophysical and molecular mechanisms. Radiat Res 139:257–270Google Scholar
  3. Belli M, Cera F, Cherubim R, Goodhead DT, Ianzini F, Jenner T, Moschini G, Sapora O, Simone G, Stevens DL, Stretch A, Tabocchini MA, Tiveron P (1992) Relevance of experiments with different charged particles having the same LET for biophysical modelling of radiation effects. In: Chadwick KH, Moschini G, Varma MN (eds) Biophysical modelling of radiation effects. Adam Hilger, Bristol, pp 285–292Google Scholar
  4. Belli M, Cera F, Cherubini R, Ianzini F, Moschini G, Sapora O, Simone G, Tabocchini MA, Tiveron P (1994) DNA double-strand breaks induced by low energy protons in V79 cells. Int J Radiat Biol 65:529–536Google Scholar
  5. Blöcher D (1982) DNA double-strand breaks in Ehrlich ascites tumour cells at low doses of X-rays. I. Determination of induced breaks by centrifugation at low speed. Int J Radiat Biol 42:317–328Google Scholar
  6. Blöcher D (1988) DNA double-strand break repair determines the RBE of α-particles. Int J Radiat Biol 54:761–771Google Scholar
  7. Bryant PE (1990) Restriction endonuclease- and radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks and chromosomal aberrations: similarities and differences. In: Obe G, Natarajan AT (eds) Chromosomal aberrations: basic and applied aspects. Springer, Heidelberg New York Berlin, pp 61–69Google Scholar
  8. Bryant PE, Johnston PJ (1993) Restriction-endonuclease-induced DNA double-strand breaks and chromosomal aberrations in mammalian cells. Mutation Res 299:289–296Google Scholar
  9. Charlton DE, Humm JL (1988) A method of calculating initial DNA strand breakage following decay of incorporation125I. Int J Radiat Biol 53:353–365Google Scholar
  10. Charlton DE, Nikjoo H, Humm JL (1989) Calculations of initial yield of single- and double-strand breaks in cell nuclei from electrons, protons and alpha particles. Int J Radiat Biol 56:1–19Google Scholar
  11. Charlton DE, Nikjoo H, Goodhead DT (1991) Energy deposition in sub-microscopic volumes. In: Dewey WC, Edington M, Fry RIM, Hall EJ, Whitmore GF (eds) Radiation research: a twentieth century prospective, Vol 2. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 421–426Google Scholar
  12. Cole A, Meyn RE, Chen R, Corry PM, Hittelman W (1980) Mechanism of cell injury. In: Meyn RE, Withers HR (eds) Radiation biology in cancer research. Raven Press, New York, pp 35–58Google Scholar
  13. Cornforth MN, Goodwin EH (1991) The dose-dependent fragmentation of chromatin in human fibroblasts by 3.5 MeV α-particles from238Pu: experimental and theoretical considerations pertaining to single-track effects. Radiat Res 127:64–74Google Scholar
  14. Durante M, Grossi GF, Napolitano M, Gialanella G (1991) Repair of potentially lethal damage by introduction of T4 DNA ligase in eucaryotic cells. Int J Radiat Biol 59:963–971Google Scholar
  15. Frankenberg D, Frankenberg-Schwager M, Blöcher D, Adamczyk C (1980) Initial and irreparable double strand-breaks in the DNA of irradiation eukaryotic cells in dependence of dose rate and LET; implication for survival studies. Proc. 7th Symposium on Microdosimetry, p 1033Google Scholar
  16. Frankenberg D, Frankenberg-Schwager M, Blöcher D, Harbich R (1981) Evidence for DNA double-strand breaks as the criticallesions in yeast cells irradiated with sparsely or densely ionising radiation under oxic or anoxic conditions. Radiat Res 88:524–532Google Scholar
  17. Frankenberg-Schwager M (1990) Induction, repair and biological relevance of radiation-induced DNA lesions in eukaryotic cells. Radiat Environ Biophys 29:273–292Google Scholar
  18. Goodhead DT (1984) Deduction from cellular studies of inactivation, mutagenesis, and transformation. In: Boice JD Jr, Fraumeni JF Jr (eds) Radiation carcinogenesis: epidemiology and biological significance. Raven Press, New York, pp 369–385Google Scholar
  19. Hagen U (1994) Mechanisms of induction and repair of DNA double-strand breaks by ionizing radiation: some contradictions. Radiat Environ Biophys 33:45–61Google Scholar
  20. Hamm RN, Turner JE (1992) Model calculation of radiation induced DNA damage. In: Chadwick KH, Moschini G, Varma MN (eds) Biophysical modelling of radiation effects. Adam Hilger, Bristol, pp 53–60Google Scholar
  21. Henss S, Paretzke HG (1992) Biophysical modelling of radiation induced damage in chromosomes. In: Chadwick KH, Moschini G, Varma MN (eds) Biophysical modelling of radiation effects. Adam Hilger, Bristol, pp 69–76Google Scholar
  22. Jenner TJ, Belli M, Goodhead DT, Ianzini F, Simone G, Tabocchini MA (1992) Direct comparison of biological effectiveness of protons and alpha particles of the same LET. III. Initial yield of DNA double-strand breaks in V79 cells. Int J Radiat Biol 61:631–637Google Scholar
  23. Jenner TJ, deLara CM, O'Neil P, Stevens L (1993) Induction and rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks in V79-4 mammalian cells following γ and α irradiation. Int J Radiat Biol 64:265–273Google Scholar
  24. Kampf G, Eichorn E (1983) DNA strand breakage by different radiation qualities and relations to cell killing: further results after the influence of α-particles and carbon ions. Stud Biophys 93:17–26Google Scholar
  25. Kiefer J (1992) Heavy-ion effects on cells: chromosomal aberrations, mutations and neoplastic transformation. Rad Environ Biophys 31:279–288Google Scholar
  26. Michalik V (1992) Model of DNA damage induced by radiations of various qualitites. Int J Radiat Biol 62:9–20Google Scholar
  27. Napolitano M, Durante M, Grossi GF, Pugliese M, Gialanella G (1992) Inactivation of C3H 10T1/2 cells by monoenergetie high LET α-particles. Int J Radiat Biol 61:813–820Google Scholar
  28. Neary GJ, Simpson-Gildemaister VF, Peacock AR (1970) The influence of radiation quality and oxygen on strand breakage in dry DNA. Int J Radiat Biol 18:25–40Google Scholar
  29. Neary GJ, Horgan VJ, Bance DA, Stretch A (1972) Further data on DNA strand breakage by various radiation qualities. Int J Radiat Biol 22:525–537Google Scholar
  30. Paretzke HG (1987) Radiation track structure theory. In: Freeman GR (ed) Kinetics of nonhomogeneous processes. Wiley, New York, pp 89–170Google Scholar
  31. Roots R, Holley W, Chatterjee A, Irizarry M, Kraft G (1990) The formation of strand breaks in DNA after high-LET radiation: a comparison of data from in vitro and cellular systems. Int J Radiat Biol 58:55–69Google Scholar
  32. Siddiqi MA, Bothe E (1987) Single- and double-strand breaks formation in DNA irradited in aqueous solution: dependence on dose and OH radical scavenger concentration. Radiat Res 112:449–463Google Scholar
  33. Sontag W, Knedlitschek G, Weibezahn KF, Dertinger H (1990) The DNA content of some mammalian cells measured by flow cytometry and its influence on radiation sensitivity. Int J Radiat Biol 57:1183–1193Google Scholar
  34. Wulf H, Kraft-Weyrather W, Miltenburger HG, Blakely EA, Tobias CA, Kraft G (1985) Heavy ion effects on mammalian cells: inactivation measurement with different cell lines. Radiat Res 104:S122–134Google Scholar
  35. Yang TC, Craise LM, Mei M, Tobias CA (1989) Neoplastic cell transformation by high-LET radiation: molecular mechanisms. Adv Space Res 9:131–140Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Ottolenghi
    • 1
  • M. Merzagora
    • 1
  • L. Tallone
    • 1
  • M. Durante
    • 2
  • H. G. Paretzke
    • 3
  • W. E. Wilson
    • 4
  1. 1.Dipartimento di FisicaUniversità di Milano and INFN, sezione di MilanoMilanItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Scienze FisicheUniversità “Federico II”NaplesItaly
  3. 3.GSF-Institut für StrahlenschutzNeuherbergGermany
  4. 4.Pacific Northwest LaboratoryRichlandUSA

Personalised recommendations