Experimental & Applied Acarology

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 29–46 | Cite as

Resurgences of spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) induced by synthetic pyrethroids

  • Uri Gerson
  • Ephraim Cohen
Article

Abstract

Causes of spider mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) population resurgences consequent upon exposure to synthetic pyrethroid (SP) treatments are reviewed. Resurgences may be seen as soon as 1 week, or even as late as a whole season, post-treatment. Synthetic pyrethroids vary in their adverse effects on spider mites, and also differ in their ability to invoke resurgences of different spidermite species on diverse plants. These pesticides are lethal as well as repellent to phytoseiids and other predators that prey on spider mites, may inhibit fungi which attack the latter, and affect phytophagous competitors. Spider mites are likewise repelled by SPs, thus becoming more evenlydistributed and less web-restricted, with a resultant increase in fecundity. Spider-mite development is shortened due to SPs and the sex ratio becomes more female-biased; onset of winter diapause also seems to be delayed. Synthetic pyrethroids appear to sensitize to spider-mite infestation plants which have not hitherto been attacked. Some SP effects (whether on spider mites, natural enemies or competitors) appear to be direct, whereas others may be mediated through the host plants. The effect of SPs on the other Acari is variable within the Prostigmata and Astigmata. Most Mesostigmata and Metastigmata (ticks) are very sensitive, whilst the Cryptostigmata (Oribatei) appear to be insensitive. Synthetic pyrethroids-induced resurgences of Homoptera are comparatively reviewed, with the conclusion that some of the phenomena may be similar to those observed in spider mites. Various resurgence models are discussed, as well as the three main causes of variation (SPs, spider-mite species, host plants) in the observed phenomena. The need for more rigorous and carefully controlled experimentation is emphasized.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aerts, J., 1978. Repellent-werking van decamethrine tegen kasspint bij tomaten. Med. Fac. Landbouww. Rijksuniv. Gent, 43: 655–660.Google Scholar
  2. AliNiazee, M.T. and Cranham, J.E., 1980. effect of four synthetic pyrethroids on a predatory mite,Typhlodromus pyri, and its prey,Panonychus ulmi, on apples in southest England. Environ. Entomol., 9: 436–439.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, T.E. and Roberts, D.W., 1983. compatibility ofBeauveria bassiana isolates with insecticide formulations used in Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera; Chrysomelidae) control. J. Econ. Entomol., 76: 1437–1441.Google Scholar
  4. Antignus, Y., Klein, M., Birati, I., Ovadia, S. and Karni, J., 1985. Chemical control of the planthopperLaodelphax striatellus, vector of the maize rough dwarf virus, to reduce disease damage in corn fields. Hassadeh, 65: 894–898 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  5. Arias Giralda, A. and Nieto Calderon, J., 1982. Eficacia de dos insecticidos fosforados organicos y dos piretroides contra ‘pollila del racimo’ (Lobesia botrana Den. & Schiff.) y efecto secundario sobre ‘araña amarilla comun’ (Tetranychus urticae Koch). Bol. Serv. Def. Plaga Inspect. Fito., 7: 185–197.Google Scholar
  6. Baird, C.R. and Frohlich, D.R., 1986. Foliar miticides on alfalfa, Idaho, 1984. Insect. Acar. Tests, 11: 204.Google Scholar
  7. Ben-Arieh, Z., 1985. The use of “Maverick” has caused populations of the European red spider mite to increase. Hassadeh, 65: 2232–2233 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  8. Breese, M.H. and Highwood, D.P., 1977. Cypermethrin. a new synthetic pyrethroid insecticide. In: Proc. 1977 British Crop Protection Conf., November, Brighton. British Crop Protection Council, pp. 641–648.Google Scholar
  9. Buschman, L.L., 1983. Effects of pyrethroids and miticides on spider mite, Southwestern corn borer and prdator populations, 1982. Insect. Acar. Tests, 8: 169–170.Google Scholar
  10. Chisaka, K., Minamite, Y., Ohgami, H. and Katsuda, Y., 1985. Efficacy of various types of pyrethroid compounds againstTyrophagus putrescentiae andDermatophagoides farinae. Jpn. J. Sanit. Zool., 36: 7–13 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  11. Cranham, J.E. and Helle, W., 1985. Pesticide resistance in Tetranychidae. In: W. Helle and M. Sabelis (Editors), Spider Mites, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Vol. 1B, pp. 405–421.Google Scholar
  12. Croft, B.A. and Hoyt, S.C., 1978. Considerations for the use of pyrethroid insecticides for deciduous fruit pest control in the U.S.A. Environ. Entomol., 7: 627–630.Google Scholar
  13. Derrick, M.E. and Durant, J.A., 1986. Rate response of cotton to three pyrethroids. J. Econ. Entomol., 79: 1627–1631.Google Scholar
  14. Dittrich, V., Streibert, P. and Bathe, P.A., 1974. An old case reopened: mite stimulation by insecticide residues. Environ. Entomol., 3: 534–540.Google Scholar
  15. Easterbrook, M.A., 1984. Effects of pesticides on the apple rust miteAculus schlechtendali (Nal.) (Eriophyidae). J. Hort. Sci., 49: 51–55.Google Scholar
  16. Elliott, M., Jones, N.F. and Potter, C., 1978. The future of pyrethroids in insect control. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 23: 443–469.Google Scholar
  17. Fujita, Y., Kasamatsu, K., Fujiwara, A. and Matsumoto, K., 1981. Control of citrus red mite (Panonychus citri) with fenpropathrin. Proc. Int. Soc. Citricult., 2: 661–663.Google Scholar
  18. Gerson, U., 1979. Concluding remarks to section on plant mites. In: E. Piffl (Editor), Proc. 4th Int. Congress of Acarology, Saalfelden, August 1974. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp. 235–236.Google Scholar
  19. Gerson, U. and Aronowitz, A., 1981. Spider mite webbing. Part IV: The effect of acaricides on spinning by the carmine spider miteTetranychus cinnabarinus (Boisduval). Pestic. Sci., 12: 211–214.Google Scholar
  20. Guaguere, E., Dorchies, P., Franc, M. and de Lahitte, J.D., 1981. Traitment de la démodécie du chien par un pyréthrinoide de synthèse: cyperméthrin. Résultats preliminaires. Rev. Méd. Vét., 131: 857–859.Google Scholar
  21. Hall, F.R., 1979. Effects of synthetic pyrethroids on major insect and mite pests of apple. J. Econ. Entomol., 72: 441–446.Google Scholar
  22. Hargley, E.A.C. and Simpson, C.M., 1983. Effect of insecticides on predators of the pear psylla,Psylla pyricola (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in Ontario. Can. Entomol., 115: 1409–1414.Google Scholar
  23. Harris, C.R. and Kinoshita, G.B., 1977. Influence of posttreatment temperature on the toxicity of pyrethroid insecticides. J. Econ. Entomol., 70: 215–218.Google Scholar
  24. Heinrichs, E.A. and Mochida, O., 1984. From secondary to major pest status: the case of insecticide-induced rice brown planthopper,Nilaparvata lugens, resurgence. Prot. Ecol., 7: 201–218.Google Scholar
  25. Hoy, M.A., Flaherty, D., Peacock, W. and Culver, D., 1979. Vineyard and laboratory evaluations of methomyl, dimethoate, and permethrin for a grape pest management program in the San Joaquin Valley of California. J. Econ. Entomol., 72: 250–255.Google Scholar
  26. Hoyt, S.C., Westigard, P.H. and Burts, E.C., 1978. Effects of two synthetic pyrethroids on the codling moth, pear psylla and various mite species in northwest apple and pear orchards. J. Econ. Entomol., 71: 431–434.Google Scholar
  27. Hull, L.A. and Starner, V.R., 1983. Impact of four synthetic pyrethroids on major natural enemies and pests of apple in Pennsylvania. J. Econ. Entomol., 76: 122–130.Google Scholar
  28. Hull, L.A., Beers, E.H. and Meagher, R.L., Jr., 1985. Impact of selective use of the synthetic pyrethroid fenvalerate on apple pests and natural enemies in large-orchard trials. J. Econ. Entomol., 78: 163–168.Google Scholar
  29. Hurkova, J., 1984. Response of OP-resistantTetranychus urticae to pyrethroids. Vêst. Česk. Spol. Zool., 48: 102–106.Google Scholar
  30. Iftner, D.C. and Hall, F.R., 1983a. Toxicities of selected synthetic pyrethroids to two species of phytophagous mites. J. Econ. Entomol., 76: 687–689.Google Scholar
  31. Iftner, D.C. and Hall, F.R., 1983b. Effects of fenvalerate and permethrin onTetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) dispersal behavior. Environ. Entomol., 12: 1782–1786.Google Scholar
  32. Iftner, D.C. and Hall, F.R., 1984. The effects of fenvalerate and permethrin residues onTetranychus urticae Koch fecundity and rate of development. J. Agric. Entomol., 1: 191–200.Google Scholar
  33. Iftner, D.C., Hall, F.R. and Sturm, M.M., 1986. Effects of residues of fenvalerate and permethrin on the feeding behaviour ofTetranychus urticae (Koch). Pestic. Sci., 17: 242–248.Google Scholar
  34. Jones, V.P. and Parrella, M.P., 1984. The sublethal effects of selected insecticides on life table parameters ofPanonychus citri (Acari: Tetranychidae). Can. Entomol., 116: 1033–1040.Google Scholar
  35. Kapetanakis, E.G., Warman, T.M. and Cranham, J.E., 1986. Effects of permethrin sprays on the mite fauna of apple orchards. Ann. Appl. Biol., 108: 21–32.Google Scholar
  36. Kasamatsu, K. and Kawachi, K., 1985. Impact of six synthetic pyrethroids on Kanzawa spider mites of cotton, Japan 1984. Insect. Acar. Tests, 10: 229.Google Scholar
  37. Kilsby, K.D. and Steven, D., 1983. Trials with pirimiphos-methyl/permethrin on kiwifruit. In: Proc. 36th N.Z. Weed and Pest Control Conf., pp. 107–110.Google Scholar
  38. Mair, K., Redl, H., Weindlmayr, J. and Mantinger, H., 1984. Untersuchungen über den Einfluss von Pyrethroiden auf den Spinnmilben befall im Apfelanbau. Mitt. Klosterneuburg, 34: 226–233.Google Scholar
  39. Margolies, D.C. and Kennedy, G.G., 1984. Population response of the twospotted spider mite,Tetranychus urticae, to host phenology in corn and peanut. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 36: 193–196.Google Scholar
  40. McKee, M.J. and Knowles, C.O., 1984. Effects of pyrethroids on respiration in the twospotted spider mite (Acari: Tetranychidae). J. Econ. Entomol., 77: 1376–1380.Google Scholar
  41. McKee, M.J. and Knowles, C.O., 1985. Pharmacokinetics of pyrethroids in twospotted spider mites. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 24: 326–335.Google Scholar
  42. Meleney, W.P. and Roberts, I.H., 1979. Trials with eight acaricides againstPsoroptes ovis the sheep scabies mite. In: J.G. Rodriguez, (Editor), Recent Advances in Acarology, Vol. II. Academic, New York, pp. 95–101.Google Scholar
  43. Mollet, J.A. and Sevacherian, V., 1984. Pesticide and seasonal effects on within-plant distribution ofTetranychus cinnabarinus (Boisduval) (Acarina: Tetranychidae) in cotton. J. Econ. Entomol., 77: 925–928.Google Scholar
  44. Nolan, J., Roulston, W.J. and Wharton, R.H., 1977. Resistance to synthetic pyrethroids in a DDT-resistant strain ofBoophilus microplus. Pestic. Sci., 8: 484–486.Google Scholar
  45. Nowakowski, Z., 1982. Effects of the two synthetic pyrethroids on European mite (Panonychus ulmi Koch). Fruit Sci. Rep., 9: 29–38.Google Scholar
  46. Penman, D.R. and Chapman, R.B., 1980. Woolly apple aphid outbreak following use of fenvalerate in apples in Canterbury, New Zealand. J. Econ. Entomol., 73: 49–51.Google Scholar
  47. Penman, D.R. and Chapman, R.B., 1983a. Fenvalerate-induced distributional imbalances of two-spotted spider mite on bean plants. Entomol. Exp. Appl., 33: 71–78.Google Scholar
  48. Penman, D.R. and Chapman, R.B., 1983b. Mite outbreaks revisited: from DDT to pyrethroids. In: Proc. XV Pacific Science Congr., Dunedin, 1983.Google Scholar
  49. Penman, D.R., Chapman, R.B. and Jesson, K.E., 1981. Effects of fenvalerate and azinphosmethyl on two-spotted spider mite and phytoseiid mites. Entomol. Exp. Appl., 30: 91–97.Google Scholar
  50. Penman, D.R., Chapman, R.B. and Bowie, M.H., 1984. An index of activity of pyrethroid insecticides on twospotted spider mites. In: M.J. Hartley, A.J. Popay and A.I. Popay (Editors), Proc. 37th N.Z. Weed and Pest Control Conf., 14–16 August 1984, Canterbury. N.Z. Weed and Pest Control Soc., pp. 262–264.Google Scholar
  51. Plaut, H.N. and Mansour, F., 1980. Effects of stable pyrethroid insecticides on population densities of spider mites in Israel-history, early observations, a field experiment, and outlook. Alon Ha'Notea, 34: 779–784 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  52. Plaut, H.N. and Mansour, F.A., 1981. Effects of photostable pyrethroids on spider mites (Tetranychidae). Phytoparasitica, 9: 218.Google Scholar
  53. Price, J.F., 1981. Response of twospotted spider mites, leafminers and their parasitoids and other arthropods to newly developed pesticides in chrysanthemums. Proc. Fla. State Hortic. Soc., 94: 80–83.Google Scholar
  54. Renou, A. and Aspirot, J., 1984. Considérations sur l'utilisation de pyréthrinoïdes en culture cotonnièr au Tchad. Coton Fibres Trop., 39: 101–116.Google Scholar
  55. Riedl, H. and Hoying, S.A., 1980. Impact of fenvalerate and diflubenzuron on target and nontarget arthropod species on Bartlett pears in northern California. J. Econ. Entomol., 73: 117–122.Google Scholar
  56. Riedl, H. and Hoying, S.A., 1983. Toxicity and residual activity of fenvalerate toTyphlodromus occidentalis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and its preyTetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) on pear. Can. Entomol., 115: 807–813.Google Scholar
  57. Roberts, R.H. and Zimmerman, J.H., 1980. Chigger mites: efficacy of control with two pyrethroids. J. Econ. Entomol., 73: 811–812.Google Scholar
  58. Rock, G.C., 1979. Relative toxicity of two synthetic pyrethroids to a predatorAmblyseius fallacis and its preyTetranychus urticae. J. Econ. Entomol., 72: 293–294.Google Scholar
  59. Ruscoe, C.N.E., 1977. The new NRDC pyrethroids as agricultural insecticides. Pestic. Sci., 8: 236–242.Google Scholar
  60. Sances, F.V., Toscano, N.C., Johnson, M.W. and LaPre, L.F., 1981. Pesticides may reduce lettuce yield. Calif. Agric. 35 (11–12): 4–5.Google Scholar
  61. Schuster, M.F., Calvin, P.D. and Langston, W.C., 1983. Interaction of high tannin with bollworm damage control by Pydrin and Dipel. In: J.M. Brown (Editor), Proc. 1983 Beltwide Cotton Production Research Conf., January 1983, San Antonio, Tex. Nat. Cotton Council of America, pp. 72–73.Google Scholar
  62. Smith, T.M. and Stratton, G.W., 1986. Effects of synthetic pyrethroid insecticides on nontarget organisms. Residue Rev., 97: 93–120.Google Scholar
  63. Stratton, G.W. and Corke, C.T., 1982. Comparative fungitoxicity of the insecticide permethrin and ten degradation products. Pestic. Sci., 13: 679–685.Google Scholar
  64. Strider, D.L., 1976. Activity of pyrethroid insecticides against powdery mildew fungi. Plant Dis. Rep., 60: 512–514.Google Scholar
  65. Sun, C.-N. and Dai, S.-M., 1984. Brown planthopper (BPH) resistance to a synthetic pyrethroid. Int. Rice. Res. Newsl., 9: 12.Google Scholar
  66. Vaissayre, 1986. Chemical control of the mitePolyphagotarsonemus latus (Banks) in cotton fields. Coton Fibres Trop., 41: 31–44.Google Scholar
  67. Van de Vrie, M., McMurtry, J.A. and Huffaker, C.B., 1972. Ecology of tetranychid mites and their natural enemies: a review. III. Biology, ecology and pest status, and host-plant relations of tetranychids. Hilgardia, 41: 343–432.Google Scholar
  68. Watson, W.M., El-Beheiry, M.M. and Guirguis, M.W., 1985. Laboratory and field studies on the effect of sequential application of pesticides on susceptibility and on some biological aspects of the miteTetranychus cinnabarinus (Boids.). Acarologia, 26: 17–23.Google Scholar
  69. Weires, R.W., 1984. Economic impact of a flucythrinate-induced resurgence of the Comstock mealybug (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) on apple. J. Econ. Entomol., 77: 186–189.Google Scholar
  70. Weires, R.W. and Smith, G.L., 1978. Apple mite control, Hudson valley, 1977. Insect. Acar. Tests, 3: 42–43.Google Scholar
  71. Williams, R.E. and Berry, J.G., 1980. Control of northern fowl mite with permethrin and fenvalerate, two synthetic pyrethroid compounds. Poult. Sci., 59: 1211–1214.Google Scholar
  72. Wong, S.W. and Chapman, R.B., 1979. Toxicity of synthetic pyrethroid insecticides to predaceous phytoseiid mites and their prey. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 30: 497–501.Google Scholar
  73. Wood, B. and Payne, J., 1984. Influence of single applications of insecticides on net photosynthesis of pecan. HortScience, 19: 265–266.Google Scholar
  74. Worthing, C.R. and Walker, S.B., 1983. The Pesticide Manual, A World Compendium. British Crop Protection Council, 7th Edition, 695 pp.Google Scholar
  75. Zeman, P. and Železný, J., 1985. The susceptibility of the poultry red mite,Dermanyssus gallinae (De Geer, 1778), to some acaricides under laboratory conditions. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 1: 17–22.Google Scholar
  76. Zwick, R.W. and Fields, G.J., 1978. Field and laboratory evaluations of fenvalerate against several insect and mite pests of apple and pear in Oregon. J. Econ. Entomol., 71: 793–796.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Uri Gerson
    • 1
  • Ephraim Cohen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyHebrew University of Jerusalem, Faculty of AgricultureRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations