Characterization of sourdough bread ferments made in the laboratory by traditional methods

  • Mohamed Faid
  • Fatima Boraam
  • Ilham Zyani
  • Jean Paul Larpent
Original Paper

Abstract

Sourdough ferments were reconstitued in the laboratory according to three traditional procedures used in rural areas for building sourdough ferments. The ferments were subcultured on wheat flour to make four generations, which were then used to study the micro-organisms involved in the fermentation of sourdough bread and the characteristic flora that may remain in the ferment for a long time. The analyses carried out on the ferments of the four generations included determinations of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and yeasts and physico-chemical characteristics (pH, titratable acidity and dough-rising capacity). The results showed thatLactobacillus plantarum, L. delbrückii, Leuconostoc mesenteroides andPediococcus pentosaceus were the most frequent species in all of the trials. Some other species includingLactobacillus buchneri, L. casei andL. sanfrancisco were also isolated in high proportions and in many samples. In some trials the microflora was dominated by LAB and the yeast counts decreased significantly in the fourth generation despite the leavening action of the ferments.

Charakterisierung von Sauerteigen, die im Labor nach traditionellen Verfahren hergestellt wurden

Zusammenfassung

Sauerteig-Kulturen wurden im Labor nach traditionellen, ländlichen Verfahren gewonnen. Sie wurden über vier Generationen auf Weizenmehl kultiviert, dann erfolgte eine Floraanalyse. Bestimmt wurden die Milchsäurebakterien und Hefen sowie deren Charakteristika.Lactobacillus plantarum, L. delbrückii, Leuconostoc mesenteroidis undPediococcus pentosaceus waren die am regelmäßigsten vorkommenden Species.L. buchneri, L. casei undL. sanfrancisco wurden ebenfalls oft isoliert. Mit zunehmender Generationenzahl dominierten die Lactobacillen über die Hefen.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Boraam F, Faid M, Larpent JP, Breton A (1992) Sci Alim 13:501–509Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barber S, Baguena R (1988) Rev Agroquim Technol Aliment 28:67–78Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lonner C, Preve-Akesson K (1989) Food Microbiol 6:19–35Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Spicher G, Lonner G (1985) Z Lebensm Unters Forsch 181:9–13Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sharpe ME (1979) Identification of the lactic acid bacteria. Identification methods for microbiologists, 2nd ed. Skinner FA, Lovelock DW (eds) Soc Appl Bac Technol Ser 14: 233–259Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Garvie El (1986) GeneraLeuconostoc. In: Sneath PHA, Mair NS, Sharpe ME, Holts JG (eds) Bergy's mannual of determinative bacteriology, vol 2. Williams and Wilkins BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tanataoui-Elaarki A, Berrada M, Elamarrakchi A, Berramou A (1983) Le Lait 63:23–245Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kline L, Sugihara TF (1971) Appl Microbiol 21:459–465PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spicher G, Stephan H (1982) Handbuch Sauerteig: Biologie, Biochemie, Technologie. BBV Wirtschaftsminformationen GmbH HamburgGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lonner C, Preve-Akesson K (1988) Food Microbiol 5:43–58Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Spicher G (1959) Zentbl Bakt Parasitkde Abt II 113:80–106Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sugihara TF (1985) Microbiology of bread making in microbiology of fermented foods, vol 1. Wood BJB (ed) Elsevier, London New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohamed Faid
    • 1
  • Fatima Boraam
    • 1
  • Ilham Zyani
    • 1
  • Jean Paul Larpent
    • 2
  1. 1.Département de Microbiologie Alimentaire et BiotechnologieInstitut Agronomique et Vétérinaire Hassan IIRabat-InstMorocco
  2. 2.Laboratoire de MicrobiologieUniversité Blaise PascalClermont-FerrandFrance

Personalised recommendations