Mathematical Methods of Operations Research

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 147–170 | Cite as

An improved asymptotic analysis of the expected number of pivot steps required by the simplex algorithm

  • Karl -Heinz Küfer
Article

Abstract

Leta1 ...,a m be i.i.d. points uniformly on the unit sphere in ℝ n ,mn ≥ 3, and letX:= {xε ℝ n |a i T x≤1} be the random polyhedron generated bya1, ...,a m . Furthermore, for linearly independent vectorsu, ū in ℝ n , letS u ,ū (X) be the number of shadow vertices ofX inspan(u,ū). The paper provides an asymptotic expansion of the expectation value¯S n,m := in4 1 E(S u,ū ) for fixedn andm→ ∞.¯S n,m equals the expected number of pivot steps that the shadow vertex algorithm — a parametric variant of the simplex algorithm — requires in order to solve linear programming problems of type max u T ,xεX, if the algorithm will be started with anX-vertex solving the problem max ū T ,x ε X. Our analysis is closely related to Borgwardt's probabilistic analysis of the simplex algorithm. We obtain a refined asymptotic analysis of the expected number of pivot steps required by the shadow vertex algorithm for uniformly on the sphere distributed data.

Key words

Linear programming simplex algorithm probabilistic analysis asymptotic expansion convex hull stochastic geometry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Adler I, Karp R, Shamir R (1993) A simplex variant solving anm × d linear program in\(\mathcal{O}\)(min(m 2,d 2)) expected number of pivot steps. University of California, Computer Science Division, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Adler I, Meggido N (1983) A simplex algorithm whose average number of steps is bounded between two quadratic functions of the smaller dimension. Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Borgwardt KH (1977) Untersuchungen zur Asymptotik der mittleren Schrittzahl von Simplexverfahren in der linearen Optimierung. Dissertation, Universität KaiserslauternGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Borgwardt KH (1978) Untersuchungen zur Asymptotik der mittleren Schrittzahl von Simplexverfahren in der linearen Optimierung. Operations Research Verfahren 28:332–345Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Borgwardt KH (1982) The average number of pivot steps required by the simplex method is polynomial. ZOR 26:157–177Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Borgwardt KH (1987) The simplex method — A probabilistic analysis. Springer, New York, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Borgwardt KH (1994) Verschärfung des Polynomialitätsbeweises für die erwartete Anzahl von Schattenecken im Rotationssymmetrie-Modell. In: Schock E (ed.) Beiträge zur Angewandten Analysis und Informatik. Shaker, AachenGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Schneider R, Weil W (1992) Integralgeometrie. Teubner, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Shamir R (1987) The efficiency of the simplex method: A survey. Management science 33:241–262Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Smale S (1983) On the average speed of the simplex method. Math Prog 27:241–262Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Wendel J (1962) A problem in geometric probability. Math scand 11:109–111Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl -Heinz Küfer
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of MathematicsUniversity of KaiserslauternKaiserslauternGermany

Personalised recommendations