Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 6, Issue 6, pp 737–750 | Cite as

Courtship and intersexual signaling in the parasitic waspCotesia rubecula (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)

  • Scott A. Field
  • Michael A. Keller


The courtship behavior of the parasitic wasp Cotesia rubeculawas studied in a flight tunnel using standard quantitative ethological techniques. Emission of a female sex pheromone induces searching and signaling behavior in males. Males combine wing-fanning, which produces low-frequency airborne sound, with “pulsing” behavior, which transmits a vibrational signal through the substrate to the female and induces her receptivity. Female receptivity is indicated by a stereotyped antennal position, which may provide a visual or tactile signal to courting males. Comparison of successful and unsuccessful courtships indicated that courtship success was dependent primarily on the effective production or reception of the male pulse signal. Overall, the sequence of courtship behavior was similar to that reported for other parasitic wasps.

Key words

sex pheromone vibrational communication courtship sequence Hymenoptera Braconidae Cotesia rubecula 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barrass, R. (1960a). The courtship behaviour ofMormoniella vitripennis.Behaviour 15: 185–209.Google Scholar
  2. Barrass, R. (1960b). The effect of age on the performance of an innate behaviour pattern inMormoniella vitripennis.Behaviour 15: 210–218.Google Scholar
  3. Boush, G. M., and Baerwald, R. J. (1967). Courtship behaviour and evidence for a sex pheromone in the apple maggot parasite,Opius alloeus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 60: 865–866.Google Scholar
  4. Browning, H. R., and Oatman, E. R. (1985). Reproductive biology ofMicroplitis brassicae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), parasite of the cabbage looper,Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 78: 369–372.Google Scholar
  5. Cole, L. R. (1970). Observations on the finding of mates by malePhaeogenes invisor andApanteles medicaginis (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae).Anim. Behav. 18: 184–189.Google Scholar
  6. Field, S. A. (1990).Courtship and Sexual Selection in the Parasitoid Cotesia rubecula, Honours thesis, University of Adelaide, Adelaide.Google Scholar
  7. Field, S. A., and Keller, M. A. (1993). Alternative mating tactics and female mimicry as postcopulatory mate-guarding behaviour in the parasitic waspCotesia rubecula. Anim. Behav. (in press).Google Scholar
  8. Field, S. A., and Keller, M. A. (1994). Localization of the female sex pheromone gland inCotesia rubecula Marshall (Hymenoptera Braconidae).J. Hym. Res. (in press).Google Scholar
  9. Gogala, M. (1985). Vibrational communication in insects (biophysical and behavioural aspects). In Kalmring, K., and Eisner, N. (eds.),Acoustic and Vibrational Communication in Insects, P. Parey, Berlin, pp. 117–126.Google Scholar
  10. Goodman, L. A. (1968). The analysis of cross-classified data: Independence, quasi-independence and interactions in contingency tables with or without missing entries.J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 63: 1091–1131.Google Scholar
  11. Gordh, G., and de Bach, P. (1978). Courtship behaviour in theAphytis lingnamensis group: Its potential usefulness in taxonomy, and a review of sexual behaviour in the parasitic Hymenoptera.Hilgardia 46: 37–75.Google Scholar
  12. Keller, M. A. (1990). Responses of the parasitoidCotesia rubecula to its hostPieris rapae in a flight tunnel.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 57: 243–249.Google Scholar
  13. Matthews, R. W. (1974). Biology of Braconidae.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 19: 15–32.Google Scholar
  14. Matthews, R. W. (1975). Courtship in parasitic wasps. In Price, P. W. (ed.),Evolutionary Strategies in Insects and Mites, Plenum, New York, pp. 67–86.Google Scholar
  15. Matthews, R. W., and Matthews, J. R. (1978).Insect Behavior, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Michelsen, A., Fink, F., Gogala, M., and Traue, D. (1982). Plants as transmission channels for insect vibrational songs.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 11: 269–281.Google Scholar
  17. Miller, M. C., and Tsao, C. H. (1974). Significance of wing vibration in maleNasonia vitripennis (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) during courtship.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 67: 772–774.Google Scholar
  18. Noldus, L. P. J. J. (1991). The Observer: A software system for collection and analysis of observational data.Behav. Res. Method. Instrum. Comp. 23: 415–429.Google Scholar
  19. Obara, M., and Kitano, H. (1974). Studies on the courtship behaviour ofApanteles glomeratus L. 1. Experimental studies on releaser of wing-vibrating behaviour in the male.Kontyu 42: 208–214.Google Scholar
  20. Rice, W. R. (1989). Analyzing tables of statistical tests.Evolution 43: 223–225.Google Scholar
  21. Sales, G., and Pye, D. (1974).Ultrasonic Communication by Animals, Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  22. Sivinski, J., and Webb, J. C. (1989). Acoustic signals produced during courtship inDiachasmimorpha (=Biosteres) longicaudata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and other Braconidae.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 82: 116–120.Google Scholar
  23. Tagawa, J. (1977). Localization and histology of the female sex pheromone-producing gland in the parasitic waspApanteles glomeratus.J. Insect Physiol. 23: 49–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Tagawa, J. (1983). Female sex pheromone glands in the parasitic wasps, genusApanteles.Appl. Entomol. Zool. 18: 416–427.Google Scholar
  25. Tagawa, J., and Hidaka, T. (1982). Mating behaviour of the braconid wasp,Apanteles glomeratus L. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): Mating sequence and the factor for correct orientation of male to female.Appl. Entomol. Zool. 17: 32–39.Google Scholar
  26. van den Assem, J. (1986). Mating behaviour in parasitic wasps. In Waage, J., and Greathead, D. (eds.),Insect Parasitoids, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp. 137–167.Google Scholar
  27. van den Assem, J., and Putters, F. A. (1980). Patterns of sound produced by courting chalcidoid males and its biological significance.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 27: 293–302.Google Scholar
  28. Vinson, S. B. (1972). Courtship behavior and evidence for a sex pheromone in the parasitoidCampoletis sonorensis (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae).Environ. Entomol. 1: 409–414.Google Scholar
  29. Vinson, S. B. (1978). Courtship behaviour and source of a sexual pheromone fromCardiochiles nigriceps.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 71: 832–837.Google Scholar
  30. Weseloh, R. M. (1980). Sex pheromone gland of the gypsy moth parasitoid,Apanteles melanoscelus: Revaluation and ultrastructural survey.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 73: 576–580.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott A. Field
    • 1
  • Michael A. Keller
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Crop ProtectionUniversity of AdelaideGlen Osmond

Personalised recommendations