Hernia

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 161–166 | Cite as

A bilayer patch device for inguinal hernia repair

  • A. I. Gilbert
  • M. F. Graham
  • W. J. Voigt
How to do it

Summary

A new bilayer device was used in 759 patients to repair inguinal hernias at the Hernia Institute of Florida. All but three procedures were done under local or regional anesthesia, and all patients were ambulatory. Results are encouraging, though the time these patients have been followed is short. There has not been a failure noted or reported. Minor postoperative complications, consistent with rates of other open hernia repair procedures, have occurred. The unique feature of this polypropylene mesh device is that it has three attached components. Its underlay patch provides a posterior mesh repair. Its connector has the desirable attributes of a plug repair. Its onlay patch covers the posterior wall, well lateral to the internal inguinal ring. A few sutures in the onlay patch assure the stability of the entire three-part, one-piece device. A description of the myopectineal orifice and commentary of its significance is presented. One purpose of publishing this early report is to share with other surgeons some personal observations that can help to simplify technique of dissection of the posterior space, and the deployment of the underlay patch.

Key words

Inguinal hernia Myopectineal orifice Plasticity Insertion maneuver Bilayer device 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arregui ME (1995) A laparoscopic perspective of the anatomy of the peritoneum, preperitoneal fascias, transversalis and structures in the space of Bogros. Postgraduate General Surgery 6: 30–36Google Scholar
  2. Condon RE (1978) Hernia. Second edition,Google Scholar
  3. Nyhus Ebert P (1990) Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons: May issue, editorialGoogle Scholar
  4. Gilbert AI (1989) An anatomic and functional classification for the diagnosis and treatment of inguinal hernia. Am J Surg 157: 331–333PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gilbert AI (1997) Symposium on the management of inguinal hernias. Sutureless technique: second version. Canadian Journal Surgery 40: 209–212Google Scholar
  6. Lichtenstein IL (1989) The tension-free hernio-plasty. Am J Surg 157: 188–193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Read RC (1994) Transversalis fascia-a reanalysis. In: Inguinal Hernia: advances or controversies? Arregui ME, Nagen RF, Radcliffe Medical Press, Oxford and New York: 35–39Google Scholar
  8. Rives J (1968) Les pièces en Dacron et leur place dans la chirurgie des hernies de l'aine. A propos de 65 cas recueillis dans une statistique intégrale de 274 interventions pour hernie. Ann Chir 22: 159–171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Robbins AW, Rutkow IM (1993) The mesh-plug hernioplasty. Surg Clin North Am 73: 501–512PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Shulman AG, Amid PK, Lichtenstein IL (1992) The safety of mesh repair for primary inguinal hernias. Am Surg 58: 255–257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Wantz GE, (1992) Giant prosthetic reinforcement of the visceral sac for repair of a re-recurrent inguinal hernia. Postgraduate General Surgery 4: 109–113Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. I. Gilbert
    • 1
  • M. F. Graham
    • 1
  • W. J. Voigt
    • 1
  1. 1.Hernia Institute of FloridaMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations