Advertisement

Engineering with Computers

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 27–35 | Cite as

Form finding of shells by structural optimization

  • K. -U. Bletzinger
  • E. Ramm
Article

Abstract

Shell structures are known to be extremely parameter sensitive; even small changes of the initial design, e.g., to the shape of the shell, may drastically change the internal stress state. The ideal case for concrete shells is a pure membrane stress state in compression for all loading conditions. Since in many realistic situations the solution for an ‘optimal’ shape is not obvious, the need for form finding methods is evident. This paper presents computational methods of structural optimization as a general tool for the form finding of shells. The procedure as a synthesis of design modelling, structural analysis and mathematical optimization is discussed with special emphasis on the modelling stage. Several examples show the power of the approach and the similarities to experimental solutions.

Keywords

Computer aided geometrical design Form finding Shells Structural optimization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ramm, E.; Mehlhorn, G. (1991) On shape finding methods and ultimate load analyses of reinforced concrete shells, Engineering Structures, 13, 178–198Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Isler, H. (1990) Elegante Modelle-die moderne Form des Schalenbaus, Deutsche Bauzeitung, db 7, 62–65Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ramm, E.; Schunck, E. (1986) Heinz Isler-Schalen, Krämer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haftka, R.T.; Grandhi, R.V. (1986) Structural shape optimization—a survey, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng. 57, 91–106Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kruzelecki, J.; Zyczkowski, M. (1985) Optimal structural design of shells—a survey, SM Archives, 10, 101–170Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schmit, L.A. (1981) Structural synthesis—its genesis and development, AIAA Journal, 19, 1249–1263Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Petiau, C. (1991) Structural optimization of aircraft, Thin Walled Structures, 11, 43–64Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kimmich, S. (1990) Strukturoptimierung und Sensibilitäts-analyse mit finiten Elementen, PhD Dissertation, Institut für Baustatik, Universität StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bletzinger, K.-U. (1990) Formoptimierung von Flächentragwerken, PhD Dissertation, Institut für Baustatik, Universität StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Braibant, V.; Fleury, C. (1986) Shape optimal design and CAD oriented formulation, Engineering with Computers, 1, 193–204Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schittkowski, K. (1981) The nonlinear programming method of Wilson, Han and Powell with an augmented Lagrangian type line search function, Numerische Mathematik, 38, 83–114Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Svanberg, K. (1987) The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization, Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng, 24, 359–373Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ramm, E.; Bletzinger, K.-U.; Kimmich, S. (1991) Strategies in shape optimization of free form shells, Nonlinear Computational Mechanics-State of the Art (Wriggers, P. and Wagner, W., Editors), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 163–192.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bletzinger, K.-U.; Kimmich, S.; Ramm, E. (1991) Efficient modeling in shape optimal design, Computing Systems in Engineering, 2, 483–495Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kimmich, S.; Ramm, E. (1989) Structural optimization and analysis with program system CARAT, Proc. GAMM-Seminar, October 5–7, 1988, Siegen, on Discretization Methods and Structural Optimization-Procedures and Applications (Eschenauer, H.A. and Thierauf, G., Editors), Lecture Notes in Engineering, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 186–193Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Böhm, W.; Farin, G.; Kahmann, J. (1984) A survey of curve and surface methods in CAGD, Comp. Aided Geom. Des., 1, 1–60Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Faux, I.D.; Pratt, M.J. (1979) Computational Geometry for Design and Manufacture, Ellis Horwood, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Philippi, U.; Nachtigall, W. (1991) Constructional morphology of sea urchin tests, to be presented at the 2nd International Symposium on Natural Structures-Principles, Strategies, and Models in Architecture and Nature, SFB 230, Stuttgart, October 1–4Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. -U. Bletzinger
    • 1
  • E. Ramm
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für BaustatikUniversity of StuttgartStuttgart 80Germany

Personalised recommendations