Advertisement

Experimental & Applied Acarology

, Volume 12, Issue 1–2, pp 9–26 | Cite as

Studies on the economics of ticks in Zambia

  • R. G. Pegram
  • A. D. James
  • G. P. M. Oosterwijk
  • K. J. Killorn
  • J. Lemche
  • M. Ghirotti
  • Z. Tekle
  • H. G. B. Chizyuka
  • E. T. Mwase
  • F. Chizhuka
Article

Abstract

Two herds of experimental Sanga cattle were maintained under traditional savanna grazing management for three years in the Central Province of Zambia. One herd was kept free of ticks by regular acaricide treatment, while the other was given no tick control. Milk production, growth rate, fertility and mortality were monitored throughout the trial. The tick-free herd performed significantly better than the tick-infested herd, but the value of the additional production was much less than the cost of the acaricide used. it is concluded that there is no economic justification for intensive tick control under these conditions. However, strategic tick control would be justified if the quantity of acaricide used could be reduced by 50% without any major reduction in benefits. The results indicate that treating calves below 45 days of age reduces their performance, as does treating cows during periods of very low tick challenge. Therefore, it seems likely that economically beneficial strategic tick control policies could be developed.

Keywords

Growth Rate Milk Production Control Policy Additional Production Major Reduction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ellis, P.R., 1986. Interactions between parasite and vector control, animal productivity and rural welfare. In: M.J. Howell (Editor), Parasitology Quo Vadit? Australian Academy of Science, Canberra, pp. 577–585.Google Scholar
  2. James, A.D. and Villamil, L.C., 1986. Cattle Production Efficiency Calculator (CPEC) User Guide. Mimeographed.Google Scholar
  3. Lamond, D.R., Holmes, J.H.G. and Haydock, K.P., 1964. Estimation of yield and composition of milk produced by grazing beef cows. J. Animal Sci., 29: 606–611.Google Scholar
  4. Morris, R.S. and Meek, A.H., 1980. Measurement and evaluation of the economic effects of parasitic disease. Vet. Parasitol., 6: 165–184.Google Scholar
  5. Pegram, R.G. and Chizyuka, H.G.B., 1987. Towards an assessment of the impact of ticks on rural development. In: R.W. Sutherst (Editor), Ticks and Tickborne Disease. A.C.I.A.R. Proc., 17: 104–107.Google Scholar
  6. Pegram, R.G., Perry, B.D., Musisi, F.L. and Mwanaumo, B., 1986. Ecology and phenology of ticks in Zambia: seasonal dynamics on cattle. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 2: 25–45.Google Scholar
  7. Pegram, R.G., Lemche, J., Chizyuka, H.G.B., Sutherst, R.W., Floyd, R.B., Kerr, J.D. and McCosker, P.J., 1989a. Ecological aspect of cattle tick control in central Zambia. Med. Vet. Entomol., 3: 307–312.Google Scholar
  8. Pegram, R.G., Lemche, J., Chizyuka, H.G.B., Sutherst, R.W., Floyd, R.B., Kerr, J.D. and McCosker, P.J., 1989b. Effect of tick control on liveweight gain of cattle in central Zambia. Med. Vet. Entomol., 3: 313–320.Google Scholar
  9. Putt, S.N.H., Shaw, A.P.M., Woods, A.J., Tyler, L. and James, A.D., 1987. Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics in Africa. I.L.C.A., Addis Ababa, Manu. 3.Google Scholar
  10. Steelman, D.C., 1976. Effects of external and internal arthropod parasites on domestic livestock production. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 21: 155–178.Google Scholar
  11. Sutherst, R.W., 1986. Epidemiological concepts and strategies for parasite control: what changes are likely to occur? In: M.J. Howell (Editor), Parasitology Quo Vadit? Australian Academy of Science, Canberra, pp. 721–729.Google Scholar
  12. Sutherst, R.W. and Kerr, J.D., 1987. Loss in livestock productivity caused by ticks and tickborne diseases. In: R.W. Sutherst (Editor), Ticks and Tickborne Diseases. A.C.I.A.R. Proc., 17: 104–107.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Science Publishers B.V 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. G. Pegram
    • 1
  • A. D. James
    • 1
  • G. P. M. Oosterwijk
    • 1
  • K. J. Killorn
    • 1
  • J. Lemche
    • 1
  • M. Ghirotti
    • 1
  • Z. Tekle
    • 1
  • H. G. B. Chizyuka
    • 1
  • E. T. Mwase
    • 1
  • F. Chizhuka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Veterinary and Tsetse Control ServicesFAO/DANIDA ‘Economics of Ticks’ ProjectLusakaZambia

Personalised recommendations