Advertisement

Mathematical Methods of Operations Research

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 437–454 | Cite as

A unified treatment of single component replacement models

  • Hans Frenk
  • Rommert Dekker
  • Marcel Kleijn
Article

Abstract

In this paper we discuss a general framework for single component replacement models. This framework is based on the regenerative structure of these models and by using results from renewal theory a unified presentation of the discounted and average finite and infinite horizon cost models is given. Finally, some well-known replacement models are discussed, and making use of the previous results an easy derivation of their cost functions is presented.

Key words

Maintenance Renewal Theory Cost Intensity Function 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Ash RB (1972) Real analysis and probability. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Asmussen S (1987) Applied probability and queues. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Barlow RE, Proschan F (1967) Mathematical theory of reliability. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Berg M (1980) A marginal cost analysis for preventive maintenance policies. European Journal of Operational Research 4:136–142Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Berg M (1995) The marginal cost analysis and its application to repair and replacement policies. European Journal of Operational Research 82:214–224Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Berg M (1996) Economics oriented maintenance analysis and marginal cost approach. In: Özekici S (ed) Reliability and maintenance of complex systems. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Berg M, Epstein B (1979) A note on a modified block replacement policy for units with increasing marginal running costs. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 26:157–179Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Block HW, Borges WS, Savits TH (1988) A general age replacement model with minimal repair. Naval Research Logistics 35:365–372Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Cleroux R, Hanscom M (1974) Age replacement with adjustment and deprecation costs and interest charges. Technometrics 16:235–239Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Dekker R, Smeitink E (1991) Opportunity based block replacement. European Journal of Operational Research 53:46–62Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Feller W (1971) An Introduction to probability theory and its applications, volume 2. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Fox B (1966) Age replacement with discounting. Operations Research 14:535–537Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Frenk JBG, Dekker R, Kleijn MJ (1996) A unified treatment of single component replacement models. Technical Report 9602/A, Econometric Institute, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands, report available on internet http://www.eur.nl/few/ei/papersGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Loeve M (1977) Probability theory I. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Makis V, Jardine AKS (1991) Optimal replacement of a system with imperfect repair. Microelectron. Reliability 31:381–388Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Makis V, Jardine AKS (1992) Optimal replacement policy for a general model with imperfect repair. Journal of the Operational Research Society 43:111–120Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    McCall JJ (1965) Maintenance policies for stochastically failing equipment: A survey. Management Science 11:493–524Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Mikolas M (1994) Real functions, Abstract spaces and orthogonal series. Akademia Kiadó, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Muth EJ (1977) An optimal decision rule for repair vs. replacement. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 26:179–181Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Nakagawa T, Kowada M (1988) Analysis of a system with minimal repair and its application to replacement policy. European Journal of Operational Research 12:176–182Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Pierskalla WP, Voelker JA (1979) A survey of maintenance models: the control and surveillance of deteriorating systems. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 23:353–388Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Ran A, Rosenlund SI (1976) Age replacement with discounting for a continuous maintenance cost model. Technometrics 18:459–465Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Ross SM (1970) Applied probability models with optimization applications. Holden-Day, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Schaeffer RL (1971) Optimum age replacement with an increasing cost factor. Technometrics 13:139–144Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Sherif YS, Smith ML (1981) Optimal maintenance models for systems subject to failure — a review. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 28:47–74Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Sivazlian BD (1973) On the discounted replacement problem with arbitrary repair time distribution. Management Science 19:1301–1309Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Valdez-Flores C, Feldman RM (1989) A survey of preventive maintenance for stochastically deteriorating single component systems. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 36:419–446Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Van Weeren S (1995) Single-component maintenance and fractional programming. Master Thesis, Econometric Institute, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Wolff RW (1989) Stochastic modelling and the theory of queues. Prentice Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Zijlstra M (1979) Regenerative replacement policies with general cost structures. ISA-Research-SP note 92 (second revised edition), N. V. Philips, EindhovenGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Zijlstra M (1981) Renewal replacement policies for one unit systems. European Journal of Operational Research 8:289–293Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Frenk
    • 1
  • Rommert Dekker
    • 1
  • Marcel Kleijn
    • 1
  1. 1.Econometric InstituteErasmus University RotterdamDR RotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations