Advertisement

Experimental & Applied Acarology

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 231–236 | Cite as

Cold storage ofPhytoseiulus persimilis (Phytoseiidae)

  • W. D. Morewood
Short Communication

Abstract

Phytoseiulus persimilis is commerelally mass-reared for use as a biological control agent for spider mites, primarilyTetranychus urticae, and cold storage is a potentially valuable aspect of mass-production. Cold storage ofP. persimilis in empty containers was found to be unsatisfactory, but provision of moisture during cold storage greatly increased survival. Provision of food further increased survival even though the mites were stored at temperatures below their threshold for development of 11°C. When food was provided, survival at 7.5°C was 97% after 4 weeks and 80% after 6 weeks. Subsequent longevity and fecundity of mites that survived 8 weeks at 7.5°C was comparable to mites taken directly from mass-rearing cultures. Survival of mites packaged in bran or vermiculite and held at 6°C for 10 days ranged from 75% to 85% and was not decreased by agitating the containers to simulate shipping. However, survival of mites held in bran or vermiculite at 5°C or 8°C for 4 weeks was poor, ranging from 0–19%, due to growth of mould in the media.Phytoseiulus persimilis can be successfully stored for 4 to 6 weeks in containers provisioned only with food and moisture; granular media used for distribution of the mites should be added just prior to shipping.

Keywords

Biological Control Bran Control Agent Cold Storage Biological Control Agent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bernstein, C., 1983. Some aspects ofPhytoseiulus persimilis [Acarina: Phytoseiidae] dispersal behaviour. Entomophaga, 28:185–198.Google Scholar
  2. Hamamura, T., Shinkaji, N. and Ashihara, W., 1976. The relationship between temperature and developmental period, and oviposition ofPhytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Bull. Fruit Tree Res. Stn. (Minist. Agric. Forest.) Series E (Akitsu), 1:117–125.Google Scholar
  3. Hamamura, T., Shinkaji, N. and Ashihara, W., 1978. Studies on the low temperature storage ofPhytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Bull. Fruit Tree Res. Stn. (Minist. Agric. Forest.) Series E (Akitsu), 2:83–90 (in Japanese, with English summary).Google Scholar
  4. King, E.G. and Morrison, R.K., 1984. Some systems for production of eight entomophagous arthropods. In: E.G. King and N.C. Leppla (Editors), Advances and Challenges in Insect Rearing. Agricultural Research Service (Southern Region), U.S. Department of Agriculture, New Orleans, pp. 206–222.Google Scholar
  5. Mori, H. and Chant, D.A., 1966. The influence of humidity on the activity ofPhytoselulus persimilis Athias-Henriot and its prey,Tetranychus urticae (C.L. Koch) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae). Can. J. Zool., 44:863–871.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Perring, T.M. and Lackey, L.J., 1989. Temperature and humidity effects on mortality and preadult development of twoPhytoseiulus persimilis strains (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Int. J. Acarol., 15:47–52.Google Scholar
  7. Sabelis, M.W., 1981. Biological control of two-spotted spider mites using phytoseiid predators. Part I: modelling the predator-prey interaction at the individual level. Agricultural Research Reports 910, Pudoc, Wageningen, Netherlands, 242 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Van Lenteren, J.C. and Woets, J., 1988. Biological and integrated pest control in greenhouses. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 33:239–269.Google Scholar
  9. Zar, J.H., 1984. Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 718 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. D. Morewood
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations