Beiträge zur Mineralogie und Petrographie

, Volume 6, Issue 6, pp 357–365 | Cite as

Development of ptygmatic features within a passive host during partial anatexis

  • Richard V. Dietrich


“Ptygmatic folds” are herein termedptygmatic features orptygmas because folding appears to have had no role in their formation. The term ptygma is defined, by description, on the basis of close examination of numerous occurrences. An hypothesis, termed development in a passive host during differential anatexis, is proposed to account for formation of at least many ptygmas. Under this hypothesis, the characteristic features of a ptygma are formed during development of the ptygma (typically quartz plus one or more feldspars) within a passive host (typically a biotite-feldspar gneiss). The development is dependent upon differ ential melting of the host, local migration of solutions then formed, reactions between the migrating material and the remainder of the rock, and subsequent consolidation. The migration is into zones of real or potential low energy and/or pressure and results in formation of ectects and addition of material to certain relict sedimentary laminae, veinlets, and dikelets. At the time migration starts, the migrating material and the remainder of the rock have unequal chemical energies. So long as these inequalities persist, the interface between the two members of the system will tend to change position and shape and the migrating material will thereby develop the characteristic features of ptygmas.

It appears that conditions necessary to form ptygmas by the suggested means would be such that any spatially associated material of granitic composition would go through a magmatic stage.


Migration Quartz Characteristic Feature Mineral Resource Chemical Energy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barth, T. F. W.: Zonal structure in feldspars of crystalline schists. Tercera Reunion Int. Sobre React. de los sóolidos, Madrid, Sec.3, 263–371 (1956).Google Scholar
  2. Bowex, N. L., andO. F. Tuttle: The system NaAlSi308-KalSi308-H20. J. Geology58, 489–511 (1950).Google Scholar
  3. Burke, J. E.: The migration of grain boundaries: in “Atom Movements”. Amer. Soc. Metals, 204–232 (1951).Google Scholar
  4. De Sitter, L. U.: Structural geology, p. 552. New York: McGraw-Hill 1956.Google Scholar
  5. Gilluly, James: The Ajo mining district, Arizona. U.S. Geol. Survey209, 112 (1946).Google Scholar
  6. Goransox, R. W.: Some notes on the melting of granite. Amer. J. Sci., V. Ser.23, 227–236 (1932).Google Scholar
  7. Odell, N. E.: The petrography of the Franz Joseph Fjord region, northeast Greenland, in relation to its structure: a study in regional metamorphism. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 221–246 (1944).Google Scholar
  8. Scheumaxx, K. H.: Metatexis and metablastesis. Mineral. Petrogr. Mitt.48, 402–412 (1936)Google Scholar
  9. Sederholm, J. J.: Om granit ochgneis. Bull. Comm. Geol. Finlande23, 110 (1907).Google Scholar
  10. Tuttle, O. F.: Origin of the contrasting mineralogy of extrusive and plutonic salic rocks. J. Geology60, 107–124 (1952).Google Scholar
  11. Origin of the contrasting mineralogy of extrusive and plutonic salic rocks: a reply. J. Geology61, 278–280 (1953).Google Scholar
  12. Wegmann, E.: Zur Deutung der Migmatite. Geol. Rdsch.26, 305–350 (1935).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1959

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard V. Dietrich
    • 1
  1. 1.Mineralogisk-Geologck MuseumOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations