Advertisement

Empirical Economics

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 187–202 | Cite as

Growth and the neutrality of money

  • Paul Evans
Public Services, Money, and Growth Linkages

Abstract

Using two simple stochastic growth models that nest both exogenous and endogenous growth, this paper shows that money should not be neutral in the long run if it is not neutral in the short run and if growth is endogenous. By contrast, if growth is exogenous, money should be neutral in the long run. The paper also tests whether money is neutral in the long run, finding no contrary evidence. Given that money is not neutral in the short run, this finding indicates that exogenous growth cannot be rejected in favor of endogenous growth.

Key Words

Growth theory endogenous growth exogenous growth monetary theory neutrality of money 

JEL Classification System-Numbers

O40 C40 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alesina A, Rodrik D (1994) Distributive politics and economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109:465–490Google Scholar
  2. Barro RJ (1977) Long-term contracting, sticky prices, and monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics 3:305–316Google Scholar
  3. Barro RJ (1991) Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106:407–443Google Scholar
  4. Barro RJ, Sala-i-Martin X (1992) Convergence. Journal of Political Economy 100:223–251Google Scholar
  5. Baumol WJ (1986) Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare: What the long-run data show. American Economic Review 76:1072–1085Google Scholar
  6. Cass DM (1965) Optimum growth in an aggregate model of capital accumulation. Review of Economics Studies 32:233–240Google Scholar
  7. De Long, B (1965) Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare. Comment. American Economic Review 78:233–240Google Scholar
  8. De Long B, Summers LH (1991) Equipment investment and economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106:407–444Google Scholar
  9. De Gregorio J (1993) Inflation, taxation, and long-run growth. Journal of Monetary Economics 31:271–298Google Scholar
  10. Easterly W (1993) How much do distortions affect growth? Journal of Monetary Economics 32:187–212Google Scholar
  11. Evans P (1995) How to estimate growth regressions consistently. UnpublishedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischer S (1977) Long-term contracts, rational expectations, and the optimal money supply rule. Journal of Political Economy 85:191–206Google Scholar
  13. Fisher ME, Seater JJ (1993) Long-run neutrality and superneutrality in an ARIMA framework. American Economic Review 83:402–415Google Scholar
  14. Friedman M, Schwartz AJ (1963) A monetary history of the United States, 1867–1960. Princeton New Jersey, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones C (1985) Time series tests of endogenous growth models. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110:495–526Google Scholar
  16. King RG, Levine R (1993) Finance and growth: Schumpeter might be right. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108:717–738Google Scholar
  17. King RG, Plosser CI, Stock JH, Watson MW (1991) Stochastic trends and economic fluctuations. American Economic Review 81:819–840Google Scholar
  18. Kormendi R, Meguire P (1985) Macroeconomic determinants of growth: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Monetary Economics 16:141–163Google Scholar
  19. Lucas RE, Jr (1980) Two illustrations of the quantity theory of money. American Economic Review 70:1005–1014Google Scholar
  20. Lucas RE, Jr (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22:3–42Google Scholar
  21. Mankiw NG, Romer D, Weil DN (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107:407–438Google Scholar
  22. Persson T, Tabellini G (1994) Is inequality harmful? American Economic Review 84:600–621Google Scholar
  23. Phillips PCB, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regressions. Biometrika 65:335–346Google Scholar
  24. Romer PM (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94: 1002–1037Google Scholar
  25. Solow RM (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70:65–94Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Evans
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations