Advertisement

Experimental & Applied Acarology

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 123–141 | Cite as

Development rates, fecundity and survival of developmental stages of the ticksRhipicephalus appendiculatus, Boophilus decoloratus andB. microplus under field conditions in Zimbabwe

  • N. J. Short
  • R. B. Floyd
  • R. A. I. Norval
  • R. W. Sutherst
Article

Abstract

To determine development rates, fecundity and survival ofRhipicephalus appendiculatus, Boophilus decoloratus andB. microplus, a study was carried out in long and short grass in the highveld of Zimbabwe. Engorged adult females of the three species and engorged larvae and nymphs ofR. appendiculatus were buried beneath the soil in small cages in the rainy, cool and hot seasons in 1980 and 1981. Half the number of cages were examined regularly to determine development rates and half were left undisturbed to determine survival rates and the fecundity of engorged females. Development was most rapid during warm conditions and slowest during cool conditions, but high temperatures appeared to prolong the preoviposition periods of all species. The relationship between fluctuating temperatures and rate of development in the field was defined using a least-squares procedure. Survival of engorged females was usually high, but was reduced by predation when they were not protected. Fecundity was reduced in long grass during the cool season and in short grass during the hot season. A higher percentage of eggs hatched in the rainy season than in the cool or dry seasons. The survival of engorged larvae and nymphs was usually high in all seasons. Engorged nymphs were the hardiest stage and eggs the most suceptible stage to adverse microclimatic conditions.

Keywords

Cage Rainy Season Development Rate Cool Condition Warm Condition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brady, B.L.K., 1979. Descriptions of pathogenic fungi and bacteria. No. 609.Metarhizium anisopliae. Commonwealth Mycological Inst., London.Google Scholar
  2. Branagan, D., 1973a. Observations on the development and survival of the ixodid tickRhipicephalus appendiculatus Neumann, 1901 under quasi-natural conditions in Kenya. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 5: 153–165.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Branagan, D., 1973b. The developmental periods of the ixodid tickRhipicephalus appendiculatus Neum. under laboratory conditions. Bull. Entomol. Res., 63: 155–168.Google Scholar
  4. Dallwitz, M.J. and Higgins, J.P., 1978. Users guide to DEVAR. A computer program for estimating development as a function of temperature CSIRO Div. Entomol. Rep. No. 2., Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  5. Diehl, P.A., Aeschlimann, A. and Obenchain, F.D., 1982. Tick reproduction: oogenesis and oviposition. In: F.D. Obenchain and R. Galun (Editors), Physiology of Ticks, Vol. 1. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 277–350.Google Scholar
  6. Fitzpatrick, E.A. and Nix, H.A., 1969. A model for simulating soil water regime in alternating fallow-crop systems. Agric. For. Meteorol., 6: 303–319.Google Scholar
  7. Floyd, R.B., Maywald, G.F. and Sutherst, R.W., 1987a. Ecological models: II. A population model ofRhipicephalus appendiculatus. In: R.W. Sutherst (Editor), Ecology and Epidemiology of Ticks and Tick Borne Diseases. ACIAR Proc. Ser. No. 17, pp. 72–75.Google Scholar
  8. Floyd, R.B., Sutherst, R.W. and Maywald, G.F., 1987b. Modelling tick management. III. Designing control strategies forRhipicephalus appendiculatus using T3HOST. In: R.W. Sutherst (Editor), Ecology and Epidemiology of Ticks and Tick Borne Diseases. ACIAR Proc. Ser. No. 17, pp. 141–144.Google Scholar
  9. Garris, G.I., 1983.Megaselia scalaus (Diptera: Phoridae) infesting laboratory tick colonies. J. Med. Entomol., 20: 688.Google Scholar
  10. Gothe, R., 1967. Investigations into the cold resistance of the eggs and larvae ofBoophilus decoloratus (Koch, 1844),Boophilus microplus (Canestrini, 1883) andMargaropus winthemi Karsch, 1879. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res., 34: 109–128.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hitchcock, L.F., 1955. Studies on the parasitic stages of the cattle tick,Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) (Acarina: Ixodidae). Aust. J. Zool., 3: 145–155.Google Scholar
  12. Hoogstraal, H., 1956. African Ixodidae. I. Ticks of the Sudan (with special reference to Equatoria Province and with preliminary reviews of the generaBoophilus, Margarapus andHyalomma). U.S. Naval Med. Res. Unit No. 3, Cairo, Res. Rep. NM 005050.29.07.Google Scholar
  13. Howell, C.J., Walker, J.B. and Nevill, E.M., 1978. Ticks, Mites and insects infesting animals in South Africa. Part 1. Descriptions and biology. Govt. Printer, Pretoria, Sci. Bull. No. 393, 69 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Londt, J.G.H., 1974. The preoviposition period ofBoophilus decoloratus (Koch, 1844) (Acarina: Ixodidae). J. Entomol. Soc. South. Afr., 37: 405–412.Google Scholar
  15. Londt, J.G.H., 1977. Oviposition and incubation inBoophilus decoloratus (Koch, 1844) Acarina: Ixodidae). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res., 44: 13–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mason, C.A. and Norval, R.A.I., 1980. The ticks of Zimbabwe. I. The genusBoophilus. Zimbabwe Vet. J., 11: 36–43.Google Scholar
  17. Matthysse, J.G., 1954. Report on tick-borne diseases. Govt. Printer, Lusaka, Zambia (Northern Rhodesia).Google Scholar
  18. Norval, R.A.I., 1977. Tick problems in relation to land utilisation in Rhodesia. Rhod. Vet. J., 8: 33–38.Google Scholar
  19. Norval, R.A.I., Fivas, B.H., Lawrence, J.A. and Brown, A.F., 1985. Epidemiology of tick-borne diseases of cattle in Zimbabwe. III. TheTheileria parva group. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 17: 19–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Punyua, D.K., 1984. Development periods ofRhipicephalus appendiculatus Neumann (Acarina: Ixodidae) under field conditions. Insect. Sci. Applic., 5: 247–250.Google Scholar
  21. Rechav, Y. and von Maltzahn, H.C., 1977. Hatching and weight changes in eggs of two species of ticks in relation to saturation deficit. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 70: 768–770.Google Scholar
  22. Robertson, W.D., 1981. A four year study of the seasonal fluctuations in the occurrence of the blue tickBoophilus decoloratus (Koch) in the coastal regions of the eastern Cape. IN: G.B. Whitehead and J.D. Gibson (Editors), Proc. Int. Conf., Tick Biological Control, 27–29 January 1981, Grahamstown, S. Africa. Tick Res. Unit, Rhodes Univ., Grahamstown, pp. 199–204.Google Scholar
  23. Short, N.J. and Norval, R.A.I., 1981. The seasonal activity ofRhipicephalus appendiculatus Neumann 1901 (Acarina: Ixodidae) in the Highveld of Zimbabwe Rhodesia. J. Parasitol., 67: 77–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Short, N.J. and Norval, R.A.I., 1982. Tick predation by shrews in Zimbabwe. J. Parasitol., 68: 1052.Google Scholar
  25. Short, N.J., Floyd, R.B., Norval, R.A.I. and Sutherst, R.W., 1989. Survival and behaviour of unfed stages of the ticksRhipicelphalus appendiculatus, Boophilus decoloratus andB. microplus under field conditions in Zimbabwe. Exp. Appl. Acarol, 6: 215–236.Google Scholar
  26. Spikett, A.M. and Malan, J.R., 1978. Genetic incompatibility betweenBoophilus decoloratus (Koch, 1844) andBoophilus microplus (Canestrini, 1883) and hybrid sterility of Australian and South AfricanBoophilus microplus (Acarina: Ixodidae). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res., 45: 149–153.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sutherst, R.W., 1981. Is the Australian pest management approach to tick control relevant to Africa? In: G.B. Whitehead and J.D. Gibson (Editors), Proc. Int. Conf., Tick Biological Control, 27–29 Janury 1981, Grahamstown, S. Africa. Tick Res. Unit, Rhodes Univ., Grahamstown, pp. 79–85.Google Scholar
  28. Sutherst, R.W., 1987a. The role of models in tick control. In: K.L. Hughes (Editor), Proc. Int. Conf. Veterinary Preventative Medicine and Animal Production, Melbourne, 25–29 November 1985. Aust. Vet. Assoc., Sydney, pp. 32–37.Google Scholar
  29. Sutherst, R.W., 1987b. The dynamics of hybrid zones between tick species. Int. J. Parasitol., 17: 921–926.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Tatchell, R.J., 1981. Current methods of tick control with special reference to theileriosis. In: A.D. Irvin, M.P. Cunningham and A.S. Young (Editors), Advances in the Control of Theileriosis. Current Topics in Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Vol. 14. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp. 148–159.Google Scholar
  31. Theiler, G., 1962. The Ixodoidae parasites of vertebrates in Africa south of the Sahara (Ethiopian region). Project S. 9958, Report to the Director, Veterinary Services, Onderstepoort.Google Scholar
  32. Tukahirwa, E.M., 1976. The effects of temperature and relative humidity on the development ofRhipicephalus appendiculatus Neumann (Acarina: Ixodidae). Bull. Entomol. Res., 66: 301–312.Google Scholar
  33. Walker, J.B., 1974. The ixodid ticks of Kenya. A review of present knowledge of their hosts and distribution. Commonwealth Entomological Inst., London, 220 pp.Google Scholar
  34. Wilson, S.G., 1946. Seasonal occurrence of Ixodidae on cattle in Northern Province, Nyasaland. Parasitology, 37: 113–125.Google Scholar
  35. Yeoman, G.N. and Walker, J.B., 1967. The ixodid ticks of Tanzania. A study of the zoogeography of the Ixodidae of an East African country. Commonwealth Entomological Inst., London, 215 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. J. Short
    • 1
  • R. B. Floyd
    • 2
  • R. A. I. Norval
    • 1
  • R. W. Sutherst
    • 2
  1. 1.Veterinary Research LaboratoryCauseway(Zimbabwe)
  2. 2.Division of Entomology, Long Pocket LaboratoriesCSIROIndooroopilly(Australia)

Personalised recommendations